linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianxianting <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: avoid a unnecessary reschedule in shrink_slab()
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:33:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca5e3e13f00348898bb9205a7eeb4c85@h3c.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201016134457.GM22589@dhcp22.suse.cz>

Thanks for the explain.
I got it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michal Hocko [mailto:mhocko@suse.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 9:45 PM
To: tianxianting (RD) <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: avoid a unnecessary reschedule in shrink_slab()

On Fri 16-10-20 13:20:41, Tianxianting wrote:
> Thanks
> I understood what you said :)
> But whether it is proper to check reschedule in every loop when lock is taken? 

I do not see any actual problem TBH. cond_resched is mostly to increase interactivity for non preemptible kernel. It can reduce throughput but this is a memory reclaim path and I do not expect this to contribute to any moderate hot paths. Direct reclaim doesn't really count as a hot path.

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-16 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-16  3:39 Xianting Tian
2020-10-16 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-16 12:48   ` Tianxianting
2020-10-16 13:02     ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-16 13:20       ` Tianxianting
2020-10-16 13:44         ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-16 14:33           ` Tianxianting [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca5e3e13f00348898bb9205a7eeb4c85@h3c.com \
    --to=tian.xianting@h3c.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox