linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	david@redhat.com, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	nramas@linux.microsoft.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	robh@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, rppt@kernel.org,
	sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] x86/crash: Add x86 crash hotplug support
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:26:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca43bd5f-8a74-9412-3d4b-52c7d5e54978@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1wL+ZrvD5gTZaKN@zn.tnic>



On 10/28/22 12:06, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:29:45AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote:
>> So it is with this in mind that I suggest we stay with the statically sized elfcorehdr buffer.
>>
>> If that can be agreed upon, then it is "just a matter" of picking a useful
>> elfcorehdr size. Currently that size is derived from the NR_DEFAULT_CPUS and
>> CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES. So, there is still the CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES knob
>> to help a dial in size, should there be some issue with the default
>> value/size.
> 
> Let's see
> 
>          kbuf.memsz =
>                  (CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES) *
>                          sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
> 
> which, IINM, is
> 
> 	(8192 + 32768) * 56
> 
> which is something like 2M.
> 
> (CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT = 8192 - this is because of MAXSMP which gets
> set on distro kernels)
> 
> Now, since userspace kexec tools uses 2048 for max memory ranges, that
> size becomes smaller - around half a Mb. And since y'all wanna be on the
> safe side, you can quadruple it and have
> 
> 	(8192 + 8192) * 56
> 
> which is still under a megabyte. And that's fine, I guess, on a big
> server.

Excellent, I'll set CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES to 8192! That seems a quite fair trade off of elfcorehdr 
size vs system size (ie 1TiB w/ 128MiB memblock size).

> 
>> Or if there is desire to drop computing the size from NR_DEFAULT_CPUs and
> 
> I think you should leave the dependency on the Kconfig size so that
> smaller machines which are configured this way, don't end up wasting
> unnecessary memory.

Excellent, I'll leave the computation as NR_DEFAULT_CPUS + CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES.

> 
>> It is my intention to correct the CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES (if we keep it) as such:
>>
>> config CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
>>      depends on CRASH_DUMP && KEXEC_FILE && MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> 
> Yes, but don't leave it to the user to decide what number to choose
> - choose a high enough number, explain why you've chosen this with a
> comment and that's it.

I currently have the Kconfig item as:

config CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
     depends on CRASH_DUMP && KEXEC_FILE && MEMORY_HOTPLUG
     int
     default 8192
     help
       For the kexec_file_load path, specify the maximum number of
       memory regions, eg. as represented by the 'System RAM' entries
       in /proc/iomem, that the elfcorehdr buffer/segment can accommodate.
       This value is combined with NR_CPUS and multiplied by Elf64_Phdr
       size to determine the final buffer size.

I'll work to provide information a better explanation as to the 8192 number.

Thank you!
eric

> 
> Thx.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-28 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220909210509.6286-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com>
     [not found] ` <20220909210509.6286-8-eric.devolder@oracle.com>
     [not found]   ` <Yx7XEcXZ8PwwQW95@nazgul.tnic>
     [not found]     ` <cb343eef-46be-2d67-b93a-84c75be86325@oracle.com>
     [not found]       ` <YzRxPAoN+XmOfJzV@zn.tnic>
     [not found]         ` <fd08c13d-a917-4cd6-85ec-267e0fe74c41@oracle.com>
2022-09-30 16:50           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-30 17:11             ` Eric DeVolder
2022-09-30 17:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-08  2:35                 ` Baoquan He
2022-10-12 17:46                   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-12 20:19                     ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-12 20:41                       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-13  2:57                         ` Baoquan He
2022-10-25 10:31                           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-26 14:48                             ` Baoquan He
2022-10-26 14:54                               ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-27 13:52                                 ` Baoquan He
2022-10-27 19:28                                   ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-29  4:27                                     ` Baoquan He
2022-10-27 19:24                               ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-28 10:19                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-28 15:29                                   ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-28 17:06                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-28 19:26                                       ` Eric DeVolder [this message]
2022-10-28 20:30                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-28 20:34                                           ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-28 21:22                                           ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-28 22:19                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-12 20:42                       ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-12 16:20                 ` Eric DeVolder
2022-10-25 10:39                   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca43bd5f-8a74-9412-3d4b-52c7d5e54978@oracle.com \
    --to=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox