linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid poison consumption when splitting THP
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:12:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c88a263e-a73e-430a-bfb9-a2b9a32dede8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911021401.734817-1-balrogg+code@gmail.com>

On 11.09.25 04:14, Andrew Zaborowski wrote:
> Handling a memory failure pointing inside a huge page requires splitting
> the page.  The splitting logic uses a mechanism, implemented in
> migrate.c:try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(), that inspects contents of
> individual pages to find zero-filled pages.  The read access to the
> contents may cause a new, synchronous exception like an x86 Machine
> Check, delivered before the initial memory_failure() finishes, ending
> in a crash.
> 
> Luckily memory_failure() already sets the has_hwpoisoned flag on the
> folio right before try_to_split_thp_page().  Don't enable the shared
> zeropage mechanism (RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE flag) down in
> __split_unmapped_folio() when the original folio has has_hwpoisoned.
> 
> Note: we're disabling a potentially useful feature, some of the
> individual pages that aren't poisoned might be zero-filled.  One
> argument for not trying to add a mechanism to maybe re-scan them later,
> apart from code cost, is that the owning process is likely being
> killed and the memory released.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Zaborowski <balrogg+code@gmail.com>
> ---

I would suggest just checking whether the page (PageHWPoison()) is 
poisoned before doing the check for zero. If set, just treat it as non-zero.

No need to stop the split.

You'll have to do that in two locations.

No need to mess with RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11  2:14 Andrew Zaborowski
2025-09-11  3:19 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-11  6:19   ` Lance Yang
2025-09-11  8:12 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c88a263e-a73e-430a-bfb9-a2b9a32dede8@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balrogg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox