linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: yangshiguang <yangshiguang1011@163.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	harry.yoo@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@gentwo.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, glittao@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yangshiguang <yangshiguang@xiaomi.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: slub: avoid wake up kswapd in set_track_prepare
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 10:46:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c85034fe-d48e-4433-8c65-52bfb1d5d69b@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11922bd5.7fae.1990464d9c8.Coremail.yangshiguang1011@163.com>

On 9/1/25 10:29, yangshiguang wrote:
> 
> 
> At 2025-09-01 16:15:04, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>>On 9/1/25 09:50, David Rientjes wrote:
>>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2025, yangshiguang1011@163.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From: yangshiguang <yangshiguang@xiaomi.com>
>>>> 
>>>> From: yangshiguang <yangshiguang@xiaomi.com>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Duplicate lines.
>>> 
>>>> set_track_prepare() can incur lock recursion.
>>>> The issue is that it is called from hrtimer_start_range_ns
>>>> holding the per_cpu(hrtimer_bases)[n].lock, but when enabled
>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS, may wake up kswapd in set_track_prepare,
>>>> and try to hold the per_cpu(hrtimer_bases)[n].lock.
>>>> 
>>>> Avoid deadlock caused by implicitly waking up kswapd by
>>>> passing in allocation flags. And the slab caller context has
>>>> preemption disabled, so __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM must not appear in gfp_flags.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> This mentions __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM, but the patch actually masks off 
>>> __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM which would be a heavierweight operation.  Disabling 
>>> direct reclaim does not necessarily imply that kswapd will be disabled as 
>>> well.
>>
>>Yeah I think the changelog should say __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.
>>
>>> Are you meaning to clear __GFP_RECLAIM in set_track_prepare()?
>>
>>No because if the context context (e.g. the hrtimers) can't support
>>__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM it won't have it in gfp_flags and we now pass them to
> 
>>set_track_prepare() so it already won't be there.
> 
> 
> Sry. Should be __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. I will resend the patch.

I have adjusted it locally already. Also moved the masking of
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM to ___slab_alloc itself as that's where
the preemption is disabled so it's more obvious.

Does the result look good to you?

commit 1b7052bc536650f8ca29b4f6f8682dc9f5692d16
Author: yangshiguang <yangshiguang@xiaomi.com>
Date:   Sat Aug 30 10:09:46 2025 +0800

    mm: slub: avoid wake up kswapd in set_track_prepare
    
    set_track_prepare() can incur lock recursion.
    The issue is that it is called from hrtimer_start_range_ns
    holding the per_cpu(hrtimer_bases)[n].lock, but when enabled
    CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS, may wake up kswapd in set_track_prepare,
    and try to hold the per_cpu(hrtimer_bases)[n].lock.
    
    Avoid deadlock caused by implicitly waking up kswapd by passing in
    allocation flags, which do not contain __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM in the
    debug_objects_fill_pool() case.
    Since ___slab_alloc() has preemption disabled and thus was using
    GFP_NOWAIT, we instead mask out __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM from the flags.
    
    The oops looks something like:
    
    BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#3, swapper/3/0
     lock: 0xffffff8a4bf29c80, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/3/0, .owner_cpu: 3
    Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Popsicle based on SM8850 (DT)
    Call trace:
    spin_bug+0x0
    _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x80
    hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x94
    task_contending+0x10c
    enqueue_dl_entity+0x2a4
    dl_server_start+0x74
    enqueue_task_fair+0x568
    enqueue_task+0xac
    do_activate_task+0x14c
    ttwu_do_activate+0xcc
    try_to_wake_up+0x6c8
    default_wake_function+0x20
    autoremove_wake_function+0x1c
    __wake_up+0xac
    wakeup_kswapd+0x19c
    wake_all_kswapds+0x78
    __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x1ac
    __alloc_pages_noprof+0x298
    stack_depot_save_flags+0x6b0
    stack_depot_save+0x14
    set_track_prepare+0x5c
    ___slab_alloc+0xccc
    __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x470
    __set_page_owner+0x2bc
    post_alloc_hook[jt]+0x1b8
    prep_new_page+0x28
    get_page_from_freelist+0x1edc
    __alloc_pages_noprof+0x13c
    alloc_slab_page+0x244
    allocate_slab+0x7c
    ___slab_alloc+0x8e8
    kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x450
    debug_objects_fill_pool+0x22c
    debug_object_activate+0x40
    enqueue_hrtimer[jt]+0xdc
    hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x5f8
    ...
    
    Signed-off-by: yangshiguang <yangshiguang@xiaomi.com>
    Fixes: 5cf909c553e9 ("mm/slub: use stackdepot to save stack trace in objects")
    Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
    Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 1787e4d51e48..d257141896c9 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -962,19 +962,19 @@ static struct track *get_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKDEPOT
-static noinline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(void)
+static noinline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(gfp_t gfp_flags)
 {
 	depot_stack_handle_t handle;
 	unsigned long entries[TRACK_ADDRS_COUNT];
 	unsigned int nr_entries;
 
 	nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 3);
-	handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_NOWAIT);
+	handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, gfp_flags);
 
 	return handle;
 }
 #else
-static inline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(void)
+static inline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(gfp_t gfp_flags)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -996,9 +996,9 @@ static void set_track_update(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
 }
 
 static __always_inline void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
-				      enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr)
+				      enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags)
 {
-	depot_stack_handle_t handle = set_track_prepare();
+	depot_stack_handle_t handle = set_track_prepare(gfp_flags);
 
 	set_track_update(s, object, alloc, addr, handle);
 }
@@ -1926,9 +1926,9 @@ static inline bool free_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
 static inline void slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab) {}
 static inline int check_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 			void *object, u8 val) { return 1; }
-static inline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(void) { return 0; }
+static inline depot_stack_handle_t set_track_prepare(gfp_t gfp_flags) { return 0; }
 static inline void set_track(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
-			     enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr) {}
+			     enum track_item alloc, unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags) {}
 static inline void add_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
 					struct slab *slab) {}
 static inline void remove_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
@@ -3881,9 +3881,14 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
 			 * For debug caches here we had to go through
 			 * alloc_single_from_partial() so just store the
 			 * tracking info and return the object.
+			 *
+			 * Due to disabled preemption we need to disallow
+			 * blocking. The flags are further adjusted by
+			 * gfp_nested_mask() in stack_depot itself.
 			 */
 			if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
-				set_track(s, freelist, TRACK_ALLOC, addr);
+				set_track(s, freelist, TRACK_ALLOC, addr,
+					  gfpflags & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM));
 
 			return freelist;
 		}
@@ -3915,7 +3920,8 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
 			goto new_objects;
 
 		if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
-			set_track(s, freelist, TRACK_ALLOC, addr);
+			set_track(s, freelist, TRACK_ALLOC, addr,
+				  gfpflags & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM));
 
 		return freelist;
 	}
@@ -4426,8 +4432,12 @@ static noinline void free_to_partial_list(
 	unsigned long flags;
 	depot_stack_handle_t handle = 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * We cannot use GFP_NOWAIT as there are callsites where waking up
+	 * kswapd could deadlock
+	 */
 	if (s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
-		handle = set_track_prepare();
+		handle = set_track_prepare(__GFP_NOWARN);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
 



  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-01  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-30  2:09 yangshiguang1011
2025-09-01  7:50 ` David Rientjes
2025-09-01  8:15   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-01  8:29     ` yangshiguang
2025-09-01  8:46       ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-09-01  9:00         ` yangshiguang
2025-09-01  9:14           ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c85034fe-d48e-4433-8c65-52bfb1d5d69b@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=glittao@gmail.com \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangshiguang1011@163.com \
    --cc=yangshiguang@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox