From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
clang-built-linux <llvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: ./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set but not used
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:51:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c82af143-b620-44d9-8647-f52096b851ab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72mQh3O9S4umbvrKBgMMorty48UMwS01U22FR0mRyd3cyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 16.04.24 12:26, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi David, Arnd, LoongArch,
>
> In a linux-next defconfig LLVM=1 build today I got:
>
> ./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set
> but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
> 629 | pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr, unsigned long address)
> | ^
>
> Indeed, in loongarch, `__tlb_remove_tlb_entry` does not do anything.
> This seems the same that Arnd reported for arm64:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221154549.2026073-1-arnd@kernel.org/
>
> So perhaps the loongarch's one should also be changed into an static inline?
4d5bf0b6183f79ea361dd506365d2a471270735c is already part of v6.9-rc1. How come
we see that only now on linux-next?
I assume we should see the same on upstream Linux with LLVM=1, correct?
If so, we should likely just drop that completely and rely on the asm-generic one:
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h
index da7a3b5b9374a..e071f5e9e8580 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -132,8 +132,6 @@ static __always_inline void invtlb_all(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr)
);
}
-#define __tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, ptep, address) do { } while (0)
-
static void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
#define tlb_flush tlb_flush
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-16 10:26 Miguel Ojeda
2024-04-16 13:51 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-04-16 14:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-16 14:41 ` Huacai Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c82af143-b620-44d9-8647-f52096b851ab@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox