Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: teach kill_accessing_process to accept hugetlb tail page pfn

[jane.chu@oracle.com]

On 12/19/2025 10:18 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 10:55:16AM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
>>   static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
>> -				unsigned long poisoned_pfn, struct to_kill *tk)
>> +				unsigned long poisoned_pfn, struct to_kill *tk,
>> +				int pte_nr)
> 
> if we pass in huge_page_mask() instead ...
> 
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long pfn = 0;
>> +	unsigned long hwpoison_vaddr;
>>   
>>   	if (pte_present(pte)) {
>>   		pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
>> @@ -694,10 +696,11 @@ static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
>>   			pfn = swp_offset_pfn(swp);
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (!pfn || pfn != poisoned_pfn)
>> +	if (!pfn || (pfn > poisoned_pfn || (pfn + pte_nr - 1) < poisoned_pfn))
> 
> ... then we can simplify this to:
> 
> 	if (!pfn || ((pfn | mask) != (poisoned_pfn | mask))
> 
>>   		return 0;
>> @@ -2037,6 +2038,7 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb
>>   		return action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, MF_IGNORED);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +
>>   	folio = page_folio(p);
>>   	folio_lock(folio);
> 
> unnecessary whitespace change

Thanks! I'll incorporate the mask idea in v3.

-jane