From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, urezki@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, ajd@linux.ibm.com, rppt@kernel.org,
david@kernel.org, Xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm/vmalloc: map contiguous pages in batches for vmap() if possible
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 19:33:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c54e12b0-1a35-48e1-b243-991de246a8ca@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408025115.27368-6-baohua@kernel.org>
On 08/04/26 8:21 am, Barry Song (Xiaomi) wrote:
> In many cases, the pages passed to vmap() may include high-order
> pages allocated with __GFP_COMP flags. For example, the systemheap
> often allocates pages in descending order: order 8, then 4, then 0.
> Currently, vmap() iterates over every page individually—even pages
> inside a high-order block are handled one by one.
>
> This patch detects high-order pages and maps them as a single
> contiguous block whenever possible.
>
> An alternative would be to implement a new API, vmap_sg(), but that
> change seems to be large in scope.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index eba436386929..e8dbfada42bc 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -3529,6 +3529,53 @@ void vunmap(const void *addr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vunmap);
>
> +static inline int get_vmap_batch_order(struct page **pages,
> + unsigned int max_steps, unsigned int idx)
> +{
> + unsigned int nr_pages;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP) ||
> + ioremap_max_page_shift == PAGE_SHIFT)
> + return 0;
> +
> + nr_pages = compound_nr(pages[idx]);
> + if (nr_pages == 1 || max_steps < nr_pages)
> + return 0;
This assumes that the page array passed to vmap() will have compound pages
if it is a higher order allocation.
See rb_alloc_aux_page(). It gets higher-order allocations without passing
GFP_COMP.
That is why my implementation does not assume anything about the property
of the pages.
Also it may be useful to do regression-testing for the common case of
vmap() with a single page (assuming it is common, I don't know), in
which case we may have to special case it.
My implementation requires opting in with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP - I suspect
you may run into problems if you make vmap() do huge-mappings as best-effort
by default. I am guessing this because ...
Drivers can operate on individual pages, so vmalloc() calls split_page()
and then does the block/cont mappings. This same issue should be present
with vmap() too? In which case if we are to do huge-mappings by default
then we can do split_page() after detecting contiguous chunks.
But ... that may create problems for the caller of vmap() - vmap now
has the changed the properties of the pages.
> +
> + if (num_pages_contiguous(&pages[idx], nr_pages) == nr_pages)
> + return compound_order(pages[idx]);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vmap_contig_pages_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> + pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages)
> +{
> + unsigned int count = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = kmsan_vmap_pages_range_noflush(addr, end, prot, pages,
> + PAGE_SHIFT, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; ) {
> + unsigned int shift = PAGE_SHIFT +
> + get_vmap_batch_order(pages, count - i, i);
> +
> + err = vmap_range_noflush(addr, addr + (1UL << shift),
> + page_to_phys(pages[i]), prot, shift);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + addr += 1UL << shift;
> + i += 1U << (shift - PAGE_SHIFT);
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + flush_cache_vmap(addr, end);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vmap - map an array of pages into virtually contiguous space
> * @pages: array of page pointers
> @@ -3572,8 +3619,8 @@ void *vmap(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
> return NULL;
>
> addr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
> - if (vmap_pages_range(addr, addr + size, pgprot_nx(prot),
> - pages, PAGE_SHIFT) < 0) {
> + if (vmap_contig_pages_range(addr, addr + size, pgprot_nx(prot),
> + pages) < 0) {
> vunmap(area->addr);
> return NULL;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 2:51 [RFC PATCH 0/8] mm/vmalloc: Speed up ioremap, vmalloc and vmap with contiguous memory Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] arm64/hugetlb: Extend batching of multiple CONT_PTE in a single PTE setup Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 10:32 ` Dev Jain
2026-04-08 11:00 ` Barry Song
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] arm64/vmalloc: Allow arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size to batch multiple CONT_PTE Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm/vmalloc: Extend vmap_small_pages_range_noflush() to support larger page_shift sizes Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 11:08 ` Dev Jain
2026-04-08 21:29 ` Barry Song
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm/vmalloc: Eliminate page table zigzag for huge vmalloc mappings Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm/vmalloc: map contiguous pages in batches for vmap() if possible Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 4:19 ` Dev Jain
2026-04-08 5:12 ` Barry Song
2026-04-08 11:22 ` Dev Jain
2026-04-08 14:03 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-04-08 21:54 ` Barry Song
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm/vmalloc: align vm_area so vmap() can batch mappings Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm/vmalloc: Coalesce same page_shift mappings in vmap to avoid pgtable zigzag Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 11:36 ` Dev Jain
2026-04-08 21:58 ` Barry Song
2026-04-08 2:51 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm/vmalloc: Stop scanning for compound pages after encountering small pages in vmap Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-04-08 9:14 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] mm/vmalloc: Speed up ioremap, vmalloc and vmap with contiguous memory Dev Jain
2026-04-08 10:51 ` Barry Song
2026-04-08 10:55 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c54e12b0-1a35-48e1-b243-991de246a8ca@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox