linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 13:11:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e640be-3d82-c955-fc28-568ec13d378a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180519011947.GJ5479@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>

On 05/19/2018 03:19 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> The issue you may be talking about here is that  --
> 
> "when you set the AMR register to 0xffffffffffffffff, it
> just sets it to 0x0c00000000000000."
> 
> To me it looks like, exec/fork are not related to the issue.
> Or are they also somehow connected to the issue?
> 
> 
> The reason the AMR register does not get set to 0xffffffffffffffff,
> is because none of those keys; except key 2, are active. So it ignores
> all other bits and just sets the bits corresponding to key 2.

Here's a slightly different test:

#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <err.h>

/* Return the value of the AMR register.  */
static inline unsigned long int
pkey_read (void)
{
   unsigned long int result;
   __asm__ volatile ("mfspr %0, 13" : "=r" (result));
   return result;
}

/* Overwrite the AMR register with VALUE.  */
static inline void
pkey_write (unsigned long int value)
{
   __asm__ volatile ("mtspr 13, %0" : : "r" (value));
}

int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
   printf ("AMR (PID %d): 0x%016lx\n", (int) getpid (), pkey_read());
   if (argc > 1 && strcmp (argv[1], "alloc") == 0)
     {
       int key = syscall (__NR_pkey_alloc, 0, 0);
       if (key < 0)
         err (1, "pkey_alloc");
       printf ("Allocated key in subprocess (PID %d): %d\n",
               (int) getpid (), key);
       return 0;
     }

   pid_t pid = fork ();
   if (pid == 0)
     {
       printf ("AMR after fork (PID %d): 0x%016lx\n",
               (int) getpid (), pkey_read());
       execl ("/proc/self/exe", argv[0], "alloc", NULL);
       _exit (1);
     }
   if (pid < 0)
     err (1, "fork");
   int status;
   if (waitpid (pid, &status, 0) < 0)
     err (1, "waitpid");

   int key = syscall (__NR_pkey_alloc, 0, 0);
   if (key < 0)
     err (1, "pkey_alloc");
   printf ("Allocated key (PID %d): %d\n", (int) getpid (), key);

   unsigned long int amr = -1;
   printf ("Setting AMR: 0x%016lx\n", amr);
   pkey_write (amr);
   printf ("New AMR value (PID %d): 0x%016lx\n",
           (int) getpid (), pkey_read());
   if (argc == 1)
     {
       printf ("About to call execl (PID %d) ...\n", (int) getpid ());
       execl ("/proc/self/exe", argv[0], "execl", NULL);
       err (1, "exec");
       return 1;
     }
   else
     return 0;
}

It produces:

AMR (PID 110163): 0x0000000000000000
AMR after fork (PID 110164): 0x0000000000000000
AMR (PID 110164): 0x0000000000000000
Allocated key in subprocess (PID 110164): 2
Allocated key (PID 110163): 2
Setting AMR: 0xffffffffffffffff
New AMR value (PID 110163): 0x0c00000000000000
About to call execl (PID 110163) ...
AMR (PID 110163): 0x0c00000000000000
AMR after fork (PID 110165): 0x0000000000000000
AMR (PID 110165): 0x0000000000000000
Allocated key in subprocess (PID 110165): 2
Allocated key (PID 110163): 2
Setting AMR: 0xffffffffffffffff
New AMR value (PID 110163): 0x0c00000000000000

A few things which are odd stand out (apart the wrong default for AMR 
and the AMR update restriction covered in the other thread):

* execve does not reset AMR (see after a??About to call execla??)
* fork resets AMR (see lines with PID 110165))
* After execve, a key with non-default access rights is allocated
   (see a??Allocated key (PID 110163): 2a??, second time, after execl)

No matter what you think about the AMR default, I posit that each of 
those are bugs (although the last one should be fixed by resetting AMR 
on execve).

Thanks,
Florian

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-19 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18 14:27 Florian Weimer
2018-05-19  1:19 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19  1:50   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-19  5:26     ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 20:27     ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19 23:47       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20  6:04         ` Ram Pai
2018-05-20  6:06           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20 19:11             ` Ram Pai
2018-05-21 11:29               ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-03 20:18                 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 10:12                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 14:01                     ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 17:57                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 19:02                         ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 21:00                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08  2:34                             ` Ram Pai
2018-06-08  5:53                               ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 10:15                                 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 10:44                                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 12:54                                     ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 12:57                                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 13:49                                         ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 13:51                                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 14:17                                             ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-11 17:23                                 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-11 17:29                                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11 20:08                                     ` Ram Pai
2018-06-12 12:17                                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19  5:12   ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 11:11   ` Florian Weimer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4e640be-3d82-c955-fc28-568ec13d378a@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox