From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: pkeys on POWER: Access rights not reset on execve
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 13:11:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e640be-3d82-c955-fc28-568ec13d378a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180519011947.GJ5479@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
On 05/19/2018 03:19 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> The issue you may be talking about here is that --
>
> "when you set the AMR register to 0xffffffffffffffff, it
> just sets it to 0x0c00000000000000."
>
> To me it looks like, exec/fork are not related to the issue.
> Or are they also somehow connected to the issue?
>
>
> The reason the AMR register does not get set to 0xffffffffffffffff,
> is because none of those keys; except key 2, are active. So it ignores
> all other bits and just sets the bits corresponding to key 2.
Here's a slightly different test:
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <err.h>
/* Return the value of the AMR register. */
static inline unsigned long int
pkey_read (void)
{
unsigned long int result;
__asm__ volatile ("mfspr %0, 13" : "=r" (result));
return result;
}
/* Overwrite the AMR register with VALUE. */
static inline void
pkey_write (unsigned long int value)
{
__asm__ volatile ("mtspr 13, %0" : : "r" (value));
}
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
printf ("AMR (PID %d): 0x%016lx\n", (int) getpid (), pkey_read());
if (argc > 1 && strcmp (argv[1], "alloc") == 0)
{
int key = syscall (__NR_pkey_alloc, 0, 0);
if (key < 0)
err (1, "pkey_alloc");
printf ("Allocated key in subprocess (PID %d): %d\n",
(int) getpid (), key);
return 0;
}
pid_t pid = fork ();
if (pid == 0)
{
printf ("AMR after fork (PID %d): 0x%016lx\n",
(int) getpid (), pkey_read());
execl ("/proc/self/exe", argv[0], "alloc", NULL);
_exit (1);
}
if (pid < 0)
err (1, "fork");
int status;
if (waitpid (pid, &status, 0) < 0)
err (1, "waitpid");
int key = syscall (__NR_pkey_alloc, 0, 0);
if (key < 0)
err (1, "pkey_alloc");
printf ("Allocated key (PID %d): %d\n", (int) getpid (), key);
unsigned long int amr = -1;
printf ("Setting AMR: 0x%016lx\n", amr);
pkey_write (amr);
printf ("New AMR value (PID %d): 0x%016lx\n",
(int) getpid (), pkey_read());
if (argc == 1)
{
printf ("About to call execl (PID %d) ...\n", (int) getpid ());
execl ("/proc/self/exe", argv[0], "execl", NULL);
err (1, "exec");
return 1;
}
else
return 0;
}
It produces:
AMR (PID 110163): 0x0000000000000000
AMR after fork (PID 110164): 0x0000000000000000
AMR (PID 110164): 0x0000000000000000
Allocated key in subprocess (PID 110164): 2
Allocated key (PID 110163): 2
Setting AMR: 0xffffffffffffffff
New AMR value (PID 110163): 0x0c00000000000000
About to call execl (PID 110163) ...
AMR (PID 110163): 0x0c00000000000000
AMR after fork (PID 110165): 0x0000000000000000
AMR (PID 110165): 0x0000000000000000
Allocated key in subprocess (PID 110165): 2
Allocated key (PID 110163): 2
Setting AMR: 0xffffffffffffffff
New AMR value (PID 110163): 0x0c00000000000000
A few things which are odd stand out (apart the wrong default for AMR
and the AMR update restriction covered in the other thread):
* execve does not reset AMR (see after a??About to call execla??)
* fork resets AMR (see lines with PID 110165))
* After execve, a key with non-default access rights is allocated
(see a??Allocated key (PID 110163): 2a??, second time, after execl)
No matter what you think about the AMR default, I posit that each of
those are bugs (although the last one should be fixed by resetting AMR
on execve).
Thanks,
Florian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-19 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 14:27 Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 1:19 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19 1:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-19 5:26 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 20:27 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-19 23:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20 6:04 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-20 6:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-05-20 19:11 ` Ram Pai
2018-05-21 11:29 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-03 20:18 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 10:12 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 14:01 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 17:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-04 19:02 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-04 21:00 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 2:34 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-08 5:53 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 10:15 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 10:44 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 12:54 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 12:57 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 13:49 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-08 13:51 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08 14:17 ` Michal Suchánek
2018-06-11 17:23 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-11 17:29 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11 20:08 ` Ram Pai
2018-06-12 12:17 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 5:12 ` Florian Weimer
2018-05-19 11:11 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e640be-3d82-c955-fc28-568ec13d378a@redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox