From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
jarkko@kernel.org, amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, david@redhat.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, ira.weiny@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 16/16] KVM: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 20:05:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4516f68-3451-4bae-ae0e-c69aaa4ad939@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EHjTyfrPw0FEfaiAkmDhyE1N9hm1fXoFwKrbxv3kiPiyZQaA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Fuad,
On 6/4/25 7:48 PM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 10:20, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/28/25 4:02 AM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
>>> Expand the guest_memfd selftests to include testing mapping guest
>>> memory for VM types that support it.
>>>
>>> Also, build the guest_memfd selftest for arm64.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
>>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 162 +++++++++++++++---
>>> 2 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> The test case fails on 64KB host, and the file size in test_create_guest_memfd_multiple()
>> would be page_size and (2 * page_size). The fixed size 4096 and 8192 aren't aligned to 64KB.
>
> Yes, however, this patch didn't introduce or modify this test. I think
> it's better to fix it in a separate patch independent of this series.
>
Yeah, it can be separate patch or a preparatory patch before PATCH[16/16]
of this series because x86 hasn't 64KB page size. The currently fixed sizes
(4096 and 8192) are aligned to page size on x86. and 'guest-memfd-test' is
enabled on arm64 by this series.
>> # ./guest_memfd_test
>> Random seed: 0x6b8b4567
>> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
>> guest_memfd_test.c:178: fd1 != -1
>> pid=7565 tid=7565 errno=22 - Invalid argument
>> 1 0x000000000040252f: test_create_guest_memfd_multiple at guest_memfd_test.c:178
>> 2 (inlined by) test_with_type at guest_memfd_test.c:231
>> 3 0x00000000004020c7: main at guest_memfd_test.c:306
>> 4 0x0000ffff8cec733f: ?? ??:0
>> 5 0x0000ffff8cec7417: ?? ??:0
>> 6 0x00000000004021ef: _start at ??:?
>> memfd creation should succeed
>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
>>> index f62b0a5aba35..ccf95ed037c3 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += access_tracking_perf_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += arch_timer
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += coalesced_io_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += dirty_log_perf_test
>>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += guest_memfd_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += get-reg-list
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += memslot_modification_stress_test
>>> TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += memslot_perf_test
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
>>> index ce687f8d248f..3d6765bc1f28 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
>>> @@ -34,12 +34,46 @@ static void test_file_read_write(int fd)
>>> "pwrite on a guest_mem fd should fail");
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void test_mmap(int fd, size_t page_size)
>>> +static void test_mmap_allowed(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
>>> +{
>>> + const char val = 0xaa;
>>> + char *mem;
>>> + size_t i;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmaping() guest memory should pass.");
>>> +
>>
>> If you agree, I think it would be nice to ensure guest-memfd doesn't support
>> copy-on-write, more details are provided below.
>
> Good idea. I think we can do this without adding much more code. I'll
> add a check in test_mmap_allowed(), since the idea is, even if mmap()
> is supported, we still can't COW. I'll rename the functions to make
> this a bit clearer (i.e., supported instead of allowed).
>
> Thank you for this and thank you for the reviews!
>
Sounds good to me :)
>
>>> + memset(mem, val, total_size);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < total_size; i++)
>>> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], val);
>>> +
>>> + ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, 0,
>>> + page_size);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate the first page should succeed");
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < page_size; i++)
>>> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], 0x00);
>>> + for (; i < total_size; i++)
>>> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], val);
>>> +
>>> + memset(mem, val, page_size);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < total_size; i++)
>>> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], val);
>>> +
>>> + ret = munmap(mem, total_size);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "munmap should succeed");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void test_mmap_denied(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
>>> {
>>> char *mem;
>>>
>>> mem = mmap(NULL, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>>> TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem, MAP_FAILED);
>>> +
>>> + mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem, MAP_FAILED);
>>> }
>>
>> Add one more argument to test_mmap_denied as the flags passed to mmap().
>>
>> static void test_mmap_denied(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size, int mmap_flags)
>> {
>> mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, mmap_flags, fd, 0);
>> }
>>
>>>
>>> static void test_file_size(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
>>> @@ -120,26 +154,19 @@ static void test_invalid_punch_hole(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void test_create_guest_memfd_invalid(struct kvm_vm *vm)
>>> +static void test_create_guest_memfd_invalid_sizes(struct kvm_vm *vm,
>>> + uint64_t guest_memfd_flags,
>>> + size_t page_size)
>>> {
>>> - size_t page_size = getpagesize();
>>> - uint64_t flag;
>>> size_t size;
>>> int fd;
>>>
>>> for (size = 1; size < page_size; size++) {
>>> - fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, size, 0);
>>> - TEST_ASSERT(fd == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
>>> + fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, size, guest_memfd_flags);
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(fd < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
>>> "guest_memfd() with non-page-aligned page size '0x%lx' should fail with EINVAL",
>>> size);
>>> }
>>> -
>>> - for (flag = BIT(0); flag; flag <<= 1) {
>>> - fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, page_size, flag);
>>> - TEST_ASSERT(fd == -1 && errno == EINVAL,
>>> - "guest_memfd() with flag '0x%lx' should fail with EINVAL",
>>> - flag);
>>> - }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void test_create_guest_memfd_multiple(struct kvm_vm *vm)
>>> @@ -170,30 +197,123 @@ static void test_create_guest_memfd_multiple(struct kvm_vm *vm)
>>> close(fd1);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>> +#define GUEST_MEMFD_TEST_SLOT 10
>>> +#define GUEST_MEMFD_TEST_GPA 0x100000000
>>> +
>>> +static bool check_vm_type(unsigned long vm_type)
>>> {
>>> - size_t page_size;
>>> + /*
>>> + * Not all architectures support KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES. However, those that
>>> + * support guest_memfd have that support for the default VM type.
>>> + */
>>> + if (vm_type == VM_TYPE_DEFAULT)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> + return kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(vm_type);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void test_with_type(unsigned long vm_type, uint64_t guest_memfd_flags,
>>> + bool expect_mmap_allowed)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
>>> size_t total_size;
>>> + size_t page_size;
>>> int fd;
>>> - struct kvm_vm *vm;
>>>
>>> - TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD));
>>> + if (!check_vm_type(vm_type))
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> page_size = getpagesize();
>>> total_size = page_size * 4;
>>>
>>> - vm = vm_create_barebones();
>>> + vm = vm_create_barebones_type(vm_type);
>>>
>>> - test_create_guest_memfd_invalid(vm);
>>> test_create_guest_memfd_multiple(vm);
>>> + test_create_guest_memfd_invalid_sizes(vm, guest_memfd_flags, page_size);
>>>
>>> - fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, total_size, 0);
>>> + fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, total_size, guest_memfd_flags);
>>>
>>> test_file_read_write(fd);
>>> - test_mmap(fd, page_size);
>>> +
>>> + if (expect_mmap_allowed)
>>> + test_mmap_allowed(fd, page_size, total_size);
>>> + else
>>> + test_mmap_denied(fd, page_size, total_size);
>>> +
>>
>> if (expect_mmap_allowed) {
>> test_mmap_denied(fd, page_size, total_size, MAP_PRIVATE);
>> test_mmap_allowed(fd, page_size, total_size);
>> } else {
>> test_mmap_denied(fd, page_size, total_size, MAP_SHARED);
>> }
>>
>>> test_file_size(fd, page_size, total_size);
>>> test_fallocate(fd, page_size, total_size);
>>> test_invalid_punch_hole(fd, page_size, total_size);
>>>
>>> close(fd);
>>> + kvm_vm_release(vm);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(unsigned long vm_type,
>>> + uint64_t expected_valid_flags)
>>> +{
>>> + size_t page_size = getpagesize();
>>> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
>>> + uint64_t flag = 0;
>>> + int fd;
>>> +
>>> + if (!check_vm_type(vm_type))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + vm = vm_create_barebones_type(vm_type);
>>> +
>>> + for (flag = BIT(0); flag; flag <<= 1) {
>>> + fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, page_size, flag);
>>> +
>>> + if (flag & expected_valid_flags) {
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(fd >= 0,
>>> + "guest_memfd() with flag '0x%lx' should be valid",
>>> + flag);
>>> + close(fd);
>>> + } else {
>>> + TEST_ASSERT(fd < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
>>> + "guest_memfd() with flag '0x%lx' should fail with EINVAL",
>>> + flag);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + kvm_vm_release(vm);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void test_gmem_flag_validity(void)
>>> +{
>>> + uint64_t non_coco_vm_valid_flags = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM))
>>> + non_coco_vm_valid_flags = GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_SUPPORT_SHARED;
>>> +
>>> + test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(VM_TYPE_DEFAULT, non_coco_vm_valid_flags);
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef __x86_64__
>>> + test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM, non_coco_vm_valid_flags);
>>> + test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(KVM_X86_SEV_VM, 0);
>>> + test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, 0);
>>> + test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(KVM_X86_SNP_VM, 0);
>>> + test_vm_type_gmem_flag_validity(KVM_X86_TDX_VM, 0);
>>> +#endif
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>> +{
>>> + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD));
>>> +
>>> + test_gmem_flag_validity();
>>> +
>>> + test_with_type(VM_TYPE_DEFAULT, 0, false);
>>> + if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM)) {
>>> + test_with_type(VM_TYPE_DEFAULT, GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_SUPPORT_SHARED,
>>> + true);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef __x86_64__
>>> + test_with_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM, 0, false);
>>> + if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM)) {
>>> + test_with_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM,
>>> + GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_SUPPORT_SHARED, true);
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 18:02 [PATCH v10 00/16] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 01/16] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GMEM Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:05 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-05 8:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 02/16] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_GMEM_POPULATE Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:07 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-05 8:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 03/16] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_has_private_mem() to kvm_arch_supports_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:12 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-05 8:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 04/16] KVM: x86: Rename kvm->arch.has_private_mem to kvm->arch.supports_gmem Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:13 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-05 8:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 05/16] KVM: Rename kvm_slot_can_be_private() to kvm_slot_has_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:13 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-05 8:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 06/16] KVM: Fix comments that refer to slots_lock Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:14 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-05 8:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 07/16] KVM: Fix comment that refers to kvm uapi header path Fuad Tabba
2025-05-31 19:19 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-02 10:10 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-02 10:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 9:00 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 8:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 08/16] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-05-28 23:17 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-02 10:05 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-02 10:43 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-02 11:13 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 6:02 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-04 8:37 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 12:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 12:32 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-05 6:40 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 8:25 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 9:53 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 8:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-05 8:44 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 09/16] KVM: guest_memfd: Track shared memory support in memslot Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 12:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 12:31 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 10/16] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle guest page faults for guest_memfd with shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 11/16] KVM: x86: Compute max_mapping_level with input from guest_memfd Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 13:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 12/16] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 6:05 ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 13/16] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 13:30 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 14/16] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 13:31 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 15/16] KVM: Introduce the KVM capability KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 9:59 ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-27 18:02 ` [PATCH v10 16/16] KVM: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 9:19 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-04 9:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-04 10:05 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2025-06-04 10:25 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4516f68-3451-4bae-ae0e-c69aaa4ad939@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox