From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory-failure: introduce "hwpoisoned-pages" entry
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 16:19:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c436f65d-d219-d2a5-0275-462b3a10879e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66c43dac-32ac-5801-c76c-01607d68e38b@redhat.com>
On 2022/6/14 15:13, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> &hwpoisoned_pages);
>>
>> I'm not sure how useful this interface from userspace (controlling test process
>> with this?). Do we really need to expose this to userspace?
>>
>>
>> TBH I feel that another approach like below is more desirable:
>>
>> - define a new flag in "enum mf_flags" (for example named MF_SW_SIMULATED),
>> - set the flag when calling memory_failure() from the three callers
>> mentioned above,
>> - define a global variable (typed bool) in mm/memory_failure.c_to show that
>> the system has experienced a real hardware memory error events.
>> - once memory_failure() is called without MF_SW_SIMULATED, the new global
>> bool variable is set, and afterward unpoison_memory always fails with
>> -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Exactly what I had in mind.
This approach should be more straightforward. ;)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-14 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 4:38 [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/memory-failure: don't allow to unpoison hw corrupted page zhenwei pi
2022-06-14 4:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory-failure: introduce "hwpoisoned-pages" entry zhenwei pi
2022-06-14 5:12 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-14 7:09 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-06-14 7:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-14 7:23 ` [External] " zhenwei pi
2022-06-14 8:19 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-06-14 4:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/memory-failure: disable unpoison once hw error happens zhenwei pi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c436f65d-d219-d2a5-0275-462b3a10879e@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=pizhenwei@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox