From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rohan Puri <rohan.puri15@gmail.com>,
Mcgrof Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
"Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios.
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:32:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c42a6c9f-7d45-428c-95b9-98367ddba9d3@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202161554.565023-2-zi.yan@sent.com>
On 2/2/24 17:15, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> migrate_pages() supports >0 order folio migration and during compaction,
> even if compaction_alloc() cannot provide >0 order free pages,
> migrate_pages() can split the source page and try to migrate the base pages
> from the split. It can be a baseline and start point for adding support for
> compacting >0 order folios.
>
> Suggested-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 4add68d40e8d..e43e898d2c77 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -816,6 +816,21 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct compact_control *cc)
> return too_many;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * 1. if the page order is larger than or equal to target_order (i.e.,
> + * cc->order and when it is not -1 for global compaction), skip it since
> + * target_order already indicates no free page with larger than target_order
> + * exists and later migrating it will most likely fail;
> + *
> + * 2. compacting > pageblock_order pages does not improve memory fragmentation,
> + * skip them;
> + */
> +static bool skip_isolation_on_order(int order, int target_order)
> +{
> + return (target_order != -1 && order >= target_order) ||
> + order >= pageblock_order;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * isolate_migratepages_block() - isolate all migrate-able pages within
> * a single pageblock
> @@ -1010,7 +1025,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> /*
> * Regardless of being on LRU, compound pages such as THP and
> * hugetlbfs are not to be compacted unless we are attempting
> - * an allocation much larger than the huge page size (eg CMA).
> + * an allocation larger than the compound page size.
> * We can potentially save a lot of iterations if we skip them
> * at once. The check is racy, but we can consider only valid
> * values and the only danger is skipping too much.
> @@ -1018,11 +1033,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> if (PageCompound(page) && !cc->alloc_contig) {
> const unsigned int order = compound_order(page);
>
> - if (likely(order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER)) {
> - low_pfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
> - nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1;
> + /*
> + * Skip based on page order and compaction target order
> + * and skip hugetlbfs pages.
> + */
> + if (skip_isolation_on_order(order, cc->order) ||
> + PageHuge(page)) {
Hm I'd try to avoid a new PageHuge() test here.
Earlier we have a block that does
if (PageHuge(page) && cc->alloc_contig) {
...
think I'd rather rewrite it to handle the PageHuge() case completely and
just make it skip the 1UL << order pages there for !cc->alloc_config. Even
if it means duplicating a bit of the low_pfn and nr_scanned bumping code.
Which reminds me the PageHuge() check there is probably still broken ATM:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/8fa1c95c-4749-33dd-42ba-243e492ab109@suse.cz/
Even better reason not to add another one.
If the huge page materialized since the first check, we should bail out when
testing PageLRU later anyway.
> + if (order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER) {
> + low_pfn += (1UL << order) - 1;
> + nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1;
> + }
> + goto isolate_fail;
> }
> - goto isolate_fail;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1165,10 +1187,11 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> }
>
> /*
> - * folio become large since the non-locked check,
> - * and it's on LRU.
> + * Check LRU folio order under the lock
> */
> - if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio) && !cc->alloc_contig)) {
> + if (unlikely(skip_isolation_on_order(folio_order(folio),
> + cc->order) &&
> + !cc->alloc_contig)) {
> low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
> nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
> folio_set_lru(folio);
> @@ -1786,6 +1809,10 @@ static struct folio *compaction_alloc(struct folio *src, unsigned long data)
> struct compact_control *cc = (struct compact_control *)data;
> struct folio *dst;
>
> + /* this makes migrate_pages() split the source page and retry */
> + if (folio_test_large(src) > 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (list_empty(&cc->freepages)) {
> isolate_freepages(cc);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 16:15 [PATCH v3 0/3] Enable >0 order folio memory compaction Zi Yan
2024-02-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios Zi Yan
2024-02-09 14:32 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-02-09 19:25 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 20:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 20:44 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio memory compaction Zi Yan
2024-02-09 16:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 19:36 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 19:40 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 20:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 20:47 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 21:58 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-02 16:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/compaction: optimize >0 order folio compaction with free page split Zi Yan
2024-02-09 18:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 19:57 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-09 20:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-02 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Enable >0 order folio memory compaction Luis Chamberlain
2024-02-02 20:12 ` Zi Yan
2024-02-05 8:16 ` Baolin Wang
2024-02-05 14:18 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c42a6c9f-7d45-428c-95b9-98367ddba9d3@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rohan.puri15@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox