From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/madvise: Add MF_ACTION_REQUIRED to madvise(MADV_HWPOISON)
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 12:54:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c37e5aac-3bc7-4013-b58a-e29c6bfbfd1f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c7dbf7d-dcb6-f9f2-4a2a-9700ea465a47@huawei.com>
On 5/5/2024 12:02 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2024/5/2 7:24, Jane Chu wrote:
>> The soft hwpoison injector via madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) operates in
>> a synchrous way in a sense, the injector is also a process under
>> test, and should it have the poisoned page mapped in its address
>> space, it should legitimately get killed as much as in a real UE
>> situation.
> Will it be better to add a method to set MF_ACTION_REQUIRED explicitly when inject soft hwpoison?
> Thanks.
So the first question is: Is there a need to preserve the existing
behavior of madvise(MADV_HWPOISON)?
The madvise(2) man page says -
*MADV_HWPOISON *(since Linux 2.6.32)
Poison the pages in the range specified by/addr/ and/length/
and handle subsequent references to those pages like a
hardware memory corruption. This operation is available
only for privileged (*CAP_SYS_ADMIN*) processes. This
operation may result in the calling process receiving a
*SIGBUS *and the page being unmapped.
This feature is intended for testing of memory error-
handling code; it is available only if the kernel was
configured with*CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE*.
And the impression from my reading is that: there doesn't seem to be a need.
A couple observations -
- The man page states that the calling process may receive a SIGBUS and the page being unmapped.
But the existing behavior is no SIGBUS unless MCE early kill is elected, so it doesn't quite match
the man page.
- There is 'hwpoison-inject' which behaves similar to the existing madvise(MADV_HWPOISON), that is,
soft inject without MF_ACTION_REQUIRED flag.
thanks,
-jane
> .
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 1a073fcc4c0c..eaeae5252c02 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
>> } else {
>> pr_info("Injecting memory failure for pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
>> pfn, start);
>> - ret = memory_failure(pfn, MF_COUNT_INCREASED | MF_SW_SIMULATED);
>> + ret = memory_failure(pfn, MF_ACTION_REQUIRED | MF_COUNT_INCREASED | MF_SW_SIMULATED);
>> if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> ret = 0;
>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 23:24 [PATCH 0/3] Enhance soft hwpoison handling and injection Jane Chu
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed Jane Chu
2024-05-07 9:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-07 17:54 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08 12:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-08 16:51 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08 7:47 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 16:58 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09 2:54 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-09 16:40 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/madvise: Add MF_ACTION_REQUIRED to madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) Jane Chu
2024-05-05 7:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-06 19:54 ` Jane Chu [this message]
2024-05-08 7:58 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure: send SIGBUS in the event of thp split fail Jane Chu
2024-05-05 7:00 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-06 20:26 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08 8:08 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 17:45 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09 8:30 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-09 15:34 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-10 2:59 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-10 3:18 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08 9:03 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 16:56 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09 8:52 ` Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c37e5aac-3bc7-4013-b58a-e29c6bfbfd1f@oracle.com \
--to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox