linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/madvise: Add MF_ACTION_REQUIRED to madvise(MADV_HWPOISON)
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 12:54:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c37e5aac-3bc7-4013-b58a-e29c6bfbfd1f@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c7dbf7d-dcb6-f9f2-4a2a-9700ea465a47@huawei.com>

On 5/5/2024 12:02 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:

> On 2024/5/2 7:24, Jane Chu wrote:
>> The soft hwpoison injector via madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) operates in
>> a synchrous way in a sense, the injector is also a process under
>> test, and should it have the poisoned page mapped in its address
>> space, it should legitimately get killed as much as in a real UE
>> situation.
> Will it be better to add a method to set MF_ACTION_REQUIRED explicitly when inject soft hwpoison?
> Thanks.

So the first question is: Is there a need to preserve the existing 
behavior of  madvise(MADV_HWPOISON)?

The madvise(2) man page says -

        *MADV_HWPOISON *(since Linux 2.6.32)
               Poison the pages in the range specified by/addr/  and/length/
               and handle subsequent references to those pages like a
               hardware memory corruption.  This operation is available
               only for privileged (*CAP_SYS_ADMIN*) processes.  This
               operation may result in the calling process receiving a
               *SIGBUS *and the page being unmapped.

               This feature is intended for testing of memory error-
               handling code; it is available only if the kernel was
               configured with*CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE*.

And the impression from my reading is that: there doesn't seem to be a need.

A couple observations -
- The man page states that the calling process may receive a SIGBUS and the page being unmapped.
But the existing behavior is no SIGBUS unless MCE early kill is elected, so it doesn't quite match
the man page.
- There is 'hwpoison-inject' which behaves similar to the existing madvise(MADV_HWPOISON), that is,
soft inject without MF_ACTION_REQUIRED flag.

thanks,
-jane

> .
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 1a073fcc4c0c..eaeae5252c02 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
>>   		} else {
>>   			pr_info("Injecting memory failure for pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
>>   				 pfn, start);
>> -			ret = memory_failure(pfn, MF_COUNT_INCREASED | MF_SW_SIMULATED);
>> +			ret = memory_failure(pfn, MF_ACTION_REQUIRED | MF_COUNT_INCREASED | MF_SW_SIMULATED);
>>   			if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>>   				ret = 0;
>>   		}
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-06 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-01 23:24 [PATCH 0/3] Enhance soft hwpoison handling and injection Jane Chu
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed Jane Chu
2024-05-07  9:02   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-07 17:54     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08 12:06       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-08 16:51         ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  7:47   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 16:58     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09  2:54   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-09 16:40     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/madvise: Add MF_ACTION_REQUIRED to madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) Jane Chu
2024-05-05  7:02   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-06 19:54     ` Jane Chu [this message]
2024-05-08  7:58       ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure: send SIGBUS in the event of thp split fail Jane Chu
2024-05-05  7:00   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-06 20:26     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  8:08       ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 17:45         ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09  8:30           ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-09 15:34             ` Jane Chu
2024-05-10  2:59               ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-10  3:18                 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  9:03   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 16:56     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09  8:52       ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c37e5aac-3bc7-4013-b58a-e29c6bfbfd1f@oracle.com \
    --to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox