Re: [PATCH V4 13/45] block: blk-merge: try to make front segments in full size

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>]

On 18.12.2017 15:22, Ming Lei wrote:
> When merging one bvec into segment, if the bvec is too big
> to merge, current policy is to move the whole bvec into another
> new segment.
> 
> This patchset changes the policy into trying to maximize size of
> front segments, that means in above situation, part of bvec
> is merged into current segment, and the remainder is put
> into next segment.
> 
> This patch prepares for support multipage bvec because
> it can be quite common to see this case and we should try
> to make front segments in full size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-merge.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index a476337a8ff4..42ceb89bc566 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  	bool do_split = true;
>  	struct bio *new = NULL;
>  	const unsigned max_sectors = get_max_io_size(q, bio);
> +	unsigned advance = 0;
>  
>  	bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) {
>  		/*
> @@ -134,12 +135,32 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (bvprvp && blk_queue_cluster(q)) {
> -			if (seg_size + bv.bv_len > queue_max_segment_size(q))
> -				goto new_segment;
>  			if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvprvp, &bv))
>  				goto new_segment;
>  			if (!BIOVEC_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, bvprvp, &bv))
>  				goto new_segment;
> +			if (seg_size + bv.bv_len > queue_max_segment_size(q)) {
> +				/*
> +				 * On assumption is that initial value of
> +				 * @seg_size(equals to bv.bv_len) won't be
> +				 * bigger than max segment size, but will
> +				 * becomes false after multipage bvec comes.
> +				 */
> +				advance = queue_max_segment_size(q) - seg_size;
> +
> +				if (advance > 0) {
> +					seg_size += advance;
> +					sectors += advance >> 9;
> +					bv.bv_len -= advance;
> +					bv.bv_offset += advance;
> +				}
> +
> +				/*
> +				 * Still need to put remainder of current
> +				 * bvec into a new segment.
> +				 */
> +				goto new_segment;
> +			}
>  
>  			seg_size += bv.bv_len;
>  			bvprv = bv;
> @@ -161,6 +182,12 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>  		seg_size = bv.bv_len;
>  		sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
>  
> +		/* restore the bvec for iterator */
> +		if (advance) {
> +			bv.bv_len += advance;
> +			bv.bv_offset -= advance;
> +			advance = 0;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	do_split = false;
> @@ -361,16 +388,29 @@ __blk_segment_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>  {
>  
>  	int nbytes = bvec->bv_len;
> +	unsigned advance = 0;
>  
>  	if (*sg && *cluster) {
> -		if ((*sg)->length + nbytes > queue_max_segment_size(q))
> -			goto new_segment;
> -
>  		if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvprv, bvec))
>  			goto new_segment;
>  		if (!BIOVEC_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, bvprv, bvec))
>  			goto new_segment;
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * try best to merge part of the bvec into previous
> +		 * segment and follow same policy with
> +		 * blk_bio_segment_split()
> +		 */
> +		if ((*sg)->length + nbytes > queue_max_segment_size(q)) {
> +			advance = queue_max_segment_size(q) - (*sg)->length;
> +			if (advance) {
> +				(*sg)->length += advance;
> +				bvec->bv_offset += advance;
> +				bvec->bv_len -= advance;
> +			}
> +			goto new_segment;
> +		}
> +
>  		(*sg)->length += nbytes;
>  	} else {
>  new_segment:
> @@ -393,6 +433,10 @@ __blk_segment_map_sg(struct request_queue *q, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>  
>  		sg_set_page(*sg, bvec->bv_page, nbytes, bvec->bv_offset);
>  		(*nsegs)++;
> +
> +		/* for making iterator happy */
> +		bvec->bv_offset -= advance;
> +		bvec->bv_len += advance;
>  	}
>  	*bvprv = *bvec;
>  }
> 

Hello,

This patch breaks MMC on next-20180108, in particular MMC doesn't work anymore
with this patch on NVIDIA Tegra20:

<3>[   36.622253] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 512
<3>[   36.671233] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk2, sector 128
<3>[   36.711308] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 31325304
<3>[   36.749232] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk2, sector 512
<3>[   36.761235] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 31325816
<3>[   36.832039] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk2, sector 31259768
<3>[   99.793248] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 31323136
<3>[   99.982043] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 929792
<3>[   99.986301] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 930816
<3>[  100.293624] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 932864
<3>[  100.466839] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 947200
<3>[  100.642955] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 949248
<3>[  100.818838] print_req_error: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector 230400

Any attempt of mounting MMC block dev ends with a kernel crash. Reverting this
patch fixes the issue.

-- 
Dmitry

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>