linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, oom: stop reclaiming if GFP_ATOMIC will start failing soon
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:04:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2c2f453-9cb3-72b9-a484-03652e8ce10e@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200425172706.26b5011293e8dc77b1dccaf3@linux-foundation.org>

On 2020/04/26 9:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, what's really going on here?
> 
> Is networking potentially consuming an unbounded amount of memory?  If
> so, then killing a process will just cause networking to consume more
> memory then hit against the same thing.  So presumably the answer is
> "no, the watermarks are inappropriately set for this workload".
Maybe somebody is abusing __GFP_MEMALLOC allocations. David, please include whole
context (e.g. which function from which process) instead of only memory stat lines.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-26  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 20:48 David Rientjes
2020-04-25  0:32 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-04-26  0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-26  3:04   ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2020-04-27  3:12   ` David Rientjes
2020-04-27  5:03     ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-04-27 20:30     ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-27 23:03       ` David Rientjes
2020-04-27 23:35         ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-28  7:43           ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-29  8:31             ` peter enderborg
2020-04-29  9:00               ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-28  9:38       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-28 21:48         ` David Rientjes
2020-04-28 23:37           ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-04-29  7:51           ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-29  9:04             ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-29 10:45               ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-04-29 11:43                 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-27  8:20   ` peter enderborg
2020-04-27 15:01 ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2c2f453-9cb3-72b9-a484-03652e8ce10e@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox