From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB3AC433B4 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD44B6101E for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:15:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CD44B6101E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D9EE86B0036; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D4DAE6B006E; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:15:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BC7986B0070; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:15:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0161.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.161]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F336B0036 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A30A825680C for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78159386886.16.05079A2 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12718E0011C5 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 22:15:00 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: 4FJf9lan20/dL3aE4SZvY7HHw56fh/UdTeONXw+LFqywEqQnUby1uKfcvjUNf0R7q28sr6jATy LH5STAZL1hJQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9989"; a="201137243" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,313,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="201137243" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2021 15:15:00 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 4htN2xJSznuZVhLFhhbfFRkZUb4nixiLBd8DZWgrRmw3SzyxERNbqQvWzA8B9KUhCVR5lyo/+I JW12+IiyJbFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,313,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="467381111" Received: from yyu32-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.169.18]) ([10.209.169.18]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2021 15:14:58 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 26/30] ELF: Introduce arch_setup_elf_property() To: Borislav Petkov Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang , Mark Brown , Catalin Marinas References: <20210427204315.24153-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210427204315.24153-27-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 15:14:58 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 12718E0011C5 Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of yu-cheng.yu@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.24) smtp.mailfrom=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Stat-Signature: zz5c8yka3w9689s35cndkjwodb59mz7k X-HE-Tag: 1621462500-237158 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 5/19/2021 11:10 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 01:43:11PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: >> @@ -1951,6 +1951,8 @@ config X86_SHADOW_STACK >> depends on AS_WRUSS >> depends on ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK >> select ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS >> + select ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY >> + select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE > ^^^^^^^^ > > What's that for? Isn't ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY enough? > ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY is for defining parsing functions, e.g. arch_parse_elf_property(), arch_setup_property(). ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE is for defining "struct arch_elf_state". However, those parsing functions take (struct arch_elf_state *) as an input. It probably makes sense to have ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY dependent on ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE. It would be ok as-is too. ARM people might have other plans in mind. [...] > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h >> index 30f68b42eeb5..24ba55ba8278 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h >> @@ -455,4 +455,13 @@ typedef struct elf64_note { >> /* Bits for GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI */ >> #define GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI (1U << 0) >> >> +/* .note.gnu.property types for x86: */ >> +#define GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND 0xc0000002 > > Why not 0xc0000001? ARM64 is 0xc0000000... > I just looked at the ABI document. ARM has GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_AND 0xc0000000 X86 has: GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_USED 0xc0000000 GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_NEEDED 0xc0000001 GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND 0xc0000002 Yu-cheng