From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pkeys: Support setting access rights for signal handlers
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 07:22:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c220f36f-c04a-50ae-3fd7-2c6245e27057@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f86d79e-165a-1b8e-32dd-7e4e8579da59@redhat.com>
On 12/13/2017 07:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Okay, this model is really quite different from x86. Is there a
> good reason for the difference?
Yes, both implementations are simple and take the "natural" behavior.
x86 changes XSAVE-controlled register values on entering a signal, so we
let them be changed (including PKRU). POWER hardware does not do this
to its PKRU-equivalent, so we do not force it to.
x86 didn't have to do this for *signals*. But, we kinda went on this
trajectory when we decided to clear/restore FPU state on
entering/exiting signals before XSAVE even existed.
FWIW, I do *not* think we have to do this for future XSAVE states. But,
if we do that, we probably need an interface for apps to tell us which
states to save/restore and which state to set upon entering a signal
handler. That's what I was trying to get you to consider instead of
just a one-off hack to fix this for pkeys.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-09 21:16 Florian Weimer
2017-12-10 0:17 ` Dave Hansen
2017-12-10 6:42 ` Florian Weimer
2017-12-11 16:13 ` Dave Hansen
2017-12-12 23:13 ` Ram Pai
2017-12-13 2:14 ` Florian Weimer
2017-12-13 11:35 ` Ram Pai
2017-12-13 15:08 ` Florian Weimer
2017-12-13 15:22 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2017-12-13 15:40 ` Florian Weimer
2017-12-14 0:17 ` Ram Pai
2017-12-14 11:21 ` Florian Weimer
2017-12-16 15:09 ` Ram Pai
2017-12-16 15:25 ` Florian Weimer
2017-12-16 17:20 ` Ram Pai
2017-12-18 11:00 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c220f36f-c04a-50ae-3fd7-2c6245e27057@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox