From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/mm: add VMA locks documentation
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:09:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0f64fa7-81fd-4691-86b5-2ad39ba9d8a7@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1eeQatc0GC_hfOM_mvwjwQ=89JDmp_U5_diLy7ycjEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jann,
On 2024/11/5 05:29, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 5:42 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
[...]
>
> I think it's important to know about the existence of hardware writes
> because it means you need atomic operations when making changes to
> page tables. Like, for example, in many cases when changing a present
> PTE, you can't even use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for PTEs and need
> atomic RMW operations instead - see for example ptep_get_and_clear(),
> which is basically implemented in arch code as an atomic xchg so that
> it can't miss concurrent A/D bit updates.
>
Totally agree! But I noticed before that ptep_clear() doesn't seem
to need atomic operations because it doesn't need to care about the
A/D bit.
I once looked at the history of how the ptep_clear() was introduced.
If you are interested, you can take a look at my local draft below.
Maybe I missed something.
```
mm: pgtable: make ptep_clear() non-atomic
In the generic ptep_get_and_clear() implementation, it is just a simple
combination of ptep_get() and pte_clear(). But for some architectures
(such as x86 and arm64, etc), the hardware will modify the A/D bits
of the
page table entry, so the ptep_get_and_clear() needs to be overwritten
and implemented as an atomic operation to avoid contention, which has a
performance cost.
The commit d283d422c6c4 ("x86: mm: add x86_64 support for page table
check") adds the ptep_clear() on the x86, and makes it call
ptep_get_and_clear() when CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK is enabled. The page
table check feature does not actually care about the A/D bits, so only
ptep_get() + pte_clear() should be called. But considering that the
page
table check is a debug option, this should not have much of an impact.
But then the commit de8c8e52836d ("mm: page_table_check: add hooks to
public helpers") changed ptep_clear() to unconditionally call
ptep_get_and_clear(), so that the CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK check can be
put into the page table check stubs (in
include/linux/page_table_check.h).
This also cause performance loss to the kernel without
CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK enabled, which doesn't make sense.
To fix it, just calling ptep_get() and pte_clear() in the ptep_clear().
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
index 117b807e3f894..2ace92293f5f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -506,7 +506,10 @@ static inline void clear_young_dirty_ptes(struct
vm_area_struct *vma,
static inline void ptep_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
pte_t *ptep)
{
- ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+ pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep);
+
+ pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+ page_table_check_pte_clear(mm, pte);
}
```
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 18:50 Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-01 20:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-01 22:41 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-01 23:48 ` SeongJae Park
2024-11-04 13:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 13:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-04 19:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-02 1:45 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-04 16:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 21:29 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-05 16:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-05 17:21 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-06 3:09 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2024-11-06 18:09 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-07 7:07 ` Qi Zheng
2024-11-06 2:56 ` Qi Zheng
2024-11-06 11:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-07 6:47 ` Qi Zheng
2024-11-02 9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-04 14:17 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 15:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-05 12:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 14:47 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-04 16:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-05 13:56 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-05 14:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 17:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-04 21:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 21:20 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-05 16:11 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 21:25 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-07 11:07 ` Hillf Danton
2024-11-07 11:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0f64fa7-81fd-4691-86b5-2ad39ba9d8a7@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox