linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/mm: add VMA locks documentation
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:09:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0f64fa7-81fd-4691-86b5-2ad39ba9d8a7@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1eeQatc0GC_hfOM_mvwjwQ=89JDmp_U5_diLy7ycjEdQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jann,

On 2024/11/5 05:29, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 5:42 PM Lorenzo Stoakes

[...]

> 
> I think it's important to know about the existence of hardware writes
> because it means you need atomic operations when making changes to
> page tables. Like, for example, in many cases when changing a present
> PTE, you can't even use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for PTEs and need
> atomic RMW operations instead - see for example ptep_get_and_clear(),
> which is basically implemented in arch code as an atomic xchg so that
> it can't miss concurrent A/D bit updates.
> 

Totally agree! But I noticed before that ptep_clear() doesn't seem
to need atomic operations because it doesn't need to care about the
A/D bit.

I once looked at the history of how the ptep_clear() was introduced.
If you are interested, you can take a look at my local draft below.
Maybe I missed something.

```
mm: pgtable: make ptep_clear() non-atomic

     In the generic ptep_get_and_clear() implementation, it is just a simple
     combination of ptep_get() and pte_clear(). But for some architectures
     (such as x86 and arm64, etc), the hardware will modify the A/D bits 
of the
     page table entry, so the ptep_get_and_clear() needs to be overwritten
     and implemented as an atomic operation to avoid contention, which has a
     performance cost.

     The commit d283d422c6c4 ("x86: mm: add x86_64 support for page table
     check") adds the ptep_clear() on the x86, and makes it call
     ptep_get_and_clear() when CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK is enabled. The page
     table check feature does not actually care about the A/D bits, so only
     ptep_get() + pte_clear() should be called. But considering that the 
page
     table check is a debug option, this should not have much of an impact.

     But then the commit de8c8e52836d ("mm: page_table_check: add hooks to
     public helpers") changed ptep_clear() to unconditionally call
     ptep_get_and_clear(), so that the  CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK check can be
     put into the page table check stubs (in 
include/linux/page_table_check.h).
     This also cause performance loss to the kernel without
     CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK enabled, which doesn't make sense.

     To fix it, just calling ptep_get() and pte_clear() in the ptep_clear().

     Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
index 117b807e3f894..2ace92293f5f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -506,7 +506,10 @@ static inline void clear_young_dirty_ptes(struct 
vm_area_struct *vma,
  static inline void ptep_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
                               pte_t *ptep)
  {
-       ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+       pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep);
+
+       pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+       page_table_check_pte_clear(mm, pte);
  }

```

Thanks!



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-06  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-01 18:50 Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-01 20:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-01 22:41   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-01 23:48   ` SeongJae Park
2024-11-04 13:02     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 13:47       ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-04 19:55         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-02  1:45 ` Jann Horn
2024-11-04 16:42   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 21:29     ` Jann Horn
2024-11-05 16:10       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-05 17:21         ` Jann Horn
2024-11-06  3:09       ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2024-11-06 18:09         ` Jann Horn
2024-11-07  7:07           ` Qi Zheng
2024-11-06  2:56     ` Qi Zheng
2024-11-06 11:28       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-07  6:47         ` Qi Zheng
2024-11-02  9:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-04 14:17   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 15:19     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-05 12:23       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 14:47 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-04 16:52   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-05 13:56     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-05 14:18       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 17:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-04 21:04   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 21:20     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-11-05 16:11       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-11-04 21:25     ` Jann Horn
2024-11-07 11:07 ` Hillf Danton
2024-11-07 11:15   ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0f64fa7-81fd-4691-86b5-2ad39ba9d8a7@bytedance.com \
    --to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox