From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0526CCD193 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 111D98E000B; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:54:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0C2998E0002; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:54:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id ECC248E000B; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:54:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D442E8E0002 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 05:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBA3C0BD2 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:24 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83999888448.19.2C5A177 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60D618000E for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OS+9h61n; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=UmzdK07H; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OS+9h61n; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=UmzdK07H; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of vbabka@suse.cz designates 195.135.223.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vbabka@suse.cz; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1760522061; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Vt/jwQJIqk4TwKms5vsSdlLSoJHfVELSvvVKFBDVPE0=; b=RD8seV/SVy7zujmQbNg/MLrpYw9/nzVf6gvaKXb8VdMVFCZTngX1ZPwV3JQarCmgv/xj8f 3wmcM8AeeomG/idK9lnf4LuP309SAQp8r3KTNCUCTGIpZoDLEsOz44AFd6k2feo9peRSFq Dwc/LVpxExKCKzBD6du8yqH0zQIgbWA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OS+9h61n; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=UmzdK07H; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=OS+9h61n; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=UmzdK07H; spf=pass (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of vbabka@suse.cz designates 195.135.223.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vbabka@suse.cz; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1760522061; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ybZ9y6UyRD3fEVyVKVTHyZ2W39Vqe/3M4XHfRFGMoZYrnLI6fdzHPh9gtpbSn8NpSIGOFg GDtbyLZItvTl9qZghrKFECwZYQMpd4Lo8SxzjExKpUArdU/3VaJHcY9SYGqNaUfbA8plPH hEyYqWoBmA3G/VuDhg+gdWKwRihemWM= Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2356A22A49; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1760522059; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=Vt/jwQJIqk4TwKms5vsSdlLSoJHfVELSvvVKFBDVPE0=; b=OS+9h61ne/3vTkJUa2tFZEPet65UCbtb3rXEvCGXJ7j/F13ARH0oRVo+4SrwIZzLCXo8Po O80W8TEUyOM3ldmZEId1WEIWnhatHYY0PuRhZkBWyyIueOJKLFULG8YdQh+1O36yTc0HWl BbmuYmeXsDZPWsKQEwyfUk+w8ks/Mrc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1760522059; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=Vt/jwQJIqk4TwKms5vsSdlLSoJHfVELSvvVKFBDVPE0=; b=UmzdK07HNGSDMW4KYQtUa8sCM6tCxRhcJkuAnmhkF3PKpefF8oYMv3QF3k+JBbnNBq0w/P j4GsjXI7qSkd47Bg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1760522059; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=Vt/jwQJIqk4TwKms5vsSdlLSoJHfVELSvvVKFBDVPE0=; b=OS+9h61ne/3vTkJUa2tFZEPet65UCbtb3rXEvCGXJ7j/F13ARH0oRVo+4SrwIZzLCXo8Po O80W8TEUyOM3ldmZEId1WEIWnhatHYY0PuRhZkBWyyIueOJKLFULG8YdQh+1O36yTc0HWl BbmuYmeXsDZPWsKQEwyfUk+w8ks/Mrc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1760522059; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=Vt/jwQJIqk4TwKms5vsSdlLSoJHfVELSvvVKFBDVPE0=; b=UmzdK07HNGSDMW4KYQtUa8sCM6tCxRhcJkuAnmhkF3PKpefF8oYMv3QF3k+JBbnNBq0w/P j4GsjXI7qSkd47Bg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED79713A42; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id gwWnOUpv72g1cgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:54:18 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:54:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] slab: Add check for memcg_data != OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL in folio_memcg_kmem Content-Language: en-US To: Harry Yoo , Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Hao Ge , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hao Ge References: <20251014152751.499376-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> From: Vlastimil Babka Autocrypt: addr=vbabka@suse.cz; keydata= xsFNBFZdmxYBEADsw/SiUSjB0dM+vSh95UkgcHjzEVBlby/Fg+g42O7LAEkCYXi/vvq31JTB KxRWDHX0R2tgpFDXHnzZcQywawu8eSq0LxzxFNYMvtB7sV1pxYwej2qx9B75qW2plBs+7+YB 87tMFA+u+L4Z5xAzIimfLD5EKC56kJ1CsXlM8S/LHcmdD9Ctkn3trYDNnat0eoAcfPIP2OZ+ 9oe9IF/R28zmh0ifLXyJQQz5ofdj4bPf8ecEW0rhcqHfTD8k4yK0xxt3xW+6Exqp9n9bydiy tcSAw/TahjW6yrA+6JhSBv1v2tIm+itQc073zjSX8OFL51qQVzRFr7H2UQG33lw2QrvHRXqD Ot7ViKam7v0Ho9wEWiQOOZlHItOOXFphWb2yq3nzrKe45oWoSgkxKb97MVsQ+q2SYjJRBBH4 8qKhphADYxkIP6yut/eaj9ImvRUZZRi0DTc8xfnvHGTjKbJzC2xpFcY0DQbZzuwsIZ8OPJCc LM4S7mT25NE5kUTG/TKQCk922vRdGVMoLA7dIQrgXnRXtyT61sg8PG4wcfOnuWf8577aXP1x 6mzw3/jh3F+oSBHb/GcLC7mvWreJifUL2gEdssGfXhGWBo6zLS3qhgtwjay0Jl+kza1lo+Cv BB2T79D4WGdDuVa4eOrQ02TxqGN7G0Biz5ZLRSFzQSQwLn8fbwARAQABzSBWbGFzdGltaWwg QmFia2EgPHZiYWJrYUBzdXNlLmN6PsLBlAQTAQoAPgIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIe AQIXgBYhBKlA1DSZLC6OmRA9UCJPp+fMgqZkBQJnyBr8BQka0IFQAAoJECJPp+fMgqZkqmMQ AIbGN95ptUMUvo6aAdhxaOCHXp1DfIBuIOK/zpx8ylY4pOwu3GRe4dQ8u4XS9gaZ96Gj4bC+ jwWcSmn+TjtKW3rH1dRKopvC07tSJIGGVyw7ieV/5cbFffA8NL0ILowzVg8w1ipnz1VTkWDr 2zcfslxJsJ6vhXw5/npcY0ldeC1E8f6UUoa4eyoskd70vO0wOAoGd02ZkJoox3F5ODM0kjHu Y97VLOa3GG66lh+ZEelVZEujHfKceCw9G3PMvEzyLFbXvSOigZQMdKzQ8D/OChwqig8wFBmV QCPS4yDdmZP3oeDHRjJ9jvMUKoYODiNKsl2F+xXwyRM2qoKRqFlhCn4usVd1+wmv9iLV8nPs 2Db1ZIa49fJet3Sk3PN4bV1rAPuWvtbuTBN39Q/6MgkLTYHb84HyFKw14Rqe5YorrBLbF3rl M51Dpf6Egu1yTJDHCTEwePWug4XI11FT8lK0LNnHNpbhTCYRjX73iWOnFraJNcURld1jL1nV r/LRD+/e2gNtSTPK0Qkon6HcOBZnxRoqtazTU6YQRmGlT0v+rukj/cn5sToYibWLn+RoV1CE Qj6tApOiHBkpEsCzHGu+iDQ1WT0Idtdynst738f/uCeCMkdRu4WMZjteQaqvARFwCy3P/jpK uvzMtves5HvZw33ZwOtMCgbpce00DaET4y/UzsBNBFsZNTUBCACfQfpSsWJZyi+SHoRdVyX5 J6rI7okc4+b571a7RXD5UhS9dlVRVVAtrU9ANSLqPTQKGVxHrqD39XSw8hxK61pw8p90pg4G /N3iuWEvyt+t0SxDDkClnGsDyRhlUyEWYFEoBrrCizbmahOUwqkJbNMfzj5Y7n7OIJOxNRkB IBOjPdF26dMP69BwePQao1M8Acrrex9sAHYjQGyVmReRjVEtv9iG4DoTsnIR3amKVk6si4Ea X/mrapJqSCcBUVYUFH8M7bsm4CSxier5ofy8jTEa/CfvkqpKThTMCQPNZKY7hke5qEq1CBk2 wxhX48ZrJEFf1v3NuV3OimgsF2odzieNABEBAAHCwXwEGAEKACYCGwwWIQSpQNQ0mSwujpkQ PVAiT6fnzIKmZAUCZ8gcVAUJFhTonwAKCRAiT6fnzIKmZLY8D/9uo3Ut9yi2YCuASWxr7QQZ lJCViArjymbxYB5NdOeC50/0gnhK4pgdHlE2MdwF6o34x7TPFGpjNFvycZqccSQPJ/gibwNA zx3q9vJT4Vw+YbiyS53iSBLXMweeVV1Jd9IjAoL+EqB0cbxoFXvnjkvP1foiiF5r73jCd4PR rD+GoX5BZ7AZmFYmuJYBm28STM2NA6LhT0X+2su16f/HtummENKcMwom0hNu3MBNPUOrujtW khQrWcJNAAsy4yMoJ2Lw51T/5X5Hc7jQ9da9fyqu+phqlVtn70qpPvgWy4HRhr25fCAEXZDp xG4RNmTm+pqorHOqhBkI7wA7P/nyPo7ZEc3L+ZkQ37u0nlOyrjbNUniPGxPxv1imVq8IyycG AN5FaFxtiELK22gvudghLJaDiRBhn8/AhXc642/Z/yIpizE2xG4KU4AXzb6C+o7LX/WmmsWP Ly6jamSg6tvrdo4/e87lUedEqCtrp2o1xpn5zongf6cQkaLZKQcBQnPmgHO5OG8+50u88D9I rywqgzTUhHFKKF6/9L/lYtrNcHU8Z6Y4Ju/MLUiNYkmtrGIMnkjKCiRqlRrZE/v5YFHbayRD dJKXobXTtCBYpLJM4ZYRpGZXne/FAtWNe4KbNJJqxMvrTOrnIatPj8NhBVI0RSJRsbilh6TE m6M14QORSWTLRg== In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E60D618000E X-Stat-Signature: 1ne79qbcs8i7zf1ue9zuhm5w3izq3ipz X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1760522060-836304 X-HE-Meta: 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 neSudHuY r0sY2Dzb0WuMiidxLs1sxD/UJFfvpjXjcrbU9iPHjWUAQQweQ2oCzKycXmNmw7frBuBsH8b4zesN2tsD3GMN3ZtQVJEffdcL/dM3QBG2eUXAsuZ+3WebCxXCy1xCrG5Pn431IUGIfAZNEMBs8vBqLTmjnjWfHMp4yUxqPPFhaM5Ty3248ddnPRVieJWsVC+qA5LuqnxRLQqi01bIllrk8cFNAE4rxMUhxE4pvGRiMlAI/0tjXzZ85qrnqLwFTInR52jyg2ymmMg+U0aNAsYhDMcXWn/blwqmhAJk9D2zcOnfk0TojBwJQIkUIOu0Sa0B5r2dlfBBpaFidxMlUpZUTJ6/4CWgBkuPEzd25tNs2hV+218nfAeYZ6uYNigefCgoXWKssM2fGgWFXNqP4Y6krFV2+zQtbi2CMvdF5uW1tpEy1OABXxm1UUQzRgJJpGiDGdzH8 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 10/15/25 11:25, Harry Yoo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 09:12:43AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:28 AM Hao Ge wrote: >> > >> > From: Hao Ge >> > >> > Since OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL and MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS currently share >> > the same bit position, we cannot determine whether memcg_data still >> > points to the slabobj_ext vector simply by checking >> > folio->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS. >> > >> > If obj_exts allocation failed, slab->obj_exts is set to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL, >> > and during the release of the associated folio, the BUG check is triggered >> > because it was mistakenly assumed that a valid folio->memcg_data >> > was not cleared before freeing the folio. > > nit: yesterday I was confused that this is sanity checks in buddy complaining > folio->memcg_data not being cleared, but it's actually folio_memcg_kmem() > complaining that MEMCG_OBJEXTS_DATA flag is set on non-slab folios (in > free_pages_prepare(), if PageMemcgKmem(page) -> __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page())) > So the paragraph above should be updated? > > And as a side question, we clear slab->obj_exts when freeing obj_ext array, > but don't clear OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL when freeing a slab? That's not good. Hm great point. We should rather make sure it's cleared always, instead of adjusting the debugging check, which shouldn't be then necessary, right? >> > So let's check for memcg_data != OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL in folio_memcg_kmem. >> > >> > Fixes: 7612833192d5 ("slab: Reuse first bit for OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL") >> > Suggested-by: Harry Yoo >> > Signed-off-by: Hao Ge >> >> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan >> >> nit: I think it would be helpful if the changelog explained why we >> need the additional check. We can have the same bit set in two >> different situations: >> 1. object extension vector allocation failure; >> 2. memcg_data pointing to a valid mem_cgroup. >> To distinguish between them, we need to check not only the bit itself >> but also the rest of this field. If the rest is NULL, we have case 1, >> otherwise case 2. > > Agreed. > > In general LGTM, > Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo > > By the way, maybe it'd be nice to introduce a new helper function that > properly checks MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS flag. I thought so too at first... >> ~/slab (slab/for-next-fixes)> git grep -n MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:337: MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS = (1UL << 0), >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:344:#define __OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:358: * MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS. > >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:400: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS, folio); >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:421: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS, folio); > > these two, > >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:492: if (memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS) > > this, > >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:538: (folio->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS), >> include/linux/memcontrol.h:1491: * if MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS is set. >> mm/kfence/core.c:624: MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS; > >> mm/page_owner.c:513: if (memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS) > > this, > >> mm/slab.h:541: * MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS bit set or be equal to OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL. >> mm/slab.h:543: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(obj_exts && !(obj_exts & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS) && >> mm/slub.c:2137: new_exts |= MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS; >> tools/mm/show_page_info.py:55: MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS = prog.constant("MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS").value_() > >> tools/mm/show_page_info.py:59: if memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS: > > and this do not look good. > > I mean technically they are fine since OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL is set on > slabs only, but that's just a coincidence. And checked the the other debugging checks too. But then thought it's better that if these are not expected to see slabs, then they should not be adjusted. I don't see it as a coincidence but as intention to keep it slab specific. It will be also more future proof for the upcoming separation of struct slab from struct page. >> > --- >> > v3: Simplify the solution, per Harry's suggestion in the v1 comments >> > Add Suggested-by: Harry Yoo >> > --- >> > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 +++- >> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h >> > index 873e510d6f8d..7ed15f858dc4 100644 >> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h >> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h >> > @@ -534,7 +534,9 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(struct obj_cgroup *ob >> > static inline bool folio_memcg_kmem(struct folio *folio) >> > { >> > VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(PageTail(&folio->page), &folio->page); >> > - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS, folio); >> > + VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO((folio->memcg_data != OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL) && >> > + (folio->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS), >> > + folio); >> > return folio->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_KMEM; >> > } >> > >> > -- >> > 2.25.1 >