From: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, "MASON, CHRISTOPHER" <CHRIS.MASON@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:07:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bzyd48cc14d.fsf@fransum.emea.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4D26C5.9070606@redhat.com> (Eric Sandeen's message of "Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:29:41 -0500")
Eric Sandeen writes:
> Talking w/ someone who had a raid6 of 15 drives on an areca
> controller, he wondered why he could only get 300MB/s or so
> out of a streaming buffered write to xfs like so:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/storage/10gbfile bs=128k count=81920
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 34.294 s, 313 MB/s
> when the same write directly to the device was going closer
> to 700MB/s...
> With the following change things get moving again for xfs:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/storage/10gbfile bs=128k count=81920
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 16.2938 s, 659 MB/s
> Chris had sent out something similar at Christoph's suggestion,
> and Christoph reminded me of it, and I tested it a variant of
> it, and it seems to help shockingly well.
> Feels like a bandaid though; thoughts? Other tests to do?
If the nr_to_write calculation really yields a value that is too
small, shouldn't it be fixed elsewhere?
Otherwise it might make sense to make the fudge factor tunable.
> +
> + /*
> + * VM calculation for nr_to_write seems off. Bump it way
> + * up, this gets simple streaming writes zippy again.
> + */
> + wbc->nr_to_write *= 4;
> +
--
Olaf Weber SGI Phone: +31(0)30-6696752
Veldzigt 2b Fax: +31(0)30-6696799
Technical Lead 3454 PW de Meern Vnet: 955-7151
Storage Software The Netherlands Email: olaf@sgi.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-02 21:29 Eric Sandeen
2009-07-07 9:07 ` Olaf Weber [this message]
2009-07-07 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-07 10:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-09 2:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09 13:01 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-10 7:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-24 5:20 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-07-24 5:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-24 12:05 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-07 11:37 ` Olaf Weber
2009-07-07 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-07 15:17 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bzyd48cc14d.fsf@fransum.emea.sgi.com \
--to=olaf@sgi.com \
--cc=CHRIS.MASON@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox