From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF03C433FE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 318876B0071; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2A1488E0003; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:06 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0F5E88E0002; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:06 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F4C6B0071 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14AE120A14 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:56:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80157900690.19.65B0CDE Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C50F100006 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:56:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669046164; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UcoB0SHBMmAMNILsinmifDG+uE5/E3dTA/EtqAdK4lc=; b=CGRls86jprscFw0gq9ehbEmr4yDVe539p9PoCItnRQXoMEyB66BMGwnUdCWzEtOXIAYDOE JVo4JpmAMnwGmrzwzU1mAs4IYuVY/WhBfWtBdiOFEtGIqShkcagN+m6/t/BZfUVzkmCKIg DyE6OO6E6ti2aWixkOMkmu6RupGOAPw= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-128-VgUInmlSN02nBrHjvHChDA-1; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:56:00 -0500 X-MC-Unique: VgUInmlSN02nBrHjvHChDA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id h2-20020adfa4c2000000b00241cf936619so1241172wrb.9 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 07:55:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:organization:from:references:cc:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Brr1q29tF36QPcdWuuy4BDao5Edh5KDPJSgJgZKXZRA=; b=Sgc8Yl+i+fiviNjOGmWPFVqLsQ1UAeCrYFE2xGUNDMx0X5du70XImwggoJieDbxQDc jIAADHrHr4MX5QjQj9TPrEXo2gBVKv+66iGGiRHN7bTzDECIuMKvtMSKrCht8gdmzLgt 5lqBKM1/nlsQBWXC+PjYDsbkERqAft0Y3YoVPkTsfu+PMIClt3hMHFGOjv+5ov0dY9GU gIa+L5yLhw3ISdgs8ErPJlYEATfnJmVoCSSVzL1W3JVITw3HVXBTJByn3j3NNkXyUZkb lhsxe8m9Y7SxuZcO7iKmo0Re1s7RUyePZ0zHOrMCzuLLuJcsuHfQNznXPs7+0m7D4h62 kBDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkIntSRAqcBzCllzHaBrKWeowXbCeMCsGlhpwZ94JSb5yXV+hqW F4SgvwKO7YJwtfoa+I7yie4lLep60BgDIfuEwaR/7PPBIufQxFk2tNb5bJG6tmw57Big2ctZA4V wrDLeOYQR8Uo= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f48f:0:b0:236:715c:aaa6 with SMTP id l15-20020adff48f000000b00236715caaa6mr5020257wro.25.1669046158764; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 07:55:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5Y8r12BiCMimD8lA0MdgHcMmvrdEVyQpzLWwry7IXgLsmfJELV/YezpWTosx6Pwu2JeAx35g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f48f:0:b0:236:715c:aaa6 with SMTP id l15-20020adff48f000000b00236715caaa6mr5020212wro.25.1669046158309; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 07:55:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c702:dc00:2571:c3c2:c6ea:84ef? (p200300cbc702dc002571c3c2c6ea84ef.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c702:dc00:2571:c3c2:c6ea:84ef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7-20020a05600c354700b003cf4eac8e80sm18773096wmq.23.2022.11.21.07.55.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 07:55:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:55:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Implement IOCTL to get and/or the clear info about PTEs To: Muhammad Usama Anjum , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , Andrei Vagin , Danylo Mocherniuk , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Paul Gofman Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan , Greg KH , Christian Brauner , Peter Xu , Yang Shi , Vlastimil Babka , Zach O'Keefe , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Dan Williams , kernel@collabora.com, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , Peter Enderborg , "open list : KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Shuah Khan , open list , "open list : PROC FILESYSTEM" , "open list : MEMORY MANAGEMENT" References: <20221109102303.851281-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> <9c167d01-ef09-ec4e-b4a1-2fff62bf01fe@redhat.com> <6fdce544-8d4f-8b3c-9208-735769a9e624@collabora.com> <254130e7-7fb1-6cf1-e8fa-5bc2d4450431@collabora.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <254130e7-7fb1-6cf1-e8fa-5bc2d4450431@collabora.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------X26NNqKh6qmB3gIBG6DEU1Rl" Content-Language: en-US ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1669046165; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YIZ67yDnJWA5HawfqCILnWjYM6Ee6lgOcwcwsoEvgI6vtM4Tjy8gadqjgPZm6bGOMujuob KfTWvaC9tKGPRjv7D3navvs9VN7C7veIGlJMVRQV55J/44CLRtg9Tf6eoOAsD2Kl4FabYF +4VCsqSiym5HWbK0dKPimN42j88HYVg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=CGRls86j; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1669046165; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=UcoB0SHBMmAMNILsinmifDG+uE5/E3dTA/EtqAdK4lc=; b=IsksJII9tKM+IW/EJ5nhmnlAye+bZIKPNX3E+hALw8oSlIxHV88bw09uwEeBH2xD8d8y66 EJDHew/i7RpHYQSv2pgnC5URIns7LnMQ2Si/91l2MDWfY80utsxYoSiXkZkWVg8caGoLFi mG/B5nO8QBeNK00mmbTemJMbogPVJAQ= X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: b55kwkhmfxfny965pqf7rugu75ojizmi X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0C50F100006 Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=CGRls86j; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-HE-Tag: 1669046164-802407 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------X26NNqKh6qmB3gIBG6DEU1Rl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 21.11.22 16:00, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for replying. > > On 11/14/22 8:46 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> The soft-dirtiness is stored in the PTE. VMA is marked dirty to store the >>> dirtiness for reused regions. Clearing the soft-dirty status of whole >>> process is straight forward. When we want to clear/monitor the >>> soft-dirtiness of a part of the virtual memory, there is a lot of internal >>> noise. We don't want the non-dirty pages to become dirty because of how the >>> soft-dirty feature has been working. Soft-dirty feature wasn't being used >>> the way we want to use now. While monitoring a part of memory, it is not >>> acceptable to get non-dirty pages as dirty. Non-dirty pages become dirty >>> when the two VMAs are merged without considering if they both are dirty or >>> not (34228d473efe). To monitor changes over the memory, sometimes VMAs are >>> split to clear the soft-dirty bit in the VMA flags. But sometimes kernel >>> decide to merge them backup. It is so waste of resources. >> >> Maybe you'd want a per-process option to not merge if the VM_SOFTDIRTY >> property differs. But that might be just one alternative for handling this >> case. >> >>> >>> To keep things consistent, the default behavior of the IOCTL is to output >>> even the extra non-dirty pages as dirty from the kernel noise. A optional >>> PAGEMAP_NO_REUSED_REGIONS flag is added for those use cases which aren't >>> tolerant of extra non-dirty pages. This flag can be considered as something >>> which is by-passing the already present buggy implementation in the kernel. >>> It is not buggy per say as the issue can be solved if we don't allow the >>> two VMA which have different soft-dirty bits to get merged. But we are >>> allowing that so that the total number of VMAs doesn't increase. This was >>> acceptable at the time, but now with the use case of monitoring a part of >>> memory for soft-dirty doesn't want this merging. So either we need to >>> revert 34228d473efe and PAGEMAP_NO_REUSED_REGIONS flag will not be needed >>> or we should allow PAGEMAP_NO_REUSED_REGIONS or similar mechanism to ignore >>> the extra dirty pages which aren't dirty in reality. >>> >>> When PAGEMAP_NO_REUSED_REGIONS flag is used, only the PTEs are checked to >>> find if the pages are dirty. So re-used regions cannot be detected. This >>> has the only side-effect of not checking the VMAs. So this is limitation of >>> using this flag which should be acceptable in the current state of code. >>> This limitation is okay for the users as they can clear the soft-dirty bit >>> of the VMA before starting to monitor a range of memory for soft-dirtiness. >>> >>> >>>> Please separate that part out from the other changes; I am still not >>>> convinced that we want this and what the semantical implications are. >>>> >>>> Let's take a look at an example: can_change_pte_writable() >>>> >>>>      /* Do we need write faults for softdirty tracking? */ >>>>      if (vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma) && !pte_soft_dirty(pte)) >>>>          return false; >>>> >>>> We care about PTE softdirty tracking, if it is enabled for the VMA. >>>> Tracking is enabled if: vma_soft_dirty_enabled() >>>> >>>>      /* >>>>       * Soft-dirty is kind of special: its tracking is enabled when >>>>       * the vma flags not set. >>>>       */ >>>>      return !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY); >>>> >>>> Consequently, if VM_SOFTDIRTY is set, we are not considering the soft_dirty >>>> PTE bits accordingly. >>> Sorry, I'm unable to completely grasp the meaning of the example. We have >>> followed clear_refs_write() to write the soft-dirty bit clearing code in >>> the current patch. Dirtiness of the VMA and the PTE may be set >>> independently. Newer allocated memory has dirty bit set in the VMA. When >>> something is written the memory, the soft dirty bit is set in the PTEs as >>> well regardless if the soft dirty bit is set in the VMA or not. >>> >> >> Let me try to find a simple explanation: >> >> After clearing a SOFTDIRTY PTE flag inside an area with VM_SOFTDIRTY set, >> there are ways that PTE could get written to and it could become dirty, >> without the PTE becoming softdirty. >> >> Essentially, inside a VMA with VM_SOFTDIRTY set, the PTE softdirty values >> might be stale: there might be entries that are softdirty even though the >> PTE is *not* marked softdirty. > Can someone please share the example to reproduce this? In all of my > testing, even if I ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY and only base my decision of > soft-dirtiness on individual pages, it always passes. Quick reproducer (the first and easiest one that triggered :) ) attached. With no kernel changes, it works as expected. # ./softdirty_mprotect With the following kernel change to simulate what you propose it fails: diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c index d22687d2e81e..f2c682bf7f64 100644 --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c @@ -1457,8 +1457,8 @@ static pagemap_entry_t pte_to_pagemap_entry(struct pagemapread *pm, flags |= PM_FILE; if (page && !migration && page_mapcount(page) == 1) flags |= PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE; - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY) - flags |= PM_SOFT_DIRTY; + //if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY) + // flags |= PM_SOFT_DIRTY; return make_pme(frame, flags); } # ./softdirty_mprotect Page #1 should be softdirty -- Thanks, David / dhildenb --------------X26NNqKh6qmB3gIBG6DEU1Rl Content-Type: text/x-csrc; charset=UTF-8; name="softdirty_mprotect.c" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="softdirty_mprotect.c" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 I2luY2x1ZGUgPHN0ZGxpYi5oPgojaW5jbHVkZSA8c3RyaW5nLmg+CiNpbmNsdWRlIDxzdGRpby5o PgojaW5jbHVkZSA8ZmNudGwuaD4KI2luY2x1ZGUgPHVuaXN0ZC5oPgojaW5jbHVkZSA8c3RkaW50 Lmg+CiNpbmNsdWRlIDxzdGRib29sLmg+CiNpbmNsdWRlIDxzeXMvbW1hbi5oPgoKc3RhdGljIHNp emVfdCBwYWdlc2l6ZTsKc3RhdGljIGludCBwYWdlbWFwX2ZkOwoKc3RhdGljIHZvaWQgY2xlYXJf c29mdGRpcnR5KHZvaWQpCnsKCWludCBmZCA9IG9wZW4oIi9wcm9jL3NlbGYvY2xlYXJfcmVmcyIs IE9fV1JPTkxZKTsKCWNvbnN0IGNoYXIgKmN0cmwgPSAiNCI7CglpbnQgcmV0OwoKCWlmIChmZCA8 IDApIHsKCQlmcHJpbnRmKHN0ZGVyciwgIm9wZW4oKSBmYWlsZWRcbiIpOwoJCWV4aXQoMSk7Cgl9 CglyZXQgPSB3cml0ZShmZCwgY3RybCwgc3RybGVuKGN0cmwpKTsKCWNsb3NlKGZkKTsKCWlmIChy ZXQgIT0gc3RybGVuKGN0cmwpKSB7CgkJZnByaW50ZihzdGRlcnIsICJ3cml0ZSgpIGZhaWxlZFxu Iik7CgkJZXhpdCgxKTsKCX0KfQoKc3RhdGljIHVpbnQ2NF90IHBhZ2VtYXBfZ2V0X2VudHJ5KGlu dCBmZCwgY2hhciAqc3RhcnQpCnsKCWNvbnN0IHVuc2lnbmVkIGxvbmcgcGZuID0gKHVuc2lnbmVk IGxvbmcpc3RhcnQgLyBwYWdlc2l6ZTsKCXVpbnQ2NF90IGVudHJ5OwoJaW50IHJldDsKCglyZXQg PSBwcmVhZChmZCwgJmVudHJ5LCBzaXplb2YoZW50cnkpLCBwZm4gKiBzaXplb2YoZW50cnkpKTsK CWlmIChyZXQgIT0gc2l6ZW9mKGVudHJ5KSkgewoJCWZwcmludGYoc3RkZXJyLCAicHJlYWQoKSBm YWlsZWRcbiIpOwoJCWV4aXQoMSk7Cgl9CgoJcmV0dXJuIGVudHJ5Owp9CgpzdGF0aWMgYm9vbCBw YWdlbWFwX2lzX3NvZnRkaXJ0eShpbnQgZmQsIGNoYXIgKnN0YXJ0KQp7Cgl1aW50NjRfdCBlbnRy eSA9IHBhZ2VtYXBfZ2V0X2VudHJ5KGZkLCBzdGFydCk7CgoJcmV0dXJuIGVudHJ5ICYgMHgwMDgw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwdWxsOwp9Cgp2b2lkIG1haW4odm9pZCkKewoJY2hhciAqbWVtLCAqbWVtMjsK CglwYWdlc2l6ZSA9IGdldHBhZ2VzaXplKCk7CglwYWdlbWFwX2ZkID0gb3BlbigiL3Byb2Mvc2Vs Zi9wYWdlbWFwIiwgT19SRE9OTFkpOwoJaWYgKHBhZ2VtYXBfZmQgPCAwKSB7CgkJZnByaW50Zihz dGRlcnIsICJvcGVuKCkgZmFpbGVkXG4iKTsKCQlleGl0KDEpOwoJfQoKCS8qIE1hcCAyIHBhZ2Vz LiAqLwoJbWVtID0gbW1hcCgwLCAyICogcGFnZXNpemUsIFBST1RfUkVBRHxQUk9UX1dSSVRFLAoJ CSAgIE1BUF9QUklWQVRFfE1BUF9BTk9OLCAtMSwgMCk7CglpZiAobWVtID09IE1BUF9GQUlMRUQp IHsKCQlmcHJpbnRmKHN0ZGVyciwgIm1tYXAoKSBmYWlsZWRcbiIpOwoJCWV4aXQoMSk7Cgl9CgoJ LyogUG9wdWxhdGUgYm90aCBwYWdlcy4gKi8KCW1lbXNldChtZW0sIDEsIDIgKiBwYWdlc2l6ZSk7 CgoJaWYgKCFwYWdlbWFwX2lzX3NvZnRkaXJ0eShwYWdlbWFwX2ZkLCBtZW0pKQoJCWZwcmludGYo c3RkZXJyLCAiUGFnZSAjMSBzaG91bGQgYmUgc29mdGRpcnR5XG4iKTsKCWlmICghcGFnZW1hcF9p c19zb2Z0ZGlydHkocGFnZW1hcF9mZCwgbWVtICsgcGFnZXNpemUpKQoJCWZwcmludGYoc3RkZXJy LCAiUGFnZSAjMiBzaG91bGQgYmUgc29mdGRpcnR5XG4iKTsKCgkvKgoJICogU3RhcnQgc29mdGRp cnR5IHRyYWNraW5nLiBDbGVhciBWTV9TT0ZURElSVFkgYW5kIGNsZWFyIHRoZSBzb2Z0ZGlydHkK CSAqIFBURSBiaXQuCgkgKi8KCWNsZWFyX3NvZnRkaXJ0eSgpOwoKCWlmIChwYWdlbWFwX2lzX3Nv ZnRkaXJ0eShwYWdlbWFwX2ZkLCBtZW0pKQoJCWZwcmludGYoc3RkZXJyLCAiUGFnZSAjMSBzaG91 bGQgbm90IGJlIHNvZnRkaXJ0eVxuIik7CglpZiAocGFnZW1hcF9pc19zb2Z0ZGlydHkocGFnZW1h cF9mZCwgbWVtICsgcGFnZXNpemUpKQoJCWZwcmludGYoc3RkZXJyLCAiUGFnZSAjMiBzaG91bGQg bm90IGJlIHNvZnRkaXJ0eVxuIik7CgoJLyoKCSAqIFJlbWFwIHRoZSBzZWNvbmQgcGFnZS4gVGhl IFZNQSBnZXRzIFZNX1NPRlRESVJUWSBzZXQuIEJvdGggVk1BcwoJICogZ2V0IG1lcmdlZCBzdWNo IHRoYXQgdGhlIHJlc3VsdGluZyBWTUEgaGFzIFZNX1NPRlRESVJUWSBzZXQuCgkgKi8KCW1lbTIg PSBtbWFwKG1lbSArIHBhZ2VzaXplLCBwYWdlc2l6ZSwgUFJPVF9SRUFEfFBST1RfV1JJVEUsCgkJ ICAgIE1BUF9QUklWQVRFfE1BUF9BTk9OfE1BUF9GSVhFRCwgLTEsIDApOwoJaWYgKG1lbTIgPT0g TUFQX0ZBSUxFRCkgewoJCWZwcmludGYoc3RkZXJyLCAibW1hcCgpIGZhaWxlZFxuIik7CgkJZXhp dCgxKTsKCX0KCgkvKiBQcm90ZWN0ICsgdW5wcm90ZWN0LiAqLwoJbXByb3RlY3QobWVtLCAyICog cGFnZXNpemUsIFBST1RfUkVBRCk7CgltcHJvdGVjdChtZW0sIDIgKiBwYWdlc2l6ZSwgUFJPVF9S RUFEfFBST1RfV1JJVEUpOwoKCS8qIE1vZGlmeSBib3RoIHBhZ2VzLiAqLwoJbWVtc2V0KG1lbSwg MiwgMiAqIHBhZ2VzaXplKTsKCglpZiAoIXBhZ2VtYXBfaXNfc29mdGRpcnR5KHBhZ2VtYXBfZmQs IG1lbSkpCgkJZnByaW50ZihzdGRlcnIsICJQYWdlICMxIHNob3VsZCBiZSBzb2Z0ZGlydHlcbiIp OwoJaWYgKCFwYWdlbWFwX2lzX3NvZnRkaXJ0eShwYWdlbWFwX2ZkLCBtZW0gKyBwYWdlc2l6ZSkp CgkJZnByaW50ZihzdGRlcnIsICJQYWdlICMyIHNob3VsZCBiZSBzb2Z0ZGlydHlcbiIpOwp9Cg== --------------X26NNqKh6qmB3gIBG6DEU1Rl--