* [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd)
@ 2023-07-27 5:10 Julia Lawall
2023-07-27 8:34 ` Biju Das
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2023-07-27 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Biju Das; +Cc: Linux Memory Management List, Stephen Boyd, oe-kbuild-all
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:50:37 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Subject: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8:
WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division,
please consider using div64_ul instead.
BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
TO: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: 0ba5d07205771c50789fd9063950aa75e7f1183f
commit: 6e9aff555db7b6816076121ac3feebc3006de9ad [2742/4710] clk: Add support for versa3 clock driver
:::::: branch date: 19 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 7 days ago
config: sparc64-randconfig-r061-20230726 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230727/202307270841.yr5HxYIl-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230727/202307270841.yr5HxYIl-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307270841.yr5HxYIl-lkp@intel.com/
cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead.
vim +404 drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 382
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 383 static long vc3_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 384 unsigned long *parent_rate)
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 385 {
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 386 struct vc3_hw_data *vc3 = container_of(hw, struct vc3_hw_data, hw);
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 387 const struct vc3_pll_data *pll = vc3->data;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 388 u64 div_frc;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 389
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 390 if (rate < pll->vco_min)
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 391 rate = pll->vco_min;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 392 if (rate > pll->vco_max)
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 393 rate = pll->vco_max;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 394
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 395 vc3->div_int = rate / *parent_rate;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 396
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 397 if (pll->num == VC3_PLL2) {
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 398 if (vc3->div_int > 0x7ff)
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 399 rate = *parent_rate * 0x7ff;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 400
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 401 /* Determine best fractional part, which is 16 bit wide */
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 402 div_frc = rate % *parent_rate;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 403 div_frc *= BIT(16) - 1;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 @404 do_div(div_frc, *parent_rate);
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 405
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 406 vc3->div_frc = (u32)div_frc;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 407 rate = (*parent_rate *
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 408 (vc3->div_int * VC3_2_POW_16 + div_frc) / VC3_2_POW_16);
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 409 } else {
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 410 rate = *parent_rate * vc3->div_int;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 411 }
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 412
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 413 return rate;
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 414 }
6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 415
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* RE: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) 2023-07-27 5:10 [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) Julia Lawall @ 2023-07-27 8:34 ` Biju Das 2023-07-27 8:43 ` Julia Lawall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Biju Das @ 2023-07-27 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: Linux Memory Management List, Stephen Boyd, oe-kbuild-all Hi, The reproduce link is not working for me. https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230727/202307270841.yr5HxYIl-lkp@intel.com/reproduce Can you please provide instruction to reproduce this issue? Cheers, Biju > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:50:37 +0800 > From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev > Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > Subject: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk- > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: > WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > please consider using div64_ul instead. > > BCC: lkp@intel.com > CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev > CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org> > TO: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > tree: > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > | Closes: %2BsY49B78%3D&reserved=0 > > cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64- > by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. > > vim +404 drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 382 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 383 static long > vc3_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 384 unsigned > long *parent_rate) > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 385 { > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 386 struct vc3_hw_data *vc3 = > container_of(hw, struct vc3_hw_data, hw); > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 387 const struct vc3_pll_data *pll > = vc3->data; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 388 u64 div_frc; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 389 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 390 if (rate < pll->vco_min) > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 391 rate = pll->vco_min; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 392 if (rate > pll->vco_max) > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 393 rate = pll->vco_max; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 394 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 395 vc3->div_int = rate / > *parent_rate; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 396 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 397 if (pll->num == VC3_PLL2) { > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 398 if (vc3->div_int > 0x7ff) > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 399 rate = *parent_rate > * 0x7ff; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 400 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 401 /* Determine best > fractional part, which is 16 bit wide */ > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 402 div_frc = rate % > *parent_rate; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 403 div_frc *= BIT(16) - 1; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 @404 do_div(div_frc, > *parent_rate); > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 405 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 406 vc3->div_frc = > (u32)div_frc; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 407 rate = (*parent_rate * > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 408 (vc3->div_int * > VC3_2_POW_16 + div_frc) / VC3_2_POW_16); > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 409 } else { > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 410 rate = *parent_rate * > vc3->div_int; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 411 } > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 412 > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 413 return rate; > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 414 } > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 415 > > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) 2023-07-27 8:34 ` Biju Das @ 2023-07-27 8:43 ` Julia Lawall 2023-07-27 9:19 ` Biju Das 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Julia Lawall @ 2023-07-27 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Biju Das; +Cc: Linux Memory Management List, Stephen Boyd, oe-kbuild-all On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, Biju Das wrote: > Hi, > > The reproduce link is not working for me. > > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230727/202307270841.yr5HxYIl-lkp@intel.com/reproduce > > Can you please provide instruction to reproduce this issue? I don't think it's intended to be reproduced. The issue is just that a long value is being passed to an integer that is 32 bit. If the long value will never be very big, then you can just ignore the warning. julia > > Cheers, > Biju > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:50:37 +0800 > > From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev > > Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > Subject: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk- > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: > > WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > BCC: lkp@intel.com > > CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev > > CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org> > > TO: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > > CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > > > tree: > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > > version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > | Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > | Closes: > %2BsY49B78%3D&reserved=0 > > > > cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > > >> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64- > > by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > vim +404 drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 382 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 383 static long > > vc3_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 384 unsigned > > long *parent_rate) > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 385 { > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 386 struct vc3_hw_data *vc3 = > > container_of(hw, struct vc3_hw_data, hw); > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 387 const struct vc3_pll_data *pll > > = vc3->data; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 388 u64 div_frc; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 389 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 390 if (rate < pll->vco_min) > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 391 rate = pll->vco_min; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 392 if (rate > pll->vco_max) > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 393 rate = pll->vco_max; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 394 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 395 vc3->div_int = rate / > > *parent_rate; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 396 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 397 if (pll->num == VC3_PLL2) { > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 398 if (vc3->div_int > 0x7ff) > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 399 rate = *parent_rate > > * 0x7ff; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 400 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 401 /* Determine best > > fractional part, which is 16 bit wide */ > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 402 div_frc = rate % > > *parent_rate; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 403 div_frc *= BIT(16) - 1; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 @404 do_div(div_frc, > > *parent_rate); > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 405 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 406 vc3->div_frc = > > (u32)div_frc; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 407 rate = (*parent_rate * > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 408 (vc3->div_int * > > VC3_2_POW_16 + div_frc) / VC3_2_POW_16); > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 409 } else { > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 410 rate = *parent_rate * > > vc3->div_int; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 411 } > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 412 > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 413 return rate; > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 414 } > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 415 > > > > -- > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) 2023-07-27 8:43 ` Julia Lawall @ 2023-07-27 9:19 ` Biju Das 2023-07-27 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Biju Das @ 2023-07-27 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Julia Lawall Cc: Linux Memory Management List, Stephen Boyd, oe-kbuild-all, Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-renesas-soc Hi Julia, > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please > consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, Biju Das wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The reproduce link is not working for me. > > > > > > Can you please provide instruction to reproduce this issue? > > I don't think it's intended to be reproduced. The issue is just that a > long value is being passed to an integer that is 32 bit. If the long > value will never be very big, then you can just ignore the warning. The rate values are well below max 32 bit, 4294967296. So I guess, it is ok. xtal 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y ref 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y pfd1 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y pll1 0 0 0 600000000 0 0 50000 Y div2 0 0 0 12000000 0 0 50000 Y se3_mux 0 0 0 12000000 0 0 50000 Y se3 0 0 0 12000000 0 0 50000 Y div1_mux 0 0 0 600000000 0 0 50000 Y div1 0 0 0 25000000 0 0 50000 Y diff1_mux 0 0 0 25000000 0 0 50000 Y diff1 0 0 0 25000000 0 0 50000 Y pfd3_mux 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y pfd3 0 0 0 960000 0 0 50000 Y pll3 0 0 0 564480000 0 0 50000 Y div5 0 0 0 11289600 0 0 50000 Y se1_mux 0 0 0 11289600 0 0 50000 Y se1 0 0 0 11289600 0 0 50000 Y se2_mux 0 0 0 11289600 0 0 50000 Y se2 0 0 0 11289600 0 0 50000 Y pfd2_mux 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y pfd2 0 0 0 24000000 0 0 50000 Y pll2 0 0 0 491519897 0 0 50000 Y div4_mux 0 0 0 491519897 0 0 50000 Y div4 0 0 0 12287998 0 0 50000 Y div3_mux 0 0 0 491519897 0 0 50000 Y div3 0 0 0 12287998 0 0 50000 Y diff2_mux 0 0 0 12287998 0 0 50000 Y diff2 0 0 0 12287998 0 0 50000 Y Cheers, Biju > > > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > > please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:50:37 +0800 > > > From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev > > > Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > > Subject: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk- > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: > > > WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > > please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > > > BCC: lkp@intel.com > > > CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev > > > CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org> > > > TO: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > > > CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > > > > > tree: > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > > > version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > | Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > > | Closes: > > %2BsY49B78%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > > > >> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a > > > >> 64- > > > by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > > > vim +404 drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c > > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 382 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 383 static long > > > vc3_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 384 > unsigned > > > long *parent_rate) > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 385 { > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 386 struct vc3_hw_data *vc3 = > > > container_of(hw, struct vc3_hw_data, hw); > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 387 const struct vc3_pll_data > *pll > > > = vc3->data; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 388 u64 div_frc; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 389 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 390 if (rate < pll->vco_min) > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 391 rate = pll->vco_min; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 392 if (rate > pll->vco_max) > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 393 rate = pll->vco_max; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 394 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 395 vc3->div_int = rate / > > > *parent_rate; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 396 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 397 if (pll->num == VC3_PLL2) > { > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 398 if (vc3->div_int > > 0x7ff) > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 399 rate = > *parent_rate > > > * 0x7ff; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 400 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 401 /* Determine best > > > fractional part, which is 16 bit wide */ > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 402 div_frc = rate % > > > *parent_rate; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 403 div_frc *= BIT(16) - > 1; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 @404 do_div(div_frc, > > > *parent_rate); > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 405 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 406 vc3->div_frc = > > > (u32)div_frc; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 407 rate = (*parent_rate > * > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 408 (vc3->div_int > * > > > VC3_2_POW_16 + div_frc) / VC3_2_POW_16); > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 409 } else { > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 410 rate = *parent_rate > * > > > vc3->div_int; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 411 } > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 412 > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 413 return rate; > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 414 } > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 415 > > > > > > -- > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) 2023-07-27 9:19 ` Biju Das @ 2023-07-27 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2023-07-27 10:01 ` Biju Das 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2023-07-27 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Biju Das Cc: Julia Lawall, Linux Memory Management List, Stephen Boyd, oe-kbuild-all, Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-renesas-soc Hi Biju, On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:19 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please > > consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, Biju Das wrote: > > > The reproduce link is not working for me. > > > > > > Can you please provide instruction to reproduce this issue? > > > > I don't think it's intended to be reproduced. The issue is just that a > > long value is being passed to an integer that is 32 bit. If the long > > value will never be very big, then you can just ignore the warning. > > The rate values are well below max 32 bit, 4294967296. So I guess, it is ok. The type of the parent_rate in/output parameter of clk_ops.round_rate() is unsigned long. Hence you should use div64_ul(). > > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > > > please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:50:37 +0800 > > > > From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev > > > > Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > > > Subject: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk- > > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: > > > > WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > > > please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > > > > > BCC: lkp@intel.com > > > > CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev > > > > CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org> > > > > TO: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > > > > CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > > > > > > > tree: > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > > > > version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > | Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > > > | Closes: > > > %2BsY49B78%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > > > > >> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a > > > > >> 64- > > > > by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > > > > > vim +404 drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c > > > > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 382 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 383 static long > > > > vc3_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 384 > > unsigned > > > > long *parent_rate) > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 385 { > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 386 struct vc3_hw_data *vc3 = > > > > container_of(hw, struct vc3_hw_data, hw); > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 387 const struct vc3_pll_data > > *pll > > > > = vc3->data; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 388 u64 div_frc; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 389 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 390 if (rate < pll->vco_min) > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 391 rate = pll->vco_min; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 392 if (rate > pll->vco_max) > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 393 rate = pll->vco_max; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 394 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 395 vc3->div_int = rate / > > > > *parent_rate; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 396 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 397 if (pll->num == VC3_PLL2) > > { > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 398 if (vc3->div_int > > > 0x7ff) > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 399 rate = > > *parent_rate > > > > * 0x7ff; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 400 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 401 /* Determine best > > > > fractional part, which is 16 bit wide */ > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 402 div_frc = rate % > > > > *parent_rate; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 403 div_frc *= BIT(16) - > > 1; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 @404 do_div(div_frc, > > > > *parent_rate); > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 405 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 406 vc3->div_frc = > > > > (u32)div_frc; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 407 rate = (*parent_rate > > * > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 408 (vc3->div_int > > * > > > > VC3_2_POW_16 + div_frc) / VC3_2_POW_16); > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 409 } else { > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 410 rate = *parent_rate > > * > > > > vc3->div_int; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 411 } > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 412 > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 413 return rate; > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 414 } > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 415 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > > > -- Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) 2023-07-27 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2023-07-27 10:01 ` Biju Das 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Biju Das @ 2023-07-27 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Julia Lawall, Linux Memory Management List, Stephen Boyd, oe-kbuild-all, Geert Uytterhoeven, linux-renesas-soc Hi Geert, Thanks for the feedback. > Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk- > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please > consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > Hi Biju, > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:19 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > wrote: > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > > please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, Biju Das wrote: > > > > The reproduce link is not working for me. > > > > > > > > Can you please provide instruction to reproduce this issue? > > > > > > I don't think it's intended to be reproduced. The issue is just > > > that a long value is being passed to an integer that is 32 bit. If > > > the long value will never be very big, then you can just ignore the > warning. > > > > The rate values are well below max 32 bit, 4294967296. So I guess, it is > ok. > > The type of the parent_rate in/output parameter of clk_ops.round_rate() is > unsigned long. Hence you should use div64_ul(). Agreed. Will send a patch to fix this issue. Cheers, Biju > > > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 > > > > > division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:50:37 +0800 > > > > > From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > > To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev > > > > > Cc: lkp@intel.com, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > > > > Subject: [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk- > > > > > versaclock3.c:404:2-8: > > > > > WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, > > > > > please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > > > > > > > BCC: lkp@intel.com > > > > > CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev > > > > > CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org> > > > > > TO: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> > > > > > > > > > > tree: > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a > > > > > new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > > | Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > > > > > | Closes: > > > > %2BsY49B78%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > > > > > >> drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does > > > > > >> a > > > > > >> 64- > > > > > by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. > > > > > > > > > > vim +404 drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c > > > > > > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 382 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 383 static long > > > > > vc3_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 384 > > > unsigned > > > > > long *parent_rate) > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 385 { > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 386 struct vc3_hw_data *vc3 > = > > > > > container_of(hw, struct vc3_hw_data, hw); > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 387 const struct > vc3_pll_data > > > *pll > > > > > = vc3->data; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 388 u64 div_frc; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 389 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 390 if (rate < pll->vco_min) > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 391 rate = pll- > >vco_min; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 392 if (rate > pll->vco_max) > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 393 rate = pll- > >vco_max; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 394 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 395 vc3->div_int = rate / > > > > > *parent_rate; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 396 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 397 if (pll->num == > VC3_PLL2) > > > { > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 398 if (vc3->div_int > > > > > 0x7ff) > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 399 rate = > > > *parent_rate > > > > > * 0x7ff; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 400 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 401 /* Determine > best > > > > > fractional part, which is 16 bit wide */ > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 402 div_frc = rate % > > > > > *parent_rate; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 403 div_frc *= > BIT(16) - > > > 1; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 @404 do_div(div_frc, > > > > > *parent_rate); > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 405 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 406 vc3->div_frc = > > > > > (u32)div_frc; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 407 rate = > (*parent_rate > > > * > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 408 (vc3- > >div_int > > > * > > > > > VC3_2_POW_16 + div_frc) / VC3_2_POW_16); > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 409 } else { > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 410 rate = > *parent_rate > > > * > > > > > vc3->div_int; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 411 } > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 412 > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 413 return rate; > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 414 } > > > > > 6e9aff555db7b6 Biju Das 2023-07-05 415 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > > > > > > > > -- > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux- > m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. > But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something > like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-27 10:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-07-27 5:10 [linux-next:master 2742/4710] drivers/clk/clk-versaclock3.c:404:2-8: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead. (fwd) Julia Lawall 2023-07-27 8:34 ` Biju Das 2023-07-27 8:43 ` Julia Lawall 2023-07-27 9:19 ` Biju Das 2023-07-27 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2023-07-27 10:01 ` Biju Das
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox