From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 16:28:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf01158f-c110-4dc5-9a52-1c2db64518a0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f23e8df8-5836-4ffb-83ef-d19c7c04947f@redhat.com>
On 5/16/25 2:48 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.05.25 10:19, Donet Tom wrote:
>> register_one_node() is now only called via cpu_up() →
>> __try_online_node()
>> during CPU hotplug operations to online a node. At this stage, the
>> node has
>> not yet had any memory added. As a result, there are no memory blocks to
>> walk or register, so calling register_memory_blocks_under_node() is
>> unnecessary. Therefore, the call to register_memory_blocks_under_node()
>> has been removed from register_one_node().
>
> It might help to throw in some empty lines to make this easier to read.
>
> Patch subject should start with something like
>
> "node:" or "mm:"
Sorry. I missed it. I will add it in the next version.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v3->v4
>>
>> Addressed Mike's comment by dropping the call to
>> register_memory_blocks_under_node() from register_one_node()
>>
>> v3 -
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/b49ed289096643ff5b5fbedcf1d1c1be42845a74.1746250339.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
>> v2 -
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe1e0c7d91bf3fa9a64ff5d84b53ded1d0d5ac7.1745852397.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
>> v1 -
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/50142a29010463f436dc5c4feb540e5de3bb09df.1744175097.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com/
>> ---
>> include/linux/node.h | 6 ------
>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
>> index 806e62638cbe..8b8f96ca5b06 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/node.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
>> @@ -137,15 +137,9 @@ static inline int register_one_node(int nid)
>> int error = 0;
>> if (node_online(nid)) {
>> - struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>> - unsigned long start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
>> - unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
>> -
>> error = __register_one_node(nid);
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>> - register_memory_blocks_under_node(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn,
>> - MEMINIT_EARLY);
>> }
>
> Can be further simplified
>
> if (node_online(nid))
> error = __register_one_node(nid);
> return error;
Thanks. I will add it and it in the next version.
>
>> return error;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 8:19 [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time Donet Tom
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] driver/base: remove register_mem_block_under_node_early() Donet Tom
2025-05-16 10:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node Donet Tom
2025-05-16 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:58 ` Donet Tom [this message]
2025-05-16 10:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:06 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 8:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drivers/base : Rename register_memory_blocks_under_node() and remove context argument Donet Tom
2025-05-16 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-20 10:07 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-05-16 9:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] driver/base: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 10:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-16 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-16 11:00 ` Donet Tom
2025-05-16 11:00 ` Donet Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf01158f-c110-4dc5-9a52-1c2db64518a0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox