From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2863AC00140 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9B4168E0001; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:50:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 964508D0002; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:50:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 8041E8E0001; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:50:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E00A8D0002 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:50:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EA7AC93B for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:50:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79814208432.29.C92C0B1 Received: by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id 31C261465B4; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7D2141071 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0279863.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27IAWwak023044; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:01:16 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=qcppdkim1; bh=1g/BkFyX8It6eFh6KePQfu0ZOeCiGrJHX0cQQC2SOyk=; b=TTsBMXiw56AD9S0aHodHRMIzGde785Ie46GovzTCoDf9DsSzq2WZBFSdCcuieyo8WqNY rNlDkeEPwg4PjwAYJrivfxLW+Lrk1WRAlR6wwUScLSsnTyBMjWs5i1elm/MKBBZZUtzt MMt0n7FpJY59Z4xIjfJt9RUicaWRJMRoowXlfWSJqgUupx+6kDws2J4ss60o6jth+bvX 111v6gpYh9oS6ge73Kh2j10cERRTBrjWP0PQFoY5o3KgyTUgMl0T0Gn4QXc8KeS4Itjc h0hcD65VD1e8jAQyAGICYDSIXp44RuUfWK04FJy4uLu29l7zlvWE7FrEnv2czO26vdsz RA== Received: from nalasppmta01.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j1hhp1b4f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:01:15 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (NALASPPMTA01.qualcomm.com [127.0.0.1]) by NALASPPMTA01.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27IE1FYK021171; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:01:15 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by NALASPPMTA01.qualcomm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hywar3xk3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:01:15 +0000 Received: from NALASPPMTA01.qualcomm.com (NALASPPMTA01.qualcomm.com [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27IE1EfS021164; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:01:14 GMT Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA01.qualcomm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 27IE1EYP021162 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:01:14 +0000 Received: from [10.214.20.211] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 07:01:10 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:31:05 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm: fix use-after free of page_ext after race with memory-offline Content-Language: en-US To: Michal Hocko CC: , , , , , , , , , , References: <1660056403-20894-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com> <286e47e7-3d63-133c-aa6c-05100b557d42@quicinc.com> From: Charan Teja Kalla In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: xZS7wHPDsPq84jrGmyNyKiHEySmNd5Xy X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xZS7wHPDsPq84jrGmyNyKiHEySmNd5Xy X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-18_12,2022-08-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=262 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208180050 ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1660837422; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vTXB0CZZbDmq9I94u4BHZ3exrO+MEUjqKpQRs5XR7IpC68BN5BsTuLBkkMi1iCwESwAyf4 cjCfKe5sw9C+PIOlGV22WlzgZBcpm3Ae2TQiBv/IG6daONTHW1VZTD1n80VudRWz7eK6rm QS0u8pXngCArFiOIQNKSxCPlqtWYY5o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=quicinc.com header.s=qcppdkim1 header.b=TTsBMXiw; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of quic_charante@quicinc.com designates 205.220.168.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=quic_charante@quicinc.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=quicinc.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1660837422; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=1g/BkFyX8It6eFh6KePQfu0ZOeCiGrJHX0cQQC2SOyk=; b=riT6T86kA+jJ8PuesZr9invYYVm8C7H0jtyOv3vp/wSfDdrJm7w9eXOLDuKiok9F1pu4As BjfJU/jQMjt08mA6b+1tC+CuaTFsskGUck4ipShTushvbSuKBhg5QS0lIgC2vDsCjlwdIK pnJCm4OKQ7UNYxV4VQatii67aXwJIGw= X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF7D2141071 Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=quicinc.com header.s=qcppdkim1 header.b=TTsBMXiw; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of quic_charante@quicinc.com designates 205.220.168.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=quic_charante@quicinc.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=quicinc.com X-Stat-Signature: yxzm847ncpjcb998whx5myx4k8uwfzbs X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1660837419-153557 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Michal, On 8/16/2022 9:45 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>>> @@ -183,19 +184,26 @@ static inline void __set_page_owner_handle(struct page_ext *page_ext, >>>> noinline void __set_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order, >>>> gfp_t gfp_mask) >>>> { >>>> - struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page); >>>> + struct page_ext *page_ext = page_ext_get(page); >>>> depot_stack_handle_t handle; >>>> >>>> if (unlikely(!page_ext)) >>>> return; >>> Either add a comment like this >>> /* save_stack can sleep in general so we have to page_ext_put */ >> >> Vlastimil suggested to go for save stack first since !page_ext is mostly >> unlikely. Snip from his comments: >> Why not simply do the save_stack() first and then page_ext_get() just >> once? It should be really rare that it's NULL, so I don't think we save >> much by avoiding an unnecessary save_stack(), while the overhead of >> doing two get/put instead of one will affect every call. > right see below >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f5fd4942-b03e-1d1c-213b-9cd5283ced91@suse.cz/ >>>> + page_ext_put(); >>>> >>>> handle = save_stack(gfp_mask); >>> or just drop the initial page_ext_get altogether. This function is >>> called only when page_ext is supposed to be initialized and !page_ext >>> case above should be very unlikely. Or is there any reason to keep this? I don't think that !page_ext check is really required as __set_page_owner() is called means page_ext should have been initialized. Will raise a separate change for this suggestion. For now V4 is raised with the earlier suggestion of dropping the initial page_ext. https://lore.kernel.org/all/1660830600-9068-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com/. Thanks, Charan