From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Donet Tom <donettom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sachin P Bappalige <sachinpb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/4] cma: powerpc fadump fixes
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:25:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be2a1166-9c8e-489f-8e95-b905a06fc9e5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zfnb54fe.fsf@mail.lhotse>
On 11.10.24 12:17, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com> writes:
>> Please find the v2 of cma related powerpc fadump fixes.
>>
>> Patch-1 is a change in mm/cma.c to make sure we return an error if someone uses
>> cma_init_reserved_mem() before the pageblock_order is initalized.
>>
>> I guess, it's best if Patch-1 goes via mm tree and since rest of the changes
>> are powerpc fadump fixes hence those should go via powerpc tree. Right?
>
> Yes I think that will work.
>
> Because there's no actual dependency on patch 1, correct?
>
> Let's see if the mm folks are happy with the approach, and if so you
> should send patch 1 on its own, and patches 2-4 as a separate series.
Makes sense to me.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 7:23 Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-11 7:23 ` [RFC v2 1/4] cma: Enforce non-zero pageblock_order during cma_init_reserved_mem() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-11 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-11 7:23 ` [RFC v2 2/4] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-11 7:23 ` [RFC v2 3/4] fadump: Reserve page-aligned boot_memory_size during fadump_reserve_mem Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-11 10:51 ` Hari Bathini
2024-10-11 7:23 ` [RFC v2 4/4] fadump: Move fadump_cma_init to setup_arch() after initmem_init() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-10-11 10:17 ` [RFC v2 0/4] cma: powerpc fadump fixes Michael Ellerman
2024-10-11 10:25 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-10-11 11:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be2a1166-9c8e-489f-8e95-b905a06fc9e5@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=donettom@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sachinpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox