linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	syzbot <syzbot+702361cf7e3d95758761@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in generic_fillattr / shmem_mknod (2)
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 14:15:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdb1fe2d-f904-78f0-d287-5e601f789862@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+a=xWkNGw_iKibRp4ivSE8OJkWWT0VPQ4N4d1+vj0FMdg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2023/04/24 17:26, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> HEAD commit:    457391b03803 Linux 6.3
>> git tree:       upstream
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13226cf0280000
>> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8c81c9a3d360ebcf
>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=702361cf7e3d95758761
>> compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.7, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> 
> I think shmem_mknod() needs to use i_size_write() to update the size.
> Writes to i_size are not assumed to be atomic throughout the kernel
> code.
> 

I don't think that using i_size_{read,write}() alone is sufficient,
for I think that i_size_{read,write}() needs data_race() annotation.

 include/linux/fs.h |   13 +++++++++++--
 mm/shmem.c         |   12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 21a981680856..0d067bbe3ee9 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -860,6 +860,13 @@ void filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(struct address_space *mapping1,
  * the read or for example on x86 they can be still implemented as a
  * cmpxchg8b without the need of the lock prefix). For SMP compiles
  * and 64bit archs it makes no difference if preempt is enabled or not.
+ *
+ * However, when KCSAN is enabled, CPU being capable of reading/updating
+ * naturally aligned 8 bytes of memory atomically is not sufficient for
+ * avoiding KCSAN warning, for KCSAN checks whether value has changed between
+ * before and after of a read operation. But since we don't want to introduce
+ * seqcount overhead only for suppressing KCSAN warning, tell KCSAN that data
+ * race on accessing i_size field is acceptable.
  */
 static inline loff_t i_size_read(const struct inode *inode)
 {
@@ -880,7 +887,8 @@ static inline loff_t i_size_read(const struct inode *inode)
 	preempt_enable();
 	return i_size;
 #else
-	return inode->i_size;
+	/* See comment above. */
+	return data_race(inode->i_size);
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -902,7 +910,8 @@ static inline void i_size_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t i_size)
 	inode->i_size = i_size;
 	preempt_enable();
 #else
-	inode->i_size = i_size;
+	/* See comment above. */
+	data_race(inode->i_size = i_size);
 #endif
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index e40a08c5c6d7..a2f20297fb59 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ shmem_mknod(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
 			goto out_iput;
 
 		error = 0;
-		dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
+		i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
 		dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(dir);
 		inode_inc_iversion(dir);
 		d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
@@ -3027,7 +3027,7 @@ static int shmem_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, struct dentr
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
+	i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
 	inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
 	inode_inc_iversion(dir);
 	inc_nlink(inode);
@@ -3045,7 +3045,7 @@ static int shmem_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 	if (inode->i_nlink > 1 && !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
 		shmem_free_inode(inode->i_sb);
 
-	dir->i_size -= BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
+	i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) - BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
 	inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
 	inode_inc_iversion(dir);
 	drop_nlink(inode);
@@ -3132,8 +3132,8 @@ static int shmem_rename2(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
 		inc_nlink(new_dir);
 	}
 
-	old_dir->i_size -= BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
-	new_dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
+	i_size_write(old_dir, i_size_read(old_dir) - BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
+	i_size_write(new_dir, i_size_read(new_dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
 	old_dir->i_ctime = old_dir->i_mtime =
 	new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime =
 	inode->i_ctime = current_time(old_dir);
@@ -3189,7 +3189,7 @@ static int shmem_symlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
 		folio_unlock(folio);
 		folio_put(folio);
 	}
-	dir->i_size += BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE;
+	i_size_write(dir, i_size_read(dir) + BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE);
 	dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = current_time(dir);
 	inode_inc_iversion(dir);
 	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);

Maybe we want i_size_add() ?

Also, there was a similar report on updating i_{ctime,mtime} to current_time()
which means that i_size is not the only field that is causing data race.
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=067d40ab9ab23a6fa0a8156857ed54e295062a29

Hmm, where is the serialization that avoids concurrent
shmem_mknod()/shmem_mknod() or shmem_mknod()/shmem_unlink() ?
i_size_write() says "need locking around it (normally i_mutex)"...



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-01  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24  7:58 syzbot
     [not found] ` <CACT4Y+a=xWkNGw_iKibRp4ivSE8OJkWWT0VPQ4N4d1+vj0FMdg@mail.gmail.com>
2023-05-01  5:15   ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2023-05-01 14:05     ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-05-02 10:13       ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-05-02  6:13     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-01-12 12:15 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bdb1fe2d-f904-78f0-d287-5e601f789862@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=syzbot+702361cf7e3d95758761@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox