linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's ->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone"
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:00:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd83ef7c-9465-4700-96cd-fc16e6b3ceb4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226032258.234099-1-krisman@suse.de>



On 2/26/25 4:22 AM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Commit 96a5c186efff ("mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's
> ->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone") removes the protection of lower
> zones from allocations targeting memory-less high zones.  This had an
> unintended impact on the pattern of reclaims because it makes the
> high-zone-targeted allocation more likely to succeed in lower zones,
> which adds pressure to said zones.  I.e, the following corresponding
> checks in zone_watermark_ok/zone_watermark_fast are less likely to
> trigger:
> 
>         if (free_pages <= min + z->lowmem_reserve[highest_zoneidx])
>                 return false;
> 
> As a result, we are observing an increase in reclaim and kswapd scans,
> due to the increased pressure.  This was initially observed as increased
> latency in filesystem operations when benchmarking with fio on a machine
> with some memory-less zones, but it has since been associated with
> increased contention in locks related to memory reclaim.  By reverting
> this patch, the original performance was recovered on that machine.
> 
> The original commit was introduced as a clarification of the
> /proc/zoneinfo output, so it doesn't seem there are usecases depending
> on it, making the revert a simple solution.
> 
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 96a5c186efff ("mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's ->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 579789600a3c..fe986e6de7a0 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5849,11 +5849,10 @@ static void setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve(void)
>  
>  			for (j = i + 1; j < MAX_NR_ZONES; j++) {
>  				struct zone *upper_zone = &pgdat->node_zones[j];
> -				bool empty = !zone_managed_pages(upper_zone);
>  
>  				managed_pages += zone_managed_pages(upper_zone);
>  
> -				if (clear || empty)
> +				if (clear)
>  					zone->lowmem_reserve[j] = 0;
>  				else
>  					zone->lowmem_reserve[j] = managed_pages / ratio;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-26 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26  3:22 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-02-26  6:54 ` Michal Hocko
2025-02-26 10:00   ` Baoquan He
2025-02-26 10:52     ` Michal Hocko
2025-02-26 11:00       ` Michal Hocko
2025-02-26 11:51         ` Baoquan He
2025-02-26 12:01           ` Michal Hocko
2025-02-26 15:57             ` Baoquan He
2025-02-26 17:46               ` Michal Hocko
2025-02-27  9:41                 ` Baoquan He
2025-02-27  9:16               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-27 10:24                 ` Baoquan He
2025-02-27 13:16                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-27 15:53                     ` Baoquan He
2025-02-26 13:07   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-26 16:05   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-02-26 23:00     ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-26 13:00 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-02-27 11:50 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd83ef7c-9465-4700-96cd-fc16e6b3ceb4@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox