From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f200.google.com (mail-wr0-f200.google.com [209.85.128.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82796B0009 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:40:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr0-f200.google.com with SMTP id h14so1818668wre.19 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com. [194.213.3.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 49si7614455wrz.390.2018.02.20.08.40.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:40:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Pmalloc: self-test References: <20180212165301.17933-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20180212165301.17933-6-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> From: Igor Stoppa Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:40:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Kees Cook Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet , Michal Hocko , Laura Abbott , Jerome Glisse , Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Lameter , linux-security-module , Linux-MM , LKML , Kernel Hardening On 13/02/18 01:43, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote: [...] >> +obj-$(CONFIG_PROTECTABLE_MEMORY_SELFTEST) += pmalloc-selftest.o > > Nit: self-test modules are traditionally named "test_$thing.o" > (outside of the tools/ directory). ok [...] > I wonder if lkdtm should grow a test too, to validate the RO-ness of > the allocations at the right time in API usage? sorry for being dense ... are you proposing that I do something to lkdtm_rodata.c ? An example would probably help me understand. -- igor -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org