From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] memcg, slab: cleanup barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:16:54 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd0a7ffc57e4a0b0c3d456c0cf8801e829e14717.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f02b2d079ffd0990ae335339c803337b13ecd8c.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
First, in memcg_create_kmem_cache() we should issue the write barrier
after the kmem_cache is initialized, but before storing the pointer to
it in its parent's memcg_params.
Second, we should always issue the read barrier after
cache_from_memcg_idx() to conform with the write barrier.
Third, its better to use smp_* versions of barriers, because we don't
need them on UP systems.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
mm/slab.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e6ad6ff..e37fdb5 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3429,12 +3429,14 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
atomic_set(&new_cachep->memcg_params->nr_pages , 0);
- cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] = new_cachep;
/*
- * the readers won't lock, make sure everybody sees the updated value,
- * so they won't put stuff in the queue again for no reason
+ * Since readers won't lock (see cache_from_memcg_idx()), we need a
+ * barrier here to ensure nobody will see the kmem_cache partially
+ * initialized.
*/
- wmb();
+ smp_wmb();
+
+ cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] = new_cachep;
out:
mutex_unlock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
return new_cachep;
@@ -3573,7 +3575,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
gfp_t gfp)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- int idx;
+ struct kmem_cache *memcg_cachep;
VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params);
VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params->is_root_cache);
@@ -3587,15 +3589,9 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
if (!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
goto out;
- idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
-
- /*
- * barrier to mare sure we're always seeing the up to date value. The
- * code updating memcg_caches will issue a write barrier to match this.
- */
- read_barrier_depends();
- if (likely(cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx))) {
- cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx);
+ memcg_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_id(memcg));
+ if (likely(memcg_cachep)) {
+ cachep = memcg_cachep;
goto out;
}
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 0859c42..1d8b53f 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -163,9 +163,13 @@ static inline const char *cache_name(struct kmem_cache *s)
static inline struct kmem_cache *
cache_from_memcg_idx(struct kmem_cache *s, int idx)
{
+ struct kmem_cache *cachep;
+
if (!s->memcg_params)
return NULL;
- return s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
+ cachep = s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
+ smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* see memcg_register_cache() */
+ return cachep;
}
static inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_root_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 13:16 [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] memcg, slab: kmem_cache_create_memcg(): free memcg params on error Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:32 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:01 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 13:16 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2013-12-18 17:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] memcg, slab: cleanup barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:37 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:10 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:16 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:29 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:53 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] memcg, slab: check and init memcg_cahes under slab_mutex Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:41 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 7:07 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:00 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-19 9:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:17 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:21 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] memcg: clear memcg_params after removing cache from memcg_slab_caches list Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] memcg, slab: RCU protect memcg_params for root caches Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:47 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 10:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:31 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 8:51 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 7:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-19 8:17 ` [Devel] " Vasily Averin
2013-12-19 8:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:26 ` Vasily Averin
2013-12-19 9:42 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 10:23 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd0a7ffc57e4a0b0c3d456c0cf8801e829e14717.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox