linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] memcg, slab: cleanup barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:16:54 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd0a7ffc57e4a0b0c3d456c0cf8801e829e14717.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f02b2d079ffd0990ae335339c803337b13ecd8c.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>

First, in memcg_create_kmem_cache() we should issue the write barrier
after the kmem_cache is initialized, but before storing the pointer to
it in its parent's memcg_params.

Second, we should always issue the read barrier after
cache_from_memcg_idx() to conform with the write barrier.

Third, its better to use smp_* versions of barriers, because we don't
need them on UP systems.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   24 ++++++++++--------------
 mm/slab.h       |    6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e6ad6ff..e37fdb5 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3429,12 +3429,14 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
 	atomic_set(&new_cachep->memcg_params->nr_pages , 0);
 
-	cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] = new_cachep;
 	/*
-	 * the readers won't lock, make sure everybody sees the updated value,
-	 * so they won't put stuff in the queue again for no reason
+	 * Since readers won't lock (see cache_from_memcg_idx()), we need a
+	 * barrier here to ensure nobody will see the kmem_cache partially
+	 * initialized.
 	 */
-	wmb();
+	smp_wmb();
+
+	cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] = new_cachep;
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
 	return new_cachep;
@@ -3573,7 +3575,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 					  gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-	int idx;
+	struct kmem_cache *memcg_cachep;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params);
 	VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params->is_root_cache);
@@ -3587,15 +3589,9 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 	if (!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
 		goto out;
 
-	idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
-
-	/*
-	 * barrier to mare sure we're always seeing the up to date value.  The
-	 * code updating memcg_caches will issue a write barrier to match this.
-	 */
-	read_barrier_depends();
-	if (likely(cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx))) {
-		cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx);
+	memcg_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_id(memcg));
+	if (likely(memcg_cachep)) {
+		cachep = memcg_cachep;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 0859c42..1d8b53f 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -163,9 +163,13 @@ static inline const char *cache_name(struct kmem_cache *s)
 static inline struct kmem_cache *
 cache_from_memcg_idx(struct kmem_cache *s, int idx)
 {
+	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
+
 	if (!s->memcg_params)
 		return NULL;
-	return s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
+	cachep = s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
+	smp_read_barrier_depends();	/* see memcg_register_cache() */
+	return cachep;
 }
 
 static inline struct kmem_cache *memcg_root_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-18 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-18 13:16 [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] memcg, slab: kmem_cache_create_memcg(): free memcg params on error Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:06   ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  6:32     ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  8:48       ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:01         ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:19           ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 13:16 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2013-12-18 17:14   ` [PATCH 3/6] memcg, slab: cleanup barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  6:37     ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:10       ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:16         ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:21           ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:29             ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:36               ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:53                 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] memcg, slab: check and init memcg_cahes under slab_mutex Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:41   ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  7:07     ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  8:00       ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-19  9:12         ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:17           ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:21         ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] memcg: clear memcg_params after removing cache from memcg_slab_caches list Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] memcg, slab: RCU protect memcg_params for root caches Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:28   ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:36     ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:43       ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  9:47         ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 10:06           ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  6:31   ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  8:44     ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  8:51       ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:16         ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19  7:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-19  8:17 ` [Devel] " Vasily Averin
2013-12-19  8:39   ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:26     ` Vasily Averin
2013-12-19  9:42       ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19  9:45       ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 10:23       ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd0a7ffc57e4a0b0c3d456c0cf8801e829e14717.1387372122.git.vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox