From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>,
nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Cc: lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, william.roche@oracle.com,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, willy@infradead.org,
jane.chu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
osalvador@suse.de, muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/memory-failure: avoid free HWPoison high-order folio
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:15:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcfd5575-cff0-4ead-9136-dd509bf11f64@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116014721.1561456-3-jiaqiyan@google.com>
On 16.11.25 02:47, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> At the end of dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio, when a free HugeTLB
> folio becomes non-HugeTLB, it is released to buddy allocator
> as a high-order folio, e.g. a folio that contains 262144 pages
> if the folio was a 1G HugeTLB hugepage.
>
> This is problematic if the HugeTLB hugepage contained HWPoison
> subpages. In that case, since buddy allocator does not check
> HWPoison for non-zero-order folio, the raw HWPoison page can
> be given out with its buddy page and be re-used by either
> kernel or userspace.
>
> Memory failure recovery (MFR) in kernel does attempt to take
> raw HWPoison page off buddy allocator after
> dissolve_free_hugetlb_folio. However, there is always a time
> window between freed to buddy allocator and taken off from
> buddy allocator.
>
> One obvious way to avoid this problem is to add page sanity
> checks in page allocate or free path. However, it is against
> the past efforts to reduce sanity check overhead [1,2,3].
>
> Introduce hugetlb_free_hwpoison_folio to solve this problem.
> The idea is, in case a HugeTLB folio for sure contains HWPoison
> page(s), first split the non-HugeTLB high-order folio uniformly
> into 0-order folios, then let healthy pages join the buddy
> allocator while reject the HWPoison ones.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1460711275-1130-15-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1460711275-1130-16-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230216095131.17336-1-vbabka@suse.cz
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
[...]
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 3edebb0cda30b..e6a9deba6292a 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2002,6 +2002,49 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void hugetlb_free_hwpoison_folio(struct folio *folio)
What is hugetlb specific in here? :)
Hint: if there is nothing, likely it should be generic infrastructure.
But I would prefer if the page allocator could just take care of that
when freeing a folio.
--
Cheers
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 1:47 [PATCH v1 0/2] Only free healthy pages in high-order HWPoison folio Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-16 1:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/huge_memory: introduce uniform_split_unmapped_folio_to_zero_order Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-16 11:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-17 3:15 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-17 3:21 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-17 3:39 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-17 13:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-18 6:24 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-18 10:19 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-18 19:26 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-18 21:54 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-19 12:37 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-19 19:21 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-19 20:35 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-16 22:38 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-17 17:12 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-16 1:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/memory-failure: avoid free HWPoison high-order folio Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-16 2:10 ` Zi Yan
2025-11-18 5:12 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-11-17 17:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-11-18 5:17 ` Jiaqi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bcfd5575-cff0-4ead-9136-dd509bf11f64@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox