From: Zaslonko Mikhail <zaslonko@linux.bm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:45:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcf681ea-7944-0a16-fbd4-c79ab176e638@linux.bm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181210132451.GO1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Hello,
On 10.12.2018 14:24, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 10-12-18 14:07:12, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
>> If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the
>> mapping of such a section is only partly initialized.
>
> It would be great to mention how you can end up in the situation like
> this(a user provided memmap or a strange HW).
Yes, I should probably keep full failure samples from my previous patch
version.
>
>> This may lead to
>> VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct page access from
>> is_mem_section_removable() or test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by
>> memory_hotplug sysfs handlers:
>>
>> page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned
>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
>> Call Trace:
>> ([<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160)
>> [<00000000008f15c4>] show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190
>> [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
>> [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
>> [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480
>> [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178
>> [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138
>> [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
>> [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
>> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>> [<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>
>> Fix the problem by initializing the last memory section of the highest zone
>> in memmap_init_zone() till the very end, even if it goes beyond the zone
>> end.
>
> Why do we need to restrict this to the highest zone? In other words, why
> cannot we do what I was suggesting earlier [1]. What does prevent other
> zones to have an incomplete section boundary?
Well, as you were also suggesting earlier: 'If we do not have a zone which
spans the rest of the section'. I'm not sure how else we should verify that.
Moreover, I was able to recreate the problem only with the highest zone
(memory end is not on the section boundary).
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105183533.GQ4361@dhcp22.suse.cz
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> ---
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 2ec9cc407216..41ef5508e5f1 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -5542,6 +5542,21 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>> cond_resched();
>> }
>> }
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
>> + /*
>> + * If there is no zone spanning the rest of the section
>> + * then we should at least initialize those pages. Otherwise we
>> + * could blow up on a poisoned page in some paths which depend
>> + * on full sections being initialized (e.g. memory hotplug).
>> + */
>> + if (end_pfn == max_pfn) {
>> + while (end_pfn % PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>> + __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(end_pfn), end_pfn, zone,
>> + nid);
>> + end_pfn++;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE
>> --
>> 2.16.4
>
Thanks,
Mikhail Zaslonko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-10 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-10 13:07 [PATCH 0/1] Initialize struct pages for the full section Mikhail Zaslonko
2018-12-10 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section Mikhail Zaslonko
2018-12-10 13:24 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-10 15:45 ` Zaslonko Mikhail [this message]
2018-12-10 18:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-11 15:18 ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11 9:49 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-11 15:17 ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11 22:24 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-10 15:10 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-10 16:14 ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11 1:50 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-11 15:23 ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11 22:14 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-10 21:09 ` Sasha Levin
2019-06-14 21:56 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bcf681ea-7944-0a16-fbd4-c79ab176e638@linux.bm.com \
--to=zaslonko@linux.bm.com \
--cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox