From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: Hangs in balance_dirty_pages with arm-32 LPAE + highmem
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:10:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba9181f3-505d-c4ed-5f8b-d57696432f21@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180314090851.GG4811@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 03/14/2018 02:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 05-03-18 13:04:24, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 02/26/2018 06:28 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Fri 23-02-18 11:51:41, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The Fedora arm-32 build VMs have a somewhat long standing problem
>>>> of hanging when running mkfs.ext4 with a bunch of processes stuck
>>>> in D state. This has been seen as far back as 4.13 but is still
>>>> present on 4.14:
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> This looks like everything is blocked on the writeback completing but
>>>> the writeback has been throttled. According to the infra team, this problem
>>>> is _not_ seen without LPAE (i.e. only 4G of RAM). I did see
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10201593/ but that doesn't seem to
>>>> quite match since this seems to be completely stuck. Any suggestions to
>>>> narrow the problem down?
>>>
>>> How much dirtyable memory does the system have? We do allow only lowmem
>>> to be dirtyable by default on 32b highmem systems. Maybe you have the
>>> lowmem mostly consumed by the kernel memory. Have you tried to enable
>>> highmem_is_dirtyable?
>>>
>>
>> Setting highmem_is_dirtyable did fix the problem. The infrastructure
>> people seemed satisfied enough with this (and are happy to have the
>> machines back). I'll see if they are willing to run a few more tests
>> to get some more state information.
>
> Please be aware that highmem_is_dirtyable is not for free. There are
> some code paths which can only allocate from lowmem (e.g. block device
> AFAIR) and those could fill up the whole lowmem without any throttling.
>
Good to note. This particular setup is one basically everyone dislikes
so I think this is only encouragement to move to something else.
Thanks,
Laura
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 19:51 Laura Abbott
2018-02-26 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-05 21:04 ` Laura Abbott
2018-03-06 11:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-14 9:12 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-14 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-15 20:10 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba9181f3-505d-c4ed-5f8b-d57696432f21@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox