linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com,
	shy828301@gmail.com, guro@fb.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, raquini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/vmscan.c: Prevent allocating shrinker_info on offlined nodes
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:45:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba4d3fd5-b64e-ce61-379e-27ae84a89cfd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24b4455c-aff9-ca9f-e29f-350833e7a0d1@virtuozzo.com>



On 12/6/21 08:19, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 06.12.2021 13:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> This doesn't seen complete. Slab shrinkers are used in the reclaim
>>> context. Previously offline nodes could be onlined later and this would
>>> lead to NULL ptr because there is no hook to allocate new shrinker
>>> infos. This would be also really impractical because this would have to
>>> update all existing memcgs...
>>
>> Instead of going through the trouble of updating...
>>
>> ...  maybe just keep for_each_node() and check if the target node is
>> offline. If it's offline, just allocate from the first online node.
>> After all, we're not using __GFP_THISNODE, so there are no guarantees
>> either way ...
> 
> Hm, can't we add shrinker maps allocation to __try_online_node() in addition
> to this patch? 
> 
Thanks for the feedback :) I am currently working a solution similar to this.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-07 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-06  3:33 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: Dont allocate pages on a offline node Nico Pache
2021-12-06  3:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] include/linux/gfp.h: Do not allocate pages on a offlined node Nico Pache
2021-12-06  3:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-06  9:22   ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-07 21:24     ` Nico Pache
2021-12-06  3:33 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/vmscan.c: Prevent allocating shrinker_info on offlined nodes Nico Pache
2021-12-06  9:22   ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-06  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-07 21:34     ` Nico Pache
     [not found]     ` <d9d14beb-ee20-7ebb-e007-fbf58fb28535@redhat.com>
2021-12-06 10:54       ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]         ` <840cb3d0-61fe-b6cb-9918-69146ba06cf7@redhat.com>
2021-12-06 11:22           ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]             ` <51c65635-1dae-6ba4-daf9-db9df0ec35d8@redhat.com>
2021-12-06 13:06               ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                 ` <05157de4-e5df-11fc-fc46-8a9f79d0ddb4@redhat.com>
2021-12-06 14:06                   ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                     ` <d4f281e6-1999-a3de-b879-c6ca6a25ae67@redhat.com>
2021-12-06 14:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-06 14:30                         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-12-06 14:53                           ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-06 18:26                             ` Yang Shi
2021-12-07 10:15                               ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-06 14:15                   ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]       ` <24b4455c-aff9-ca9f-e29f-350833e7a0d1@virtuozzo.com>
2021-12-06 13:24         ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-08 19:00           ` Nico Pache
2021-12-06 18:42         ` Yang Shi
     [not found]           ` <a48c16d6-07df-ff44-67e6-f0942672ec28@redhat.com>
2021-12-06 21:28             ` Yang Shi
2021-12-07 10:15               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-07 10:55             ` Michal Hocko
2021-12-07 21:45         ` Nico Pache [this message]
2021-12-07 21:40       ` Nico Pache
2021-12-06 18:45   ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba4d3fd5-b64e-ce61-379e-27ae84a89cfd@redhat.com \
    --to=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=raquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox