From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mhocko@suse.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, jack@suse.cz,
jglisse@redhat.com, jrdr.linux@gmail.com, bhe@redhat.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
richard.weiyang@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com, mingo@kernel.org,
osalvador@techadventures.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/sparse: add sparse_init_nid()
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:59:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba037a25-eef0-c2b1-91f2-5db5588b2881@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180702020417.21281-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> @@ -2651,6 +2651,14 @@ void sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> unsigned long pnum_end,
> unsigned long map_count,
> int nodeid);
> +struct page * sparse_populate_node(unsigned long pnum_begin,
CodingStyle: put the "*" next to the function name, no space, please.
> + unsigned long pnum_end,
> + unsigned long map_count,
> + int nid);
> +struct page * sparse_populate_node_section(struct page *map_base,
> + unsigned long map_index,
> + unsigned long pnum,
> + int nid);
These two functions are named in very similar ways. Do they do similar
things?
> struct page *sparse_mem_map_populate(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> struct vmem_altmap *altmap);
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index e1a54ba411ec..b3e325962306 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -311,3 +311,52 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
> }
> }
> +
> +struct page * __init sparse_populate_node(unsigned long pnum_begin,
> + unsigned long pnum_end,
> + unsigned long map_count,
> + int nid)
> +{
Could you comment what the function is doing, please?
> + unsigned long size = sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> + unsigned long pnum, map_index = 0;
> + void *vmemmap_buf_start;
> +
> + size = ALIGN(size, PMD_SIZE) * map_count;
> + vmemmap_buf_start = __earlyonly_bootmem_alloc(nid, size,
> + PMD_SIZE,
> + __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
Let's not repeat the mistakes of the previous version of the code.
Please explain why we are aligning this. Also,
__earlyonly_bootmem_alloc()->memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw() claims to
be aligning the size. Do we also need to do it here?
Yes, I know the old code did this, but this is the cost of doing a
rewrite. :)
> + if (vmemmap_buf_start) {
> + vmemmap_buf = vmemmap_buf_start;
> + vmemmap_buf_end = vmemmap_buf_start + size;
> + }
It would be nice to call out that these are globals that other code
picks up.
> + for (pnum = pnum_begin; map_index < map_count; pnum++) {
> + if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
> + continue;
> + if (!sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nid, NULL))
> + break;
^ This consumes "vmemmap_buf", right? That seems like a really nice
thing to point out here if so.
> + map_index++;
> + BUG_ON(pnum >= pnum_end);
> + }
> +
> + if (vmemmap_buf_start) {
> + /* need to free left buf */
> + memblock_free_early(__pa(vmemmap_buf),
> + vmemmap_buf_end - vmemmap_buf);
> + vmemmap_buf = NULL;
> + vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
> + }
> + return pfn_to_page(section_nr_to_pfn(pnum_begin));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Return map for pnum section. sparse_populate_node() has populated memory map
> + * in this node, we simply do pnum to struct page conversion.
> + */
> +struct page * __init sparse_populate_node_section(struct page *map_base,
> + unsigned long map_index,
> + unsigned long pnum,
> + int nid)
> +{
> + return pfn_to_page(section_nr_to_pfn(pnum));
> +}
What is up with all of the unused arguments to this function?
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index d18e2697a781..c18d92b8ab9b 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -456,6 +456,43 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page **map_map,
> __func__);
> }
> }
> +
> +static unsigned long section_map_size(void)
> +{
> + return PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +}
Seems like if we have this, we should use it wherever possible, like
sparse_populate_node().
> +/*
> + * Try to allocate all struct pages for this node, if this fails, we will
> + * be allocating one section at a time in sparse_populate_node_section().
> + */
> +struct page * __init sparse_populate_node(unsigned long pnum_begin,
> + unsigned long pnum_end,
> + unsigned long map_count,
> + int nid)
> +{
> + return memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw(section_map_size() * map_count,
> + PAGE_SIZE, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS),
> + BOOTMEM_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Return map for pnum section. map_base is not NULL if we could allocate map
> + * for this node together. Otherwise we allocate one section at a time.
> + * map_index is the index of pnum in this node counting only present sections.
> + */
> +struct page * __init sparse_populate_node_section(struct page *map_base,
> + unsigned long map_index,
> + unsigned long pnum,
> + int nid)
> +{
> + if (map_base) {
> + unsigned long offset = section_map_size() * map_index;
> +
> + return (struct page *)((char *)map_base + offset);
> + }
> + return sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nid, NULL);
Oh, you have a vmemmap and non-vmemmap version.
BTW, can't the whole map base calculation just be replaced with:
return &map_base[PAGES_PER_SECTION * map_index];
?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-02 2:04 [PATCH v3 0/2] sparse_init rewrite Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 2:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/sparse: add sparse_init_nid() Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 2:11 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 2:18 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 2:31 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 2:43 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 2:53 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 3:03 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 3:14 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 3:17 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 3:28 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 3:42 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 2:56 ` Baoquan He
2018-07-02 3:05 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 19:59 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-07-02 20:29 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-05 13:39 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-09 14:31 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 2:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/sparse: start using sparse_init_nid(), and remove old code Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 14:04 ` Oscar Salvador
2018-07-02 19:47 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-02 19:54 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 20:00 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-02 20:12 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-02 16:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sparse_init rewrite Dave Hansen
2018-07-02 17:46 ` Pavel Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba037a25-eef0-c2b1-91f2-5db5588b2881@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@techadventures.net \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox