Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/zbud: reuse unbuddied[0] as buddied in zbud_pool

[Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>]

On 2021/6/8 7:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 15:51:40 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> Since commit 9d8c5b5284e4 ("mm: zbud: fix condition check on allocation
>> size"), zbud_pool.unbuddied[0] is always unused. We can reuse it as buddied
>> field to save some possible memory.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/zbud.c
>> +++ b/mm/zbud.c
>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
>>  struct zbud_pool {
>>  	spinlock_t lock;
>>  	struct list_head unbuddied[NCHUNKS];
>> -	struct list_head buddied;
>> +#define buddied unbuddied[0]
>>  	struct list_head lru;
>>  	u64 pages_nr;
>>  	const struct zbud_ops *ops;
> 
> That looks a bit hacky.  Can we at least have a comment explaining
> what's going on?
> 
> Would it be better to implement this with a union, rather than a #define?

It seems union is better and comment is necessary. Will try to do this.
Many thanks for your comment and reply!

> .
>