Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: remove left over comment about follow_huge_foo()

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 25.07.24 04:16, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The comment is useless after commit 57a196a58421 ("hugetlb: simplify
> hugetlb handling in follow_page_mask") since all follow_huge_foo() are
> killed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
>   mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 0858a1827207..ba176240f764 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -7503,10 +7503,6 @@ __weak unsigned long hugetlb_mask_last_page(struct hstate *h)
>   
>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB */
>   
> -/*
> - * These functions are overwritable if your architecture needs its own
> - * behavior.
> - */
>   bool isolate_hugetlb(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
>   {
>   	bool ret = true;

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb