From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] slub: Update frozen slabs documentations in the source
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:48:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8a5cba5-e01e-4627-b775-85928edb1722@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <211ac705-5972-9b39-73f1-a608e65b6de3@suse.cz>
On 2023/11/1 21:51, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/31/23 15:07, chengming.zhou@linux.dev wrote:
>> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>>
>> The current updated scheme (which this series implemented) is:
>> - node partial slabs: PG_Workingset && !frozen
>> - cpu partial slabs: !PG_Workingset && !frozen
>> - cpu slabs: !PG_Workingset && frozen
>> - full slabs: !PG_Workingset && !frozen
>
> It could be useful to put this also to the initial comment description.
> Towards the end of the comment, there's a block explaining
> "slab->frozen". It could be extended to cover all 4 combination (but not
> all of them need such long explanation).
>
Ok, I will extend it and put in the cover letter of v5.
>>
>> The most important change is that "frozen" bit is not set for the
>> cpu partial slabs anymore, __slab_free() will grab node list_lock
>> then check by !PG_Workingset that it's not on a node partial list.
>>
>> And the "frozen" bit is still kept for the cpu slabs for performance,
>> since we don't need to grab node list_lock to check whether the
>> PG_Workingset is set or not if the "frozen" bit is set in __slab_free().
>>
>> Update related documentations and comments in the source.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> mm/slub.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index bb7368047103..89d3f7a18a73 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -76,13 +76,22 @@
>> *
>> * Frozen slabs
>> *
>> - * If a slab is frozen then it is exempt from list management. It is not
>> - * on any list except per cpu partial list. The processor that froze the
>> + * If a slab is frozen then it is exempt from list management. It is
>> + * the cpu slab which is actively allocated from by the processor that
>> + * froze it and it is not on any list. The processor that froze the
>> * slab is the one who can perform list operations on the slab. Other
>> * processors may put objects onto the freelist but the processor that
>> * froze the slab is the only one that can retrieve the objects from the
>> * slab's freelist.
>> *
>> + * CPU partial slabs
>> + *
>> + * The partially empty slabs cached on the CPU partial list are used
>> + * for performance reasons, which speeds up the allocation process.
>> + * These slabs are not frozen, but also exempt from list management,
>
> ^ are also
>
> (otherwise somebody could read it as "also are not")
>
Ah, will fix.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-31 14:07 [RFC PATCH v4 0/9] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/9] slub: Reflow ___slab_alloc() chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/9] slub: Change get_partial() interfaces to return slab chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/9] slub: Keep track of whether slub is on the per-node partial list chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 12:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/9] slub: Prepare __slab_free() for unfrozen partial slab out of node " chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 12:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/9] slub: Introduce freeze_slab() chengming.zhou
2023-12-03 6:08 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/9] slub: Delay freezing of partial slabs chengming.zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/9] slub: Optimize deactivate_slab() chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 13:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:10 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/9] slub: Rename all *unfreeze_partials* functions to *put_partials* chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 13:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:12 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-10-31 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] slub: Update frozen slabs documentations in the source chengming.zhou
2023-11-01 13:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:48 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2023-11-01 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/9] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-11-02 2:17 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-11-01 13:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-02 2:19 ` Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8a5cba5-e01e-4627-b775-85928edb1722@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox