From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
yuzhao@google.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm: page_ext: Introduce new iteration API
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:49:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b80a15a7-f9ce-49eb-b721-b59f20bd6fac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219155212.9474b8c44bd58780a54c8a6e@linux-foundation.org>
On 20.02.25 00:52, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:17:46 -0500 Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> To fix this, this series introduces a new iteration API for page extension
>> objects. The API checks if the next page extension object can be retrieved
>> from the current section or if it needs to look up for it in another
>> section.
>>
>> ...
>
> A regression since 6.12, so we should backport the fix.
>
>> ...
>>
>> include/linux/page_ext.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> mm/page_ext.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> mm/page_owner.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> mm/page_table_check.c | 39 +++++++----------------
>> 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> That's a lot to backport!
>
> Is there some quick-n-dirty fixup we can apply for the sake of -stable
> kernels, then work on this long-term approach for future kernels?
I assume we could loop in
reset_page_owner()/page_table_check_free()/set_page_owner()/page_table_check_alloc().
Not-so-nice for upstream, maybe good-enough for stable. Still nasty :)
OTOH, we don't really expect a lot of conflicts.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 2:17 Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-19 2:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: page_ext: add an iteration API for page extensions Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-20 10:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 20:36 ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-20 20:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 20:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 21:12 ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-19 2:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: page_table_check: use new iteration API Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-20 11:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 20:37 ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-19 2:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: page_owner: " Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-19 2:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: page_ext: make page_ext_next() private to page_ext Luiz Capitulino
2025-02-19 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm: page_ext: Introduce new iteration API Andrew Morton
2025-02-20 10:49 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-02-20 20:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b80a15a7-f9ce-49eb-b721-b59f20bd6fac@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox