linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftests/mm: introduce helper to read every page in range
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:37:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b785754d-ba6f-42db-9e44-66fd377aad03@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109013009.68474-1-sj@kernel.org>

On 09/01/2026 02:30, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Jan 2026 16:48:39 +0000 Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> FORCE_READ(*addr) ensures that the compiler will emit a load from
>> addr. Several tests need to trigger such a load for every page in
>> the range [addr, addr + len), ensuring that every page is faulted
>> in, if it wasn't already.
>>
>> Introduce a new helper force_read_pages_in_range() that does exactly
>> that and replace existing loops with a call to it.
> Seems like a good cleanup to me.

Thanks for having a look at this series!

>> Some of those
>> loops have a different step size, but reading from every page is
>> appropriate in all cases.
> So the test program's behavior is slightly be changed.  I believe that
> shouldn't be problem, but I'm not that familiar with the test code, so not very
> sure.  I'd like to listen voices from people more familiar with those.
>
> Meanwhile, I'm curious what do you think about making the helper function
> receives the step size together, and let the callers just pass their current
> step size.

That's what I initially considered, but considering this discussion on
v1 [1] this doesn't seem to be justified. In hugetlb-madvise, reading
every page instead of every hugepage is unnecessary but still correct
and the overhead should be negligible. In split_huge_page_test, I don't
think there's any justification for reading every byte - the intention
is to fault in pages, like all the other cases this patch touches.

- Kevin

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a3ca6293-8f85-4489-a48e-eb8d0d3792c5@kernel.org/



  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-12  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-07 16:48 [PATCH v2 0/8] Various mm kselftests improvements/fixes Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] selftests/mm: default KDIR to build directory Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] selftests/mm: remove flaky header check Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] selftests/mm: pass down full CC and CFLAGS to check_config.sh Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-07 16:59   ` Mark Brown
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] selftests/mm: fix usage of FORCE_READ() in cow tests Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-08  0:56   ` SeongJae Park
2026-01-08  2:04   ` wang lian
2026-01-08  2:07   ` [PATCH v2 7/8] selftests/mm: fix exit code in pagemap_ioctl wang lian
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] selftests/mm: introduce helper to read every page in range Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-09  1:30   ` SeongJae Park
2026-01-12  9:37     ` Kevin Brodsky [this message]
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] selftests/mm: fix faulting-in code in pagemap_ioctl test Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] selftests/mm: fix exit code in pagemap_ioctl Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-08  1:06   ` SeongJae Park
2026-01-08  2:12   ` wang lian
2026-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] selftests/mm: report SKIP in pfnmap if a check fails Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-12  9:34   ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-12 10:03     ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-12 10:25       ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b785754d-ba6f-42db-9e44-66fd377aad03@arm.com \
    --to=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox