From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] slub: Print non-hashed pointers in slub debugging
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7574917-eecd-0a83-0d55-d8fefecd3536@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210520013539.3733631-1-swboyd@chromium.org>
+CC folks from the no_hash_pointers debate
Full thread with patches here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210520013539.3733631-1-swboyd@chromium.org/
On 5/20/21 3:35 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I was doing some debugging recently and noticed that my pointers were
> being hashed while slub_debug was on the kernel commandline. Let's make
> the prints in here meaningful in that case by pushing %px throughout.
But we actually added no_hash_pointers exactly so that we don't push %px in
hexdump and others. So I don't think this will be accepted.
> Alternatively, we could force on no_hash_pointers if slub_debug is on
> the commandline. Maybe that would be better?
That would certainly be more acceptable, but maybe still too much, dunno. I'm
neutral on this approach, let's see what others think.
> The final patch is just something else I noticed while looking at the
> code. The message argument is never used so the debugging messages are
> not as clear as they could be.
>
> Stephen Boyd (3):
> lib/hexdump: Add a raw pointer printing format for slub debugging
> slub: Print raw pointer addresses when debugging
> slub: Actually use 'message' in restore_bytes()
>
> include/linux/printk.h | 1 +
> lib/hexdump.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> mm/slub.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 1:35 Stephen Boyd
2021-05-20 1:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/hexdump: Add a raw pointer printing format for " Stephen Boyd
2021-05-24 5:11 ` David Rientjes
2021-05-24 11:36 ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-20 1:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] slub: Print raw pointer addresses when debugging Stephen Boyd
2021-05-24 11:32 ` Petr Mladek
2021-05-25 6:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-05-20 1:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] slub: Actually use 'message' in restore_bytes() Stephen Boyd
2021-05-20 10:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-24 5:12 ` David Rientjes
2021-05-25 7:37 ` Joe Perches
2021-05-26 2:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-05-26 2:38 ` Joe Perches
2021-05-20 10:01 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7574917-eecd-0a83-0d55-d8fefecd3536@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox