linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	ziy@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: khugepaged: remove mm when all memory has been collapsed
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 10:00:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b717aa22-780d-4698-965b-10580142163c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <qjrahvphdjzbptb4k7lzxbp2encmejvxumuzqiu6au3n3zwr2z@a2gxh37ba3ix>

On 12/19/25 06:24, Vernon Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:29:18AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
>> On 12/15/25 10:04, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>> The following data is traced by bpftrace on a desktop system. After
>>> the system has been left idle for 10 minutes upon booting, a lot of
>>> SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or SCAN_PMD_NONE are observed during a full scan by
>>> khugepaged.
>>>
>>> @scan_pmd_status[1]: 1           ## SCAN_SUCCEED
>>> @scan_pmd_status[4]: 158         ## SCAN_PMD_MAPPED
>>> @scan_pmd_status[3]: 174         ## SCAN_PMD_NONE
>>> total progress size: 701 MB
>>> Total time         : 440 seconds ## include khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs
>>>
>>> The khugepaged_scan list save all task that support collapse into hugepage,
>>> as long as the take is not destroyed, khugepaged will not remove it from
>>> the khugepaged_scan list. This exist a phenomenon where task has already
>>> collapsed all memory regions into hugepage, but khugepaged continues to
>>> scan it, which wastes CPU time and invalid, and due to
>>> khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs (default 10s) causes a long wait for
>>> scanning a large number of invalid task, so scanning really valid task
>>> is later.
>>>
>>> After applying this patch, when all memory is either SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or
>>> SCAN_PMD_NONE, the mm is automatically removed from khugepaged's scan
>>> list. If the page fault or MADV_HUGEPAGE again, it is added back to
>>> khugepaged.
>>
>> I don't like that, as it assumes that memory within such a process would be
>> rather static, which is easily not the case (e.g., allocators just doing
>> MADV_DONTNEED to free memory).
>>
>> If most stuff is collapsed to PMDs already, can't we just skip over these
>> regions a bit faster?
> 
> /* default scan 8*HPAGE_PMD_NR ptes (or vmas) every 10 second */
> static unsigned int khugepaged_pages_to_scan __read_mostly;
> 
> The observed phenomenon is that when scanning these regions, the loop is
> broken upon reaching the number of khugepaged_pages_to_scan, thereforce
> the khugepaged enters 10s sleep.
BTW, the 10s sleep is ridiculous :)

I wonder whether we were more careful in the past regarding canning 
overhead due to the mmap read lock. Nowadays page faults typicaly use 
per-vma locks, so I wonder whether the scanning overhead is still a 
problem. (I assume there is more to optimize long-term)

-- 
Cheers

David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-15  9:04 [PATCH 0/4] Improve khugepaged scan logic Vernon Yang
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: khugepaged: add trace_mm_khugepaged_scan event Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  9:24   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:21     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: khugepaged: remove mm when all memory has been collapsed Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 11:52   ` Lance Yang
2025-12-16  6:27     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 21:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16  6:30     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 23:01   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16  6:32     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-17  3:31   ` Wei Yang
2025-12-18  3:27     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  3:48       ` Wei Yang
2025-12-18  4:41         ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  9:29   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:24     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-19  9:00       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-19  8:35     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-19  8:55       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 11:18       ` Dev Jain
2025-12-25 16:07         ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-29  6:02         ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-22 19:00   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: khugepaged: move mm to list tail when MADV_COLD/MADV_FREE Vernon Yang
2025-12-15 21:12   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16  7:00     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-16 13:08   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-16 13:31   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-18  9:31   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:29     ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-19  8:58       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21  2:10         ` Wei Yang
2025-12-21  4:25           ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-21  9:24             ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-21 12:34               ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-23  9:59                 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-25 15:12                   ` Vernon Yang
2025-12-21 12:38             ` Wei Yang
2025-12-15  9:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: khugepaged: set to next mm direct when mm has MMF_DISABLE_THP_COMPLETELY Vernon Yang
2025-12-18  9:33   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-19  5:31     ` Vernon Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b717aa22-780d-4698-965b-10580142163c@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=yanglincheng@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox