From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Large folios and filemap_get_folios_contig()
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 20:06:53 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b714e4de-2583-4035-b829-72cfb5eb6fc6@gmx.com> (raw)
Hi,
Recently I hit a bug when developing the large folios support for btrfs.
That we call filemap_get_folios_contig(), then lock each returned folio.
(We also have a case where we unlock each returned folio)
However since a large folio can be returned several times in the batch,
this obviously makes a deadlock, as btrfs is trying to lock the same
folio more than once.
Then I looked into the caller of filemap_get_folios_contig() inside
mm/gup, and it indeed does the correct skip.
This makes me wonder, since we have large folios, why we still go
filemap_get_folios_contig() and skip duplicated large folios?
Isn't the purpose of large folios to handle a much large range in just
one go, without going through multiple pages?
And there are only 3 call sites, two of them are nilfs and ramfs,
neither support large folios, the only caller with large folio support
is the memfd_pin_folios(), which skip duplicated folios manually.
I'm wondering if it's possible to make filemap_get_folios_contig() to
avoid filling the batch with duplicated folios completely?
Thanks,
Qu
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 9:36 Qu Wenruo [this message]
2025-04-03 12:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-03 21:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2025-04-04 0:50 ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-04-04 4:15 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b714e4de-2583-4035-b829-72cfb5eb6fc6@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox