From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
To: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Markus.Elfring@web.de,
Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/page_alloc: Consolidate unlikely handling in page_expected_state
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 13:58:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6cd8306-5049-4e03-ac24-7f8f5bb381e2@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z-4GuZZ_BjFNm9Gq@fedora>
在 2025/4/3 11:55, Vishal Moola (Oracle) 写道:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 10:49:17AM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
>> 在 2025/3/31 23:59, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 08:08:01PM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
>>>> 在 2025/3/28 22:29, Matthew Wilcox 写道:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 09:47:57AM +0800, Ye Liu wrote:
>>>>>> Consolidate the handling of unlikely conditions in the
>>>>>> page_expected_state() function to reduce code duplication and improve
>>>>>> readability.
>>>>> I don't think this is an equivalent transformation.
>>>> Could you explain it in detail?
>>> page_expected_state() is called both at free and alloc. I think
>>> the correct behaviour on encountering a HWPOISON page should be
>>> different at alloc and free, don't you?
>> In the alloc process, this patch does not modify the code behavior.
>> Regarding the free process, the if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page)) && !order)
>> code handles the case where order is 0. When order is not 0, it does not
>> matter if __ClearPageBuddy is used to process the last page of the compound
>> page, because page->flags &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP; will also clear it.
>> Is that right?
> I believe a page's "Buddy" flag is stored in page->type, so maybe this
> won't do what you expect?
Got it, thanks! I originally thought that page->page_type would also be
cleared in the free process, meaning the free behavior wouldn't change,
but that’s not actually the case. I need to look into what impact it
would have if __ClearPageBuddy is also executed in the free process.
Thanks,
Ye Liu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 1:47 Ye Liu
2025-03-28 9:44 ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-28 14:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-31 12:08 ` Ye Liu
2025-03-31 12:21 ` [v4] " Markus Elfring
2025-03-31 12:51 ` Ye Liu
2025-03-31 13:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-31 15:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-02 2:51 ` Ye Liu
2025-03-31 15:59 ` [PATCH v4] " Matthew Wilcox
2025-04-02 2:49 ` Ye Liu
2025-04-03 3:55 ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-04-03 5:58 ` Ye Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6cd8306-5049-4e03-ac24-7f8f5bb381e2@linux.dev \
--to=ye.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox