From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/base/node: merge register_one_node() and register_node() to a single function.
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:31:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b68642ac-ca2a-4775-8a1f-02cf7681545e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d168030f-388c-4f58-987f-648bba5b32f9@csgroup.eu>
On 9/25/25 12:45 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 24/09/2025 à 20:40, Donet Tom a écrit :
>> register_one_node() and register_node() are small functions.
>> This patch merges them into a single function named register_node()
>> to improve code readability.
>
> This is unclear.
>
> What it really does is it folds register_node() into its only caller
> which is register_one_node() and then it renames register_one_node()
> into register_node().
Yes, you are right. I will add proper explanations in the next version.
>
>>
>> No functional changes are introduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/base/node.c | 52 +++++++++-------------
>> include/linux/node.h | 4 +-
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 +-
>> mm/mm_init.c | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
>> index aeb8633a3d00..8c77ec7980de 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci_dlpar.c
>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct pci_controller *init_phb_dynamic(struct
>> device_node *dn)
>> nid = of_node_to_nid(dn);
>> if (likely((nid) >= 0)) {
>> if (!node_online(nid)) {
>> - if (register_one_node(nid)) {
>> + if (register_node(nid)) {
>> pr_err("PCI: Failed to register node %d\n", nid);
>> } else {
>> update_numa_distance(dn);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>> index c24890c40138..7a97327140df 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void __init init_gi_nodes(void)
>> * bringup_nonboot_cpus
>> * cpu_up
>> * __try_online_node
>> - * register_one_node
>> + * register_node
>> * because node_subsys is not initialized yet.
>> * TODO remove dependency on node_online
>> */
>> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
>> * bringup_nonboot_cpus
>> * cpu_up
>> * __try_online_node
>> - * register_one_node
>> + * register_node
>> * because node_subsys is not initialized yet.
>> * TODO remove dependency on node_online
>> */
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
>> index 6b6e55a98b79..eab620e29c78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
>> @@ -638,33 +638,6 @@ static void node_device_release(struct device *dev)
>> kfree(to_node(dev));
>> }
>> -/*
>> - * register_node - Setup a sysfs device for a node.
>> - * @num - Node number to use when creating the device.
>> - *
>> - * Initialize and register the node device.
>> - */
>> -static int register_node(struct node *node, int num)
>> -{
>> - int error;
>> -
>> - node->dev.id = num;
>> - node->dev.bus = &node_subsys;
>> - node->dev.release = node_device_release;
>> - node->dev.groups = node_dev_groups;
>> - error = device_register(&node->dev);
>> -
>> - if (error) {
>> - put_device(&node->dev);
>> - } else {
>> - hugetlb_register_node(node);
>> - compaction_register_node(node);
>> - reclaim_register_node(node);
>> - }
>> -
>> - return error;
>> -}
>> -
>> /**
>> * unregister_node - unregister a node device
>> * @node: node going away
>> @@ -869,7 +842,13 @@ void
>> register_memory_blocks_under_node_hotplug(int nid, unsigned long
>> start_pfn,
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>> -int register_one_node(int nid)
>> +/*
>> + * register_node - Setup a sysfs device for a node.
>> + * @nid - Node number to use when creating the device.
>> + *
>> + * Initialize and register the node device.
>> + */
>> +int register_node(int nid)
>> {
>> int error;
>> int cpu;
>> @@ -880,14 +859,23 @@ int register_one_node(int nid)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->access_list);
>> - node_devices[nid] = node;
>> - error = register_node(node_devices[nid], nid);
>> + node->dev.id = nid;
>> + node->dev.bus = &node_subsys;
>> + node->dev.release = node_device_release;
>> + node->dev.groups = node_dev_groups;
>> +
>> + error = device_register(&node->dev);
>> if (error) {
>> - node_devices[nid] = NULL;
>> + put_device(&node->dev);
>> return error;
>> }
>> + node_devices[nid] = node;
>> + hugetlb_register_node(node);
>> + compaction_register_node(node);
>> + reclaim_register_node(node);
>> +
>> /* link cpu under this node */
>> for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> if (cpu_to_node(cpu) == nid)
>> @@ -980,7 +968,7 @@ void __init node_dev_init(void)
>> * to already created cpu devices.
>> */
>> for_each_online_node(i) {
>> - ret = register_one_node(i);
>> + ret = register_node(i);
>> if (ret)
>> panic("%s() failed to add node: %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
>> index 2c7529335b21..4dcf876cd0b4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/node.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static inline int
>> hotplug_node_notifier(notifier_fn_t fn, int pri)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> extern void node_dev_init(void);
>> /* Core of the node registration - only memory hotplug should use
>> this */
>> -extern int register_one_node(int nid);
>> +extern int register_node(int nid);
>
> extern keyword is pointless on functions prototypes.
>
> checkpatch.pl usually complains about that.
>
> I know previous prototype was extern and all surrounding also are, but
> it is not because mistakes were done in the past that you have to
> continue doing the same mistakes.
>
Thank you for the comment. I will address it in the next version.
>
>
>> extern void unregister_one_node(int nid);
>> extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int
>> nid);
>> extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int
>> nid);
>> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ extern int
>> register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid,
>> static inline void node_dev_init(void)
>> {
>> }
>> -static inline int register_one_node(int nid)
>> +static inline int register_node(int nid)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index 0be83039c3b5..6c050d867031 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ static int __try_online_node(int nid, bool
>> set_node_online)
>> if (set_node_online) {
>> node_set_online(nid);
>> - ret = register_one_node(nid);
>> + ret = register_node(nid);
>> BUG_ON(ret);
>> }
>> out:
>> @@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ int add_memory_resource(int nid, struct
>> resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
>> goto error_memblock_remove;
>> if (ret) {
>> node_set_online(nid);
>> - ret = register_one_node(nid);
>> + ret = register_node(nid);
>> if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
>> node_set_offline(nid);
>> goto error_memblock_remove;
>> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
>> index df614556741a..e1a19a3dadd7 100644
>> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
>> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
>> @@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ void __init free_area_init(unsigned long
>> *max_zone_pfn)
>> free_area_init_node(nid);
>> /*
>> - * No sysfs hierarchy will be created via register_one_node()
>> + * No sysfs hierarchy will be created via register_node()
>> *for memory-less node because here it's not marked as
>> N_MEMORY
>> *and won't be set online later. The benefit is userspace
>> *program won't be confused by sysfs files/directories of
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 18:40 [PATCH 0/2] drivers/base/node: fold node register and unregister functions Donet Tom
2025-09-24 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers/base/node: merge register_one_node() and register_node() to a single function Donet Tom
2025-09-24 19:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-25 5:01 ` Donet Tom [this message]
2025-09-25 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 9:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-25 9:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 13:21 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25 13:20 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-24 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] drivers/base/node: merge unregister_one_node() and unregister_node() " Donet Tom
2025-09-24 19:19 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-25 5:03 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 9:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] drivers/base/node: fold node register and unregister functions Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b68642ac-ca2a-4775-8a1f-02cf7681545e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox