From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests/mm: remove flaky header check
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 11:18:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b62c18a2-7036-4cca-a3e6-8a873a2ca832@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216142633.2401447-2-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
On 2025/12/16 22:26, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> Commit 96ed62ea0298 ("mm: page_frag: fix a compile error when kernel
> is not compiled") introduced a check to avoid attempting to build
> the page_frag module if <linux/page_frag_cache.h> is missing.
>
> Unfortunately this check only works if KDIR points to
> /lib/modules/... or an in-tree kernel build. It always fails if KDIR
> points to an out-of-tree build (i.e. when the kernel was built with
> O=$KDIR make) because only generated headers are present under
> $KDIR/include/ in that case.
>
> <linux/page_frag_cache.h> was added more than a year ago (v6.13) so
> we can probably live without that check.
As some commercial OS still uses v6.6, I am wondering if we need that
check for a little longer, is it possible to do something like below to
avoid the flaky check?
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ CFLAGS += -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
KDIR ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build
ifneq (,$(wildcard $(KDIR)/Module.symvers))
-ifneq (,$(wildcard $(KDIR)/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h))
+KSRC := $(shell readlink -f $(KDIR)/source 2>/dev/null || echo $(KDIR))
+ifneq (,$(wildcard $(KSRC)/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h))
TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR := page_frag
else
PAGE_FRAG_WARNING = "missing page_frag_cache.h, please use a newer kernel"
>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> index eaf9312097f7..aba51fcac752 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> @@ -46,12 +46,8 @@ CFLAGS += -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
>
> KDIR ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build
> ifneq (,$(wildcard $(KDIR)/Module.symvers))
> -ifneq (,$(wildcard $(KDIR)/include/linux/page_frag_cache.h))
> TEST_GEN_MODS_DIR := page_frag
> else
> -PAGE_FRAG_WARNING = "missing page_frag_cache.h, please use a newer kernel"
> -endif
> -else
> PAGE_FRAG_WARNING = "missing Module.symvers, please have the kernel built first"
> endif
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 14:26 [PATCH 0/4] Various mm kselftests improvements/fixes Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/mm: remove flaky header check Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17 3:18 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2025-12-17 9:58 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 7:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-12-17 10:04 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-18 13:24 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 14:25 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-29 15:40 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/mm: pass down full CC and CFLAGS to check_config.sh Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/mm: fix faulting-in code in pagemap_ioctl test Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:56 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 15:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-18 13:18 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-19 8:29 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-29 11:46 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/mm: fix exit code in pagemap_ioctl Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16 14:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 10:08 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-18 13:20 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 8:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b62c18a2-7036-4cca-a3e6-8a873a2ca832@huawei.com \
--to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox