linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
	david@redhat.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: mincore: fix tmpfs mincore test failure
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:47:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5dd6494-b636-4742-8d96-d8b888d6b9c8@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <992DD536-7047-4C2C-97EB-7F23100143E3@nvidia.com>



On 2025/3/27 22:36, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2025, at 23:38, Baolin Wang wrote:
> 
>> When running mincore test cases, I encountered the following failures:
>>
>> "
>> mincore_selftest.c:359:check_tmpfs_mmap:Expected ra_pages (511) == 0 (0)
>> mincore_selftest.c:360:check_tmpfs_mmap:Read-ahead pages found in memory
>> check_tmpfs_mmap: Test terminated by assertion
>>            FAIL  global.check_tmpfs_mmap
>> not ok 5 global.check_tmpfs_mmap
>> FAILED: 4 / 5 tests passed
>> "
>>
>> The reason for the test case failure is that my system automatically enabled
>> tmpfs large folio allocation by adding the 'transparent_hugepage_tmpfs=always'
>> cmdline. However, the test case still expects the tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm to
>> allocate small folios, which leads to assertion failures when verifying readahead
>> pages.
>>
>> To fix this issue, remount tmpfs to a new test directory and set the 'huge=never'
>> parameter to avoid allocating large folios, which can pass the test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   .../selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c      | 25 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>
>>   	errno = 0;
>> -	fd = open("/dev/shm", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0600);
>> +	/* Do not use large folios for tmpfs mincore testing */
>> +	retval = mount("tmpfs", tmpfs_loc, "tmpfs", 0, "huge=never,size=4M");
>> +	ASSERT_EQ(0, retval) {
>> +		TH_LOG("Unable to mount tmpfs for testing\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	retval = snprintf(testfile, INPUT_MAX, "%s/test_file", tmpfs_loc);
>> +	ASSERT_GE(INPUT_MAX, retval) {
>> +		TH_LOG("Unable to create a tmpfs for testing\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	fd = open(testfile, O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0664);
> 
> The fd permission is changed from 0600 to 0664, but it probably does not
> matter.

It is just a temp file, so it doesn't matter.

> 
>>   	ASSERT_NE(-1, fd) {
>>   		TH_LOG("Can't create temporary file: %s",
>>   			strerror(errno));
>> @@ -363,6 +382,8 @@ TEST(check_tmpfs_mmap)
>>   	munmap(addr, FILE_SIZE);
>>   	close(fd);
>>   	free(vec);
>> +	umount(tmpfs_loc);
>> +	rmdir(tmpfs_loc);
>>   }
>>
>>   TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
>> -- 
>> 2.43.5
> 
> Otherwise, LGTM. Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>

Thanks for reviewing.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-30 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-26  3:38 [PATCH 0/2] Fix mincore() tmpfs " Baolin Wang
2025-03-26  3:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests: mincore: fix tmpfs mincore " Baolin Wang
2025-03-27 14:36   ` Zi Yan
2025-03-30 19:47     ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-04-01 12:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07  3:49     ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-07  7:49       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07  8:35         ` Baolin Wang
2025-03-26  3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: mincore: use folio_pte_batch() to batch process large folios Baolin Wang
2025-03-27 10:49   ` Oscar Salvador
2025-03-27 11:54     ` Baolin Wang
2025-03-27 14:08   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-28 13:10     ` Oscar Salvador
2025-03-30 19:57     ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-01 10:45       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-01 13:04         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07  6:33           ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-14 13:46             ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-07  5:12   ` Dev Jain
2025-05-07  9:48     ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-07  9:54       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-07 10:03         ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-07 11:14           ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b5dd6494-b636-4742-8d96-d8b888d6b9c8@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox