From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
shy828301@gmail.com, david@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Extend migrate_misplaced_page() to support batch migration
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:26:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5a75def-521f-0d0b-6054-d71f56d4e1ad@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zg2h9h5c.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 8/24/2023 12:51 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> writes:
>
>> On 8/22/2023 10:47 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Currently, on our ARM servers with NUMA enabled, we found the cross-die latency
>>>> is a little larger that will significantly impact the workload's performance.
>>>> So on ARM servers we will rely on the NUMA balancing to avoid the cross-die
>>>> accessing. And I posted a patchset[1] to support speculative numa fault to
>>>> improve the NUMA balancing's performance according to the principle of data
>>>> locality. Moreover, thanks to Huang Ying's patchset[2], which introduced batch
>>>> migration as a way to reduce the cost of TLB flush, and it will also benefit
>>>> the migration of multiple pages all at once during NUMA balancing.
>>>>
>>>> So we plan to continue to support batch migration in do_numa_page() to improve
>>>> the NUMA balancing's performance, but before adding complicated batch migration
>>>> algorithm for NUMA balancing, some cleanup and preparation work need to do firstly,
>>>> which are done in this patch set. In short, this patchset extends the
>>>> migrate_misplaced_page() interface to support batch migration, and no functional
>>>> changes intended.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, these cleanup can also benefit the compound page's NUMA balancing,
>>>> which was discussed in previous thread[3]. IIUC, for the compound page's NUMA
>>>> balancing, it is possible that partial pages were successfully migrated, so it is
>>>> necessary to return the number of pages that were successfully migrated from
>>>> migrate_misplaced_page().
>>> But I don't find the return number is used except as bool now.
>>
>> As I said above, this is a preparation for batch migration and
>> compound page NUMA balancing in future.
>>
>> In addition, after looking into the THP' NUMA migration, I found this
>> change is necessary for THP migration. Since it is possible that
>> partial subpages were successfully migrated if the THP is split, so
>> below THP numa fault statistics is not always correct:
>>
>> if (page_nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
>> task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, page_nid, HPAGE_PMD_NR,
>> flags);
>>
>> I will try to fix this in next version.
>
> IIUC, THP will not be split for NUMA balancing. Please check the
> nosplit logic in migrate_pages_batch().
>
> bool nosplit = (reason == MR_NUMA_MISPLACED);
Yes, I overlooked this. Thanks for reminding.
>
>>> Per my understanding, I still don't find much value of the changes
>>> except as preparation for batch migration in NUMA balancing. So I still
>>
>> IMO, only patch 3 is just a preparation for batch migration, but other
>> patches are some cleanups for migrate_misplaced_page(). I can drop the
>> preparation patches in this series and revise the commit message.
>>
>>> think it's better to wait for the whole series. Where we can check why
>>> these changes are necessary for batch migration. And I think that you
>>> will provide some number to justify the batch migration, including pros
>>> and cons.
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Huang, Ying
>>>
>>>> This series is based on the latest mm-unstable(d226b59b30cc).
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1639306956.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com/t/#mc45929849b5d0e29b5fdd9d50425f8e95b8f2563
>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230213123444.155149-1-ying.huang@intel.com/T/#u
>>>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/f8d47176-03a8-99bf-a813-b5942830fd73@arm.com/
>>>>
>>>> Changes from v1:
>>>> - Move page validation into a new function suggested by Huang Ying.
>>>> - Change numamigrate_isolate_page() to boolean type.
>>>> - Update some commit message.
>>>>
>>>> Baolin Wang (4):
>>>> mm: migrate: factor out migration validation into
>>>> numa_page_can_migrate()
>>>> mm: migrate: move the numamigrate_isolate_page() into do_numa_page()
>>>> mm: migrate: change migrate_misplaced_page() to support multiple pages
>>>> migration
>>>> mm: migrate: change to return the number of pages migrated
>>>> successfully
>>>>
>>>> include/linux/migrate.h | 15 +++++++---
>>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 23 +++++++++++++--
>>>> mm/internal.h | 1 +
>>>> mm/memory.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> mm/migrate.c | 64 +++++++++--------------------------------
>>>> 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-24 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 0:53 Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: migrate: factor out migration validation into numa_page_can_migrate() Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: migrate: move the numamigrate_isolate_page() into do_numa_page() Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 9:02 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-08-24 3:14 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: migrate: change migrate_misplaced_page() to support multiple pages migration Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: migrate: change to return the number of pages migrated successfully Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 2:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Extend migrate_misplaced_page() to support batch migration Huang, Ying
2023-08-24 3:13 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-24 4:51 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-24 6:26 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5a75def-521f-0d0b-6054-d71f56d4e1ad@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox