From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
nadav.amit@gmail.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
mhklinux@outlook.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
Manali Shukla <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/12] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:23:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b56f0ef79708c66adf8971b78d631eb5f318e48c.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+i-1C1fP+Lk4FGO+-sLMq+LmjVjm-1r-wG15oKtDDu0=gi+Gg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 13:10 +0100, Brendan Jackman wrote:
>
> Maybe I can send a separate patch to note this in the commentary,
> it's
> interesting and useful to know.
>
I added a similar comment to this patch series
for v10 yesterday. I'll send it out after a few
more tests have finished running.
I'm not particularly invested in which version
of the comment gets merged :)
--
All Rights Reversed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 4:43 [PATCH v9 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional Rik van Riel
2025-02-07 14:28 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-11 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-11 12:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-11 20:23 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] x86/mm: remove pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-02-07 14:50 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-07 20:22 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-10 11:15 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-10 19:12 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-02-07 15:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-07 17:34 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-10 7:30 ` Vern Hao
2025-02-10 16:48 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-12 1:18 ` Vern Hao
2025-02-12 1:57 ` Vern Hao
2025-02-12 15:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-13 8:16 ` Vern Hao
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-02-07 16:03 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-07 20:50 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-10 11:22 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-11 2:01 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] x86/mm: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-02-10 14:15 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-11 3:07 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-02-10 15:27 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-11 3:45 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-11 10:02 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-11 20:21 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-12 10:38 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 4:43 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 10:16 ` [PATCH v9 00/12] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Oleksandr Natalenko
2025-02-06 14:16 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-06 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 14:48 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-07 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 17:46 ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-07 18:23 ` Brendan Jackman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b56f0ef79708c66adf8971b78d631eb5f318e48c.camel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox