Re: CXL Boot to Bash - Section 3: Memory (block) Hotplug

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 20.02.25 20:35, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 08:26:21PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 20.02.25 19:43, Gregory Price wrote:
>>
>> There were ideas in how to optimize that (e.g., requiring  a new sysfs
>> interface to expose variable-sized blocks), if anybody is interested, please
>> reach out.
>>
> 
> Multiple block sizes would allow managing the misaligned issues I
> discussed earlier as well (where a memory region is not aligned to the
> arch-preferred block size).  At least in that scenario, the misaligned
> regions could be brought online as minimal block size (256MB) while the
> aligned portions could be brought online in larger (2GB) chunks.
> 
> Do you think this would this require a lot of churn to enable? Last I dug
> through hotplug, it seemed to assume block sizes would be uniform. I was
> hesitant to start ripping through it.

There were some discussions around variable-sized memory blocks. But we 
cannot rip out the old stuff, because it breaks API and thereby Linux 
user space. There would have to be a world switch (e.g., kernel cmdline, 
config option)

... and some corner cases are rather nasty (e.g., hotunplugging boot 
memory, where we only learn from ACPI which regions actually belong to a 
single DIMM; dlpar hotunplugging individual memory blocks of boot memory 
IIRC).

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb