From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BBFC433EF for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 01FD58E0001; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:14:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F11926B0072; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:14:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E00AC8E0001; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:14:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECE56B0071 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 03:14:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F847336A3 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:14:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79623152532.12.910CF26 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E386318002D for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDD81758; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.42.6] (unknown [10.162.42.6]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32FF03F5A1; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:14:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:44:19 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: kill set_huge_swap_pte_at() Content-Language: en-US To: Qi Zheng , mike.kravetz@oracle.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20220626145717.53572-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> <037fc8c3-9b71-cb83-8882-95d5459a494f@bytedance.com> From: Anshuman Khandual In-Reply-To: <037fc8c3-9b71-cb83-8882-95d5459a494f@bytedance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1656314066; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2ZQ+eejdn5pfaRsvOW7rc4FQJQXJ2Fd29xjvHg1iNAg=; b=WyWMUDX/0+2SzXz0QtmwS7pvQb3faMkSicf2tMT51ND7GyCjGoB11YiClVvX8ra/1drGhb bNNT1jZbO77l4nwmhHFy0HUrsV46LEs9rQFty++VqvsLw3u69z0gLQE875bqW4P2L6xOQO Jj7BdeVCVuCVypON8HyLlVWw6WIa3qA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of anshuman.khandual@arm.com designates 217.140.110.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=anshuman.khandual@arm.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=arm.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1656314066; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vdXvmWT8i9CUPtYDgLi7trrsMcfMF9kX3I1cvvc6ZSWLS8VF0q5G43YpLbWn6dSxz6viut wIvURAbcZuiW/FvMbzJy+roUc0fsHu4Qh2sBJETV/Ynam4a/gzfxKo4wBp6HfidrVVXwzQ +F5eU/tmBbYxmc6jGs+GTlmJDq2S6CE= Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of anshuman.khandual@arm.com designates 217.140.110.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=anshuman.khandual@arm.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=arm.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Stat-Signature: ccd3pzf7nqnaa16ho3ijdxuq8szs5wzy X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E386318002D X-HE-Tag: 1656314065-925590 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 6/27/22 12:25, Qi Zheng wrote: > > > On 2022/6/27 14:18, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> >> >> On 6/26/22 20:27, Qi Zheng wrote: >>> The commit e5251fd43007 ("mm/hugetlb: introduce set_huge_swap_pte_at() >>> helper") add set_huge_swap_pte_at() to handle swap entries on >>> architectures that support hugepages consisting of contiguous ptes. >>> And currently the set_huge_swap_pte_at() is only overridden by arm64. >>> >>> The set_huge_swap_pte_at() provide a sz parameter to help determine >>> the number of entries to be updated. But in fact, all hugetlb swap >>> entries contain pfn information, so we can find the corresponding >>> folio through the pfn recorded in the swap entry, then the folio_size() >>> is the number of entries that need to be updated. >>> >>> And considering that users will easily cause bugs by ignoring the >>> difference between set_huge_swap_pte_at() and set_huge_pte_at(). >>> Let's handle swap entries in set_huge_pte_at() and remove the >>> set_huge_swap_pte_at(), then we can call set_huge_pte_at() >>> anywhere, which simplifies our coding. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng >>> --- >>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h |  3 --- >>>   arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c      | 34 ++++++++++++++++---------------- >>>   include/linux/hugetlb.h          | 13 ------------ >>>   mm/hugetlb.c                     |  8 +++----- >>>   mm/rmap.c                        | 11 +++-------- >>>   5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h >>> index 1fd2846dbefe..d20f5da2d76f 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hugetlb.h >>> @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ extern void huge_pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, >>>                  pte_t *ptep, unsigned long sz); >>>   #define __HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_PTEP_GET >>>   extern pte_t huge_ptep_get(pte_t *ptep); >>> -extern void set_huge_swap_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, >>> -                 pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned long sz); >>> -#define set_huge_swap_pte_at set_huge_swap_pte_at >>>     void __init arm64_hugetlb_cma_reserve(void); >>>   diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c >>> index c9e076683e5d..58b89b9d13e0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c >>> @@ -238,6 +238,13 @@ static void clear_flush(struct mm_struct *mm, >>>       flush_tlb_range(&vma, saddr, addr); >>>   } >>>   +static inline struct folio *hugetlb_swap_entry_to_folio(swp_entry_t entry) >>> +{ >>> +    VM_BUG_ON(!is_migration_entry(entry) && !is_hwpoison_entry(entry)); >>> + >>> +    return page_folio(pfn_to_page(swp_offset(entry))); >>> +} >> >> Extracting this huge page size from swap entry is an additional operation which >> will increase the over all cost for set_huge_swap_pte_at(). At present the size > > Hmm, I think this cost is very small. And replacing > set_huge_swap_pte_at() by transparently handling swap entries helps > reduce possible bugs, which is worthwhile. Possible bugs ? There are just six call sites for this function. Although this proposed patch is functionally correct, I dont see a valid enough reason to increase the overall cost in the path.