From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@kernel.org, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/madvise: handle madvise_lock() failure during race unwinding
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 20:28:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3783c64-1f68-452d-ade2-1fc44cd8f080@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez0cysRfJ82UKH39Ns0gYOcmn7HR=UVRDo74w=uwm6pcTg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 09:20:14PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> @akpm FYI, this looks like it fixes a security bug in 6.15 (probably
> leads to UAF of VMA structs and page tables by racing madvise(...,
> MADV_GUARD_INSTALL) with concurrent faults)
Hmm MADV_GUARD_INSTALL / MADV_GUARD_REMOVE require only a read lock, so
madvise_lock() will be:
if (madvise_need_mmap_write(behavior)) { <--- nope
if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
return -EINTR;
} else {
mmap_read_lock(mm); <---- this branch
}
return 0;
So for guard install, which is the only thing that can return -ERESTARTNOINTR
madvise_lock() ignoring the return value is essentially a no-op no?
Am I missing something?
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 7:49 PM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > When unwinding race on -ERESTARTNOINTR handling of process_madvise(),
> > madvise_lock() failure is ignored. Check the failure and abort
> > remaining works in the case.
> >
> > Fixes: 4000e3d0a367 ("mm/madvise: remove redundant mmap_lock operations from process_madvise()")
> > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> > Reported-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/CAGsJ_4xJXXO0G+4BizhohSZ4yDteziPw43_uF8nPXPWxUVChzw@mail.gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 17:49 SeongJae Park
2025-06-02 19:20 ` Jann Horn
2025-06-02 19:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-06-02 19:34 ` Jann Horn
2025-06-02 19:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-02 19:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-02 19:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-02 20:22 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-06-02 21:30 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3783c64-1f68-452d-ade2-1fc44cd8f080@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox